Supreme Court of Indiana, 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Supreme Court of Indiana, 2006

Description:

Parents who refused to pay were referred to a law firm and charged ... Frank Nagy and Sonja Brackett. Mrs. Brackett's child qualified for free/reduced lunches. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: jsti8
Category:
Tags: court | indiana | sonja | supreme

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Supreme Court of Indiana, 2006


1
Nagy v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School
Corporation(EVSC)
  • Supreme Court of Indiana, 2006
  • 844 N.E. 2d 481
  • LaMorte, M. (2008). School law Cases and
    concepts (9th Ed.). Boston, MA Allyn Bacon. Pp
    100-2.
  • Jake Stiefel

2
  • EVSC charged all students K-12 a 20 fee to help
    balance the budget for years 2002 and 2003.
  • Parents who refused to pay were referred to a law
    firm and charged an additional fee up to 100.

3
  • Parents
  • Frank Nagy and Sonja Brackett
  • Mrs. Bracketts child qualified for free/reduced
    lunches.

4
  • Indiana Constitution states that school tuition
    shall be without charge.
  • EVSC argued that the fee was used for services
    such as nurses, alternative education,
    counselors, and music, speech, and athletic
    programs.

5
  • Indiana trial court ruled in favor of the school,
    accepting that the fees were not used for
    tuition.
  • Indiana Supreme Court, however, overturned the
    decision and held

6
  • 1)The services used as examples by EVSC are
    considered part of a public education, but this
    does not prohibit schools from charging for
    individual programs.

7
  • 2)All students were charged, regardless if they
    used the services or not, and the money was
    deposited into the schools general fund.

8
  • Therefore
  • The 20 was a blanket charge to all students,
    which the court considered to fall under the term
    tuition.

9
  • This case set precedent in Indiana, as it was
    tested against the language of Indianas
    Constitution. The opinion and reasoning, however,
    may be applied to similar cases by courts in
    other states.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com