Title: Professor David Hargreaves
1Personalising learning
Professor David Hargreaves
EMB, Hong Kong, 13 September 2005
2English education policy 1979-2005
- The Thatcher years 1979-1997
- The slow transition from individualism to
centralism
Education reform Act 1988 National
curriculum,testing and inspection
The Blair years 1997-2005 The slow transition
from centralism to lateralism
3Labour education policy
EXCELLENCE!
EQUITY!
41 out of 10 from Downing Street to classroom
reality Peter Hyman Vintage, 2005
5Approach to strategy
School
Government
Momentum
Empowerment
broad goals
initiatives to avoid drift
Partnership
Conflict
radical policy decisions
support
Consistency
Novelty
fresh ideas
focus
6Personalising learning
Personalised learning demands that every aspect
of teaching and support is designed around a
pupils needs David Miliband,
September 2003
The challenge is to meet more needs of more
students more fully than was possible/desirable
in the past.
7Transformation is significant, systematic and
sustained change that results in high levels of
achievement for all students in all
settings Brian Caldwell
8Transformation is the transition from the
nineteenth to the twenty-first
century educational imaginary
9A social imaginary
Charles Taylor
...the inescapable idea of moral order how
we ought to live together in society.
the ways people imagine their social existence,
how they fit together with others, how things go
on between themselves and their fellows, the
expectations that are normally met the common
understanding that makes possible common
practices and a widely shared sense of
legitimacy.
10The 19C educational imaginary
- schools prepare students for their fixed station
in life
- intelligence is mono-dimensional, fixed and
innate
- schooling limited for the majority
- school is a place with clear, rigid boundaries
- roles are sharply defined and segregated
- schools and teachers are autonomous units
- education is producer-led
- school is designed and organised like a factory
- schools become similar to one another over time
11The 21C educational imaginary
- students identities and destinies are fluid
- multiple intelligences are plastic and learnable
- education is lifelong, formal and informal
- education is unconstrained by time and place
- roles are blurred and overlapping
- schools and teachers are embedded in networks
- education is user-led (but who exactly are they?)
- schools are designed for personalisation
- schools become different from one another over
time
12The PL gateways are the path to transformation
13The nine interconnected gateways to PL the
conferences and the pamphlets
Student voice
DesignOrganisation
Assessment for Learning
?
Workforce reform
Learning to learn
New technologies
MentoringCoaching
Curriculum
Adviceguidance
14Personalising learning means meeting more needs
of more students than ever before. PL is the path
to the transformation that is the educational
imaginary of the twenty-first century
15Three types of challenge
Adaptive challenge
Cultural challenge
Technical challenge
16Emerging features in development
All gateways are still under construction
No school is advanced in every gateway
Some gateways are better developed than others
The gateways interact in complex ways
Every gateway can be a radical innovation
17Gateway commonalities - their interactive effects
1. Engagement - with learning the school
2. Responsibility - for learning behaviour
3. Independence in learning - meta-cognitive
control
4. Confidence - articulate point of view
present an argument/suggestion interpersonal
skills
5. Maturity in relationships - more open and
honest with greater mutual respect
6. Co-construction of education- in the design of
teaching, learning, assessment, school life
Note the sequence!
18Questions
What are our 19th century and our 21st century
imaginaries?
How are we making the transition?
Is this approach to personalising learning
relevant to our situation?
19The Assessment for Learning gateway
20The multiple purposes of assessment include
Assessment for recording
Assessment for reporting
Assessment for selection
Assessment for learning
21Assessment for learning
is the process of identifying what the learner
has or has not achieved in order to plan the next
steps in learning
It is the process by which the teacher provides
feedback to learners on their performance in such
a way that either the teacher adjusts the
teaching in order to help students learn more
effectively or learners change their approach
to the learning task or both of these
22Through assessment for learning, the learner a
- comes to hold a concept of performance similar
to that - held by the teacher
i.e. develops the notion of a standard
- monitors the quality of his/her own performance
i.e. can compare own performance with the
standard
- sees how the quality of performance can be
improved
i.e.engages in the action that closes the
gap between own performance and the standard
23Asking questions
Normal impact of Q-and-A sessions
Question - answer - evaluation
Question - no answer - move to another student
Increase teacher wait time
Force student thinking time
Bounce the questioning
Phone a friend
24Marking work
Normal impact of marking/grading
Ignore comments
Compare with peers
Comments only - no marks or grades
Assessment by peers
- explicit mark schemes and grade criteria
- examples of work meeting range of criteria
Student self-assessment
25Assessment for learning
- leads to higher test scores
- enhances meta-cognition and
- aids learning to learn
26Questions
Should we adopt AfL?
If so, how should we do it?
What problems might we encounter and how would
we overcome them?
27The Student Voice gateway
28Student voice
How students come to have a greater say and more
active role in the construction of their
education i.e. how they are taught and how they
learn
29Versions of student voice
1. School councils and school governance
2. Students as sources of useful data
3. Students as researchers
4. Student co-constructors of education
30Questions
Do you think there is a role for student voice
in improving our schools?
If so, what action should we take?
31The Learning to Learn gateway
32Learning to learn means reflecting on ones
learning and intentionally applying the results
of ones reflection to further learning.
33L2L - 0ne approach
- making learning an object of attention
- making learning an object of conversation
- making learning an object of reflection
- making learning an object of learning
34L2L a second approach
Remembering - is able to recall
Resilience - has habit of persistence with
difficulty
Resourcefulness - uses variety of learning
strategies
Reflection - thinks about learning and
development of oneself as a learner
Reciprocity - is able to learn with other people
35All schemes have meta-cognition in common
Meta-cognition is the capacity to monitor,
evaluate, control and change how one thinks and
learns.
36L2L involves
- understanding the demands that a learning task
makes
- knowing about intellectual processes and how
they work
- generating and considering strategies to cope
with the task
- getting better at choosing the strategies that
are the most - appropriate for the task
- monitoring and evaluating the subsequent
learning - behaviour through feedback on the extent to
which - the chosen strategies have led to success with
the task.
from About Learning
37Independent learners
- become aware of the difference between memorising
and understanding material, and realise that
these require different mental strategies (can I
remember this? is this something I need to
remember? have I really grasped what this is
about? could I explain it to another person? )
- recognise which parts of the material are
difficult and demand more attention (this bit is
easy, but I need to spend more time on that bit)
- question or test themselves that they are
understanding the material (how am I doing? does
it make sense to me?)
- learn when its appropriate to seek help from the
teacher (Im stuck and the several strategies
Ive tried arent working, and I dont get the
help I need from other sources Ive tried, so I
must turn to the teacher).
38Two forms of engagement
The teacher chooses the learning objectives
directs the ways students engage with
tasksdetermines the timing and duration of
tasks decides the outcomes of learning
provides the evaluations of learning and
learners.
dependent engagement in learning
The learner chooses the purpose of the learning
selects the content decides the modes and
timing of the engagement determines the
outcomes evaluates the extent of success in
learning.
independent engagement in learning
39How might we ensure continuity and
progression in learning to learn?
40About Learningwww.demos.co.uk
41Questions
Do you think more could and should be done to
promote independent learning in students at all
levels?
If so, what action should we take?