Quality Control and Testing

1
Quality Control and Testing
FAG Members Karene Josephs Rosalind Ker Shivani
Jain
2
Introduction

• The technology we are looking for
• has the ability to enforce stricter quality
  control measures
• minimizes human error
• increases compliance with FDAs latest
  regulations
• has real time product quality feedback
• is a product that builds quality at the point
  of production

3
2300 East 14th Street, Tulsa, OK 74104Phone
[phone] Fax [phone]www.statsoft.c
om/products/sewss.html

• offers charts for Range, Variance, Binomial
  Counts, Binomial proportions, Cumulative Sum,
  Moving Range Charts, run charts, regression
  charts, moving average, and exponentially-weighted
  moving average
• very flexible, the data can be organized to
  accommodate practically all formats in which data
  is gathered
• alarm notification when something is out of the
  ordinary
• a wide variety of additional quality control
  statistics are included, and there is room for
  explanation of outliers

4
The Premier Quality Management System
www.zontec-spc.com/synergy2000/synergy2000.html

• provides real time enterprise-wide view of any
  and every process
• you can establish sample sizes, control limits,
  part folders, characteristic files, define screen
  layouts, analyze data, generate detailed quality
  and compliance reports, audit trials and trace
  ability
• monitor processes globally in real time
• Powerful monitoring from manager level
• view data in run chart, histogram, moving
  average/range, capability charts, 3 charts,
  overlay charts and tool wear charts
• pop-up warning for Control Trent Test when
  non-random patterns occur in the data

5
Total Score per Requirement
SW 1 Statistica SW 2 Zontec Synergy
2000 fur Functional Requirements sr - Security
Requirements tr Technology Requirements uir
User Interface Requirements vr Vendor
Capability Requirements
6
Top Scores for Functional Requirements per
Software
SW 1 - Statistica SW 2 Zontec Synergy 2000 rr
Rated Requirements fur Functional Requirements
7
Recommendations
Our decision is to choose

• WHY?
• Provide on site training and maintain call
  centres for support.
• Greater compatibility with PetPros system and
  any future integration that may occur.
• Quality of output and functionality is high.
• Implemented by both large and small
  corporations.
• Currently, used by some renowned organizations,
  Ex. 3M, Nestles Purina Pet food.

The template provides evidence that Zontecs
Synergy 2000 is the best suited software for our
purposes. Zontecs Premier Quality Management
System will be a great asset to PetPros future
by enabling our quality control sector to operate
more efficiently and effectively.
8
Critique of Template

• Cons
• Scoring system is redundant.
• Couldnt change format.
• Lack of ease of comprehension with the short
  forms in the Data Sheet for Technology Evaluation
  Template.

• Pros
• Inputing data was easy.
• Questions were relevent and applicable to the
  software being analysed.
• Questions helped in familiarizing ourselves with
  each software and guided us to our decision.

9
Quality Control Testing

• Thank you!