Enhancing Reflection and Assessment in Higher Education Service Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Enhancing Reflection and Assessment in Higher Education Service Learning

Description:

Students' learning and attitudes from service ... Everybody's crew. (Marshall McLuhan) ... Eyler, J, Giles, D.E, & Schmiede, A. (1996) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: educ356
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Enhancing Reflection and Assessment in Higher Education Service Learning


1
Enhancing Reflection and Assessment in Higher
Education Service Learning
  • Rahima Wade
  • The University of Iowa

2
What are the purposes of reflection?
  • Reflective thinking
  • Connecting theory to practice
  • Learning from experience
  • Validating the service experience
  • Personal development
  • Understanding of course content
  • Developing a commitment to active citizenship

3
What can we assess?
  • Students learning and attitudes from service
  • Students learning of course content and skills
    from service
  • Impact of the service experience on the
    community, faculty, and other collaborators

4
Reflect and Assess
  • Reflective thinking
  • Connecting theory to practice
  • Learning from experience
  • Personal development
  • Understanding of course content
  • Students learning and attitudes from service
  • Students learning of course content and skills
    from service

5
Keys to quality reflection
  • Respect students ideas.
  • Encourage student to student talk.
  • Arrange room to face each other.
  • Insist on respectful dialogue.
  • Plan ahead for reflection activities.
  • Reflect throughout the CSL experience.
  • Allow adequate time for reflection.

6
More keys to quality reflection
  • Use different reflection methods.
  • Make reflection challenging, relevant, and fun.
  • Reflect on your experience in facilitating
    reflection.

7
Effective critical reflection is
  • Continuous
  • Connected
  • Challenging
  • Contextualized
  • The 4 Cs of Reflection - from
    Eyler, Giles and Schmiede, 1996

8
Reflection strategies
  • READING - literature, case studies
  • WRITING - journals, portfolios, papers
  • DOING - role plays, presentations
  • SPEAKING - discussions, focus groups, recruiting,
    teaching

9
Topics to focus reflection
  • Self - emotions, values, skills
  • Others - expectations, problems
  • Issues - facts, changing views
  • Service - benefits to others, skills
  • Citizenship - service as part of it
  • Course content or skills - theory to practice

10
Quotes for reflection
  • There are no passengers on spaceship earth.
    Everybodys crew. (Marshall McLuhan)
  • Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
    nothing is going to get better. Its not.
    (Dr. Seuss)

11
Quotes continued
  • Of all the teachings we receive, this one is most
    important Nothing belongs to you of what there
    is. Of what you take, you must share. (Chief
    Dan George)
  • Ask not what your country can do for you, ask
    what you can do for your country.
    (John F. Kennedy)

12
Questions for Assessment
  • What is the purpose?
  • Who wants or needs the information?
  • What resources are available to support
    assessment?
  • Who will conduct the assessment?
  • How can I ensure the results are used?

  • (Gelmon, 2000)

13
A Comprehensive Model
  • Goal What do we want to know?
  • Variable What will we look for?
  • Indicator What will be measured?
  • Method How will it be measured?
  • (Holland, 2001)

14
Partnering in Assessment
  • Share the process of designing and implementing
    assessment
  • Shared assessment enhanced collaboration,
    trust, and reciprocity among college and
    community partners

15
Examples of Assessments
  • Goal Students social responsibility
  • Variable involvement with community,
  • awareness of community issues
  • Indicator hours of participation,
  • intentions regarding future service
  • Method survey, observation, log,
  • focus group, journal

16
Comparison of Assessment Methods
17
Beyond studentsassessing community partner
impacts
  • Capacity to fulfill mission (new services,
    meeting clients needs)
  • Economic impacts (new funding)
  • Partnership sustainability (cost-benefit
    analysis, perceptions of trust)
  • Satisfaction (intention to continue, recruitment
    of students, ideas for future collaboration
    (Holland, 2001)

18
Pitfalls in Assessment
  • Lack of advance preparation
  • Unrealistic time frame
  • Inadequate human effort or resources
  • Lack of specificity
  • Inadequate expertise
  • Inability or neglect to use the findings

19
Quality assessment can serve to
  • Help others understand the program
  • Gain support for the program
  • Improve program practice
  • Assist with publicizing the program and
    recruiting new participants
  • Provide a solid argument for continued funding
    and support for the program

20
References
  • Eyler, J, Giles, D.E, Schmiede, A. (1996). A
    Pracitioners Guide to Reflection in
    Service-Learning. Nashville, TN Vanderbilt
    University.
  • Gelmon, S. B. (2000). How do we know that our
    work makes a difference? Assessment Strategies
    for Service-Learning and Civic Engagement.
    Metropolitan Universities, 11, 28-39.
  • Holland, B. (2001). A Comprehensive Model for
    Assessing Service-Learning and Community-Universit
    y Partnerships. New Directions in Higher
    Education, No. 114, 51-60.
  • Wade, R. C. (Ed.) (1997). Community
    service-learning A Guide to Including Service in
    the Public School Curriculum. Albany, NY State
    University of New York Press.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com