Keys to Writing a Successful Grant Application - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Keys to Writing a Successful Grant Application

Description:

General Advice about Grant Writing. Much of grant writing is simply good writing. CLEAR ... Critical evaluation of literature as it relates to proposed work and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: howards2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Keys to Writing a Successful Grant Application


1
Keys to Writing a Successful Grant Application
  • Paula Pietromonaco
  • University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • The Summer Institute on Social/Personality
    Psychology and Health
  • July 23, 2009

2
Overview
  • Before you write
  • Background research
  • Review criteria
  • Multiple audiences
  • General grant writing tips
  • Specific Aims The foundation
  • Tips for the other sections

3
Stage 1 Before You Write
  • Start with a novel idea
  • Do background research on mission of institute
    and specific programs
  • http//cancercontrol.cancer.gov/bbrb/about.html

4
Stage 1 Before You Write
  • What research is funded by institute and program
    of interest?
  • CRISP (Computer Retrieval of Information on
    Scientific Projects)
  • http//crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/crisp_query.generat
    e_screen

5
Stage 1 Before You Write
  • Get to know the review criteria
  • Significance Scientific practical importance
    Impact
  • Investigators Expertise, training,
    accomplishments
  • Innovation Challenge/shift current
    research/practice
  • Approach Soundness of overall strategy, methods,
    analyses. anticipate problems, address risks
  • Environment Institutional resources, equipment,
    access to special populations
  • See Veronica Chollettes presentation for more
    details.

6
Know your (multiple) audiences
Know your (multiple) audiences
  • Reviewers
  • Who are they?
  • Rosters of study section members are available
    online
  • Social Psychology, Personality and Interpersonal
    Processes Study Section SPIP
  • Reviewers
  • Who are they?
  • Rosters of study section members are available
    online
  • Social Psychology, Personality and Interpersonal
    Processes Study Section SPIP

http//cms.csr.nih.gov/PeerReviewMeetings/CSRIRGDe
scriptionNew/RPHBIRG/SPIP.htm
7
Know your (multiple) audiences
  • Advisory board/council members program
    officials
  • Is work relevant to their institute and programs
    mission?
  • http//deainfo.nci.nih.gov/Advisory/ncab.htm

8
Reaching the Reviewers
  • Primary reviewer
  • Will present overview of the application and
    discuss strengths and weaknesses (also writes a
    critique)
  • Secondary reviewer
  • Writes a critique and may add points not
    mentioned by primary reviewer

9
Reaching the Reviewers
Reaching the Reviewers
  • Other Study Section Reviewers
  • What will they read?
  • All study group members give your application a
    score
  • Other Study Section Reviewers
  • What will they read?
  • All study group members give your application a
    score

10
Reaching the Reviewers
  • Clarity, connection, and logic required to
  • Convince reviewers that work is exciting
    important method is solid and free of major
    flaws and you (and your research team) can
    successfully carry out the work
  • Address each of review criteria in Specific Aims
  • Revisit and expand in full application for those
    who read complete version

11
Advisory Board/Council
Advisory Board/Council
  • Will take into account scientific merit but also
    want to know that your work fits with the mission
    of the institute and program.
  • Will take into account scientific merit but also
    want to know that your work fits with the mission
    of the institute and program.

12
General Advice about Grant Writing
General Advice about Grant Writing
  • Much of grant writing is simply good writing
  • CLEAR
  • CONNECTED
  • CONCISE
  • CORRECT
  • Same principles as in all writing but more so for
    grants. Why?
  • Much of grant writing is simply good writing
  • CLEAR
  • CONNECTED
  • CONCISE
  • CORRECT
  • Same principles as in all writing but more so for
    grants. Why?

13
Clarity
  • Use simple, direct language (avoid jargon)
  • discrimination-experienced people
  • People who have experienced discrimination

14
Clarity
Clarity
  • Be specific.
  • This work will significantly move the field
    forward. How?
  • This research is important for understanding how
    people make health-related decisions. because?
  • Be specific.
  • This work will significantly move the field
    forward. How?
  • This research is important for understanding how
    people make health-related decisions. because?

15
Be concise
  • Omit needless words
  • Recent research has shown that the enhancement of
    mindfulness through training facilitates a
    variety of well-being outcomes (e.g.,
    Kabat-Zinn). 17 words citation
  • Enhancing mindfulness through training
    facilitates well-being (e.g.., Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
    6 words citation

16
Specific Aims
  • Aimed at primary and secondary reviewers, other
    study group members, and advisory board/council
    members, program staff.
  • Diverse audience
  • Needs to be clear, concise, and compelling!

17
NIH Instructions Specific Aims
  • List the broad, long-term objectives and the goal
    of the specific research proposed, for example,
    to test a stated hypothesis, create a novel
    design, solve a specific problem, challenge an
    existing paradigm or clinical practice, address a
    critical barrier to progress in the field, or
    develop new technology. One page is recommended.

