Bez nadpisu

1
6th Framework Programme
Participation of the Slovak Republic in FP6
Nitra - Beladice, April 2005 Peter Ondrejcek
Viera Jozsová Martina Kedrová Margita Kika
Slimáková Peter Lobotka
2
6th Framework Programme
Slovak institutions are involved in 745
submitted projects gt Increase by 35
The overall number of SK institutions in the
submitted projects is 850. gt Increase by
10
3
6th Framework Programme

• The increase is due to
• expanded activities of NCPs
• improved awareness (predominantly at
  Universities)
• established contacts and experience gathered
  during FP5

4
6th Framework Programme
in FP5 it was 27
5
6th Framework Programme

• Lower success rate due to
• increased number of excellent project proposals
• difficulties encountered in joining IP or NoE
  by Slovak institutions
• insufficient budget provided for STREPs and
  CRAFT

6
6th Framework Programme
Participation according to priority
7
6th Framework Programme

• Top 3 priorities in SK
• NMP
• SUSTDEV
• FOOD
• In FP5 it was biotechnology

8
6th Framework Programme
Only 8 of the projects originates in the
Slovak Republic Most of these coordinators is
coming from Universities
9
6th Framework Programme
projects vs. tools
CA 14
IP 34
NoE 13
SSA 47
STREP 32
CRAFT 6
10
6th Framework Programme
New instruments of projects
11
6th Framework Programme
IP NoE STREP CRAFT 58 SSA CA
42
12
6th Framework Programme
Number of submitted / approved projects
13
6th Framework Programme
Research / Industry
14
6th Framework Programme
Input versus output SK contribution into FP6
in 2003 3,5 MEur Funds gained back after the
first calls 2,4 MEur
15
6th Framework Programme
Distribution of the funds (after 1st calls)
Others 6
SAS 39
RD 25
SME 14
UNI 16
16
6th Framework Programme
Ranking of SK among the others PL, CZ, HU, SI,
LT, LV, EE, MT, CY, TR, BG, RO
17
6th Framework Programme
Number of approved projects in selected countries
18
6th Framework Programme
SK in FP6

• Conclusions
• Increased activities by 35 compared with FP5
• Decreased success rate from 27 down to 19
• The most successful priorities are NMP, SUSTDEV,
  and FOOD
• Most of the funded projects is coming from UNI,
  but most funds flows to SAS.

19
6th Framework Programme

• Conclusions cont.
• Low number of projects coordinated by SK (8 )
• Relatively satisfactory participation in IPs a
  NoEs
• Volume of supporting projects is too high (40 )
• Low participation of industry
• After 1st calls SK is loosing money

20
6th Framework Programme
Mr. Peter Ondrejcek SARC, Staré grunty 52, SK-
842 44 Bratislava   ondrejcek_at_sarc.sk   Telephone
421 2 6542 1826 Fax 421 2
6542 0308 www.sarc.sk 
21
6th Framework Programme
approved projects
Others 27
SAS 40
Industry 3
SME 42
UNI 49
RD 17