18
SPECIFIC AIMS STEP BY STEP
  • WHAT IS KNOWN
  • GAP
  • GOAL/PURPOSE
  • GUIDING HYPOTHESIS
  • SPECIFIC AIMS
  • IMPACT/EXPECTED OUTCOMES

19
Specific Aims I
Specific Aims I
  • What is this proposal about and what is its
    relevance for health (cancer-related issues if
    NCI).
  • What do we know about this issue?
  • What is the important gap in knowledge that you
    need to fill?
  • Why do you need to fill this gap?
  • Why is it a significant problem worthy of funding
    to address? E.g., Why is it a barrier to progress
    in the field? )
  • What is this proposal about and what is its
    relevance for health (cancer-related issues if
    NCI).
  • What do we know about this issue?
  • What is the important gap in knowledge that you
    need to fill?
  • Why do you need to fill this gap?
  • Why is it a significant problem worthy of funding
    to address? E.g., Why is it a barrier to progress
    in the field? )

20
Specific Aims II
Specific Aims II
  • Long-term goals
  • Broader than specific goal of this project, where
    the work will take you.
  • Connect to the gap you have identified.
  • Shows program of research that ideally ? several
    future grant applications.
  • What is the goal of this project Its to fill
    that gap you identified! Connect to long-term
    goals.
  • Long-term goals
  • Broader than specific goal of this project, where
    the work will take you.
  • Connect to the gap you have identified.
  • Shows program of research that ideally ? several
    future grant applications.
  • What is the goal of this project Its to fill
    that gap you identified! Connect to long-term
    goals.

21
Specific Aims II (cont.)
Specific Aims II (cont.)
  • Main hypothesis
  • What is it? Why? (Is it derived from preliminary
    findings? Is it the best fit given the
    literature?)
  • Justification for the Proposed Research Why is
    it important to do this particular research? How
    will it allow you to move to the next step?
  • Main hypothesis
  • What is it? Why? (Is it derived from preliminary
    findings? Is it the best fit given the
    literature?)
  • Justification for the Proposed Research Why is
    it important to do this particular research? How
    will it allow you to move to the next step?

22
Specific Aims III
Specific Aims III
  • Lay out each specific aim hypothesis for each.
  • Should follow closely from your overarching
    hypothesis.
  • Hypothesis-driven
  • Mechanism/process-oriented rather than
    descriptive
  • Lay out each specific aim hypothesis for each.
  • Should follow closely from your overarching
    hypothesis.
  • Hypothesis-driven
  • Mechanism/process-oriented rather than
    descriptive

23
Specific Aims IV
Specific Aims IV
  • What will your work buy us?
  • Innovation
  • Expected outcomes
  • What impact will your work have on the
    health-related problem and the field?
  • What will your work buy us?
  • Innovation
  • Expected outcomes
  • What impact will your work have on the
    health-related problem and the field?

24
Solicit Comments
  • Colleagues (2)
  • Revise
  • Program Director

idea.
25
Other sections
  • Use Specific Aims as foundation for rest of
    application
  • Background and Significance
  • Preliminary Studies/Progress Report
  • Research Design and Methods

26
Writing Timeline
Writing Timeline
  • Create a writing timeline.
  • Be realistic!
  • Are you teaching? Editing? Mentoring grad
    students?
  • 4-6 months (!!!)
  • Create a writing timeline.
  • Be realistic!
  • Are you teaching? Editing? Mentoring grad
    students?
  • 4-6 months (!!!)

Ill finish all of this today and then write the
whole grant proposal tomorrow.
27
Background Significance
  • Significance Expand on importance and impact
    mentioned in Specific Aims
  • Why is work significant? Specific benefits of the
    knowledge to be obtained?
  • How will these benefits
  • fit with NCIs mission?
  • advance the field?
  • Primary reviewer can draw on this section.

28
Background Significance
  • Selective review
  • Critical evaluation of literature as it relates
    to proposed work and gap to be filled.
  • Cite key articles, update
  • Discuss any relevant controversies and how
    project will resolve
  • Provides rationale for the gap(s) you have
    identified, leads into your main hypothesis
    preliminary studies

29
Preliminary Studies/Progress Report
  • Establish your (and your teams) competence
    expertise
  • Present your relevant data explicitly state
    your conclusions
  • Clearly connect by stating relevance for the
    proposed work
  • Include figures (and/or tables)

30
Research Design Methods
  • Describe how you will carry out the research
  • Must relate closely to your specific aims
  • Include details for specific methodology and why
    the chosen method is the best to accomplish your
    goals.
  • Organize by aim.
  • Troubleshoot How will you avoid or handle
    potential problems? Alternatives?

31
Breakdown the Task
  • Research Design Methods
  • Specific Aim 1
  • Introduction
  • Experimental Design
  • Study 1
  • Study 2
  • Etc.
  • Expected Outcomes
  • Anticipated problems/alternative strategies

32
Example How will we handle?
  • Managing attrition retention
  • Problem Attrition at Time 2 and Time 3 because
  • may not be able to recontact
  • may choose not to continue
  • may get divorced
  • Compensate increase
  • Contact info for 3 friends or relatives
  • Give PI contact info
  • and more.

33
Research Design Methods
  • Statistical strategy (justify use of specific
    analytic techniques, power analysis)
  • Remember to include timetable for project
  • Key point Justify everything!

34
Solicit colleagues comments
  • Early Specific Aims
  • Later Full proposal
  • Anticipate reviewers comments
  • Only 2 chances

35
Be Correct (in content details)
  • Instructions (formatting, page limits, font,
    margins)
  • Sections in prescribed order
  • Proofread eliminate typos, grammatical errors,
    etc.
  • Proofread againand again

36
Grant Writing Tip Sheets/Guidebooks
  • NIH Office of Extramural Research
  • http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/grant_tips.htm
  • Http//grants.nih.gov/grants/writing_application.h
    tm
  • Grant Writers Seminars and Workshops LLC (but
    )
  • Http//www.grantcentral.com/workbooks.html

37
Thank you!
YOU HAVE A VERY LONG GENIUS GRANT LINE.
Cartoonstock.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com