Pest Risk Analysis PRA Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Pest Risk Analysis PRA Training

Description:

Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment. Step 1: Pest Categorization ... A risk assessment of Pest x suggests that unless measures are taken it is very ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: grif82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pest Risk Analysis PRA Training


1
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)
CFIA-ACIA
2
Stages
  • Stage 1 Initiation
  • Stage 2 Pest Risk Assessment
  • Step 1 Pest Categorization
  • Step 2 Assessment of the Probability of
    Introduction and Spread
  • Step 3 Impacts
  • Step 4 Overall Assessment of Risk
  • Step 5 Uncertainty
  • Stage 3 Pest Risk Management

3
Pest risk analysis
  • Stage 1 (initiation) asked
  • What bad thing can happen?
  • Stage 2 (pest risk assessment) asked
  • How likely is it to happen?
  • How bad will it be?
  • Does it matter? Is the risk acceptable?
  • Stage 3 (pest risk management) asks
  • What can be done about it?

Pest identity
Overall pest risk
Response to risk
4
Stage 3 Pest Risk Management
  • Conclusions of pest risk assessment
  • Risk acceptable? PRA ends
  • Risk unacceptable? PRA continues

Stop
  • Identifying options
  • Evaluating options
  • Selecting options

5
Conclusion of pest risk assessment
  • Level of risk can be expressed in various ways
  • Reference to existing phytosanitary requirements
  • Indexed to estimated economic losses
  • Expressed on a scale of risk tolerance
  • Compared to the risk presented by the same pest
    at a different time
  • Compared with the level of risk accepted by other
    countries
  • Compared with the level of risk accepted for
    other pests

6
Acceptability of risk
  • Acceptable level of risk is established by the
    NPPO
  • When might risk be acceptable?
  • Level of risk is so low that specific treatment
    is not cost effective
  • Level of risk is no greater than that already
    experienced
  • Cost of mitigation is excessive compared to the
    benefit
  • When is risk unacceptable?
  • Pest incursion would result in economic,
    environmental or social consequences

7
Risk is unacceptable
  • Western corn rootworm in DE
  • Spreading in nearby countries
  • High potential impact due to crop losses over
    large area, increasing maize production
  • Natural man-made spread
  • Unacceptable risk
  • Next steps
  • Stage 2 Pest risk management
  • Identify appropriate mitigation measures, if any

8
Pest risk management
  • A structured analysis of measures that can be
    recommended to minimize risks posed by a pest or
    pathway
  • Measures can be implemented
  • to the growing crop
  • to the harvested commodity
  • to associated materials
  • Measures can be implemented
  • at origin or in the exporting country
  • at the point of entry
  • within the importing country or invaded area

9
Pest risk management
  • Consider all pathways
  • Traded plants or plant products
  • Natural spread of the pest
  • Entry with human travellers
  • Vehicular transport
  • Associated materials
  • Identify points at which mitigation measures
    might be applied
  • Identify possible mitigation measures at each
    point
  • Assess each for effectiveness, efficiency,
    feasibility .
  • Select appropriate measure(s)

10
Mitigation points
Country of Origin
In Transit
Country of Destination
Nursery or Orchard
Packing House
Containers
Plantation
Port of Arrival
11
Mitigation points
Country of Origin
In Transit
Country of Destination
? Place ? Crop ? Commodity ? Pathway
? Storage Facility ? Container(s) ?
Transport (ship, train, truck )
? Commodity ? Pathway ? Place ? Other
12
Country of origin
  • Place/area of production measures
  • General or pest-specific surveillance
  • Historic data
  • Official measures to maintain pest-free status
  • Crop measures
  • Treatment of the crop, field or place of
    production
  • Growing plants under protected conditions to
    prevent infestation of the crop
  • Specifying time of harvest
  • Phytosanitary certification

13
Country of origin
  • Commodity Measures
  • Inspection or laboratory tests
  • Prohibition of parts of the host
  • Restricting the composition of a consignment
  • Pre-shipment quarantine
  • Specified conditions for preparing the
    consignment
  • Treatment for removal of pest(s)
  • Pathway measures
  • Targeted inspections, publicity and fines or
    incentives
  • Measures for machinery, modes of transportation,
    or packaging

14
In transit
  • Commodity Measures
  • Storage conditions may be specified
  • Temperature, packaging, separation from other
    specified plants etc.
  • Fumigation or other chemical treatment on board
    ship
  • Ship inspection before loading or at destination

15
Country of destination
  • Commodity Measures
  • Inspection of consignments at the point of entry
  • Treat the consignment to kill living pests
  • Contain imported consignments to limit spread of
    introduced pests
  • Post-entry quarantine
  • Limit use, distribution, or timing of consignments

16
Country of destination
  • Prohibition of a specific commodity from specific
    source
  • Only if no treatments or inspection techniques
    are available and effective in reducing risk to
    acceptable levels
  • A measure of last resort
  • IPPC principles of necessity, science-based,
    managed risk and minimal impact

17
Other measures
  • Document
  • Phytosanitary Certificates
  • Import permits
  • IPPC stamp for SWP
  • Phytosanitary Certificates
  • Official assurance that specified import
    requirements are met
  • Confirms that risk management measures have been
    taken
  • Only for regulated articles
  • Educate
  • Educate inform travellers, importers, industry,
    government or public

18
Selecting appropriate measures
  • Phytosanitary measures should be
  • cost-effective feasible
  • no more trade-restrictive than necessary
  • not imposed if existing measures are effective
  • Different measures with the same effect should be
    accepted as alternatives
  • For pests under official control in PRA area,
    import measures should be no more restrictive
    than measures applied within PRA area

Cost-effectiveness Feasibility Minimal
Impact Equivalence Non-discrimination
19
Evaluating options
  • Evaluate each option for
  • Effectiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Feasibility
  • Reproducibility
  • Potential negative social, economic or
    environmental consequences

20
Pest risk analysis
  • Stage 1 (initiation) asked
  • What bad thing can happen?
  • Stage 2 (pest risk assessment) asked
  • How likely is it to happen?
  • How bad will it be?
  • Does it matter? Is the risk acceptable?
  • Stage 3 (pest risk management) asks
  • What can be done about it?

Pest identity
Overall pest risk
Response to risk
21
Selecting options
22
Risk management example
Country of Origin
Country of Destination
Nursery
Packing House
Ship
Plantation
Port of Arrival
23
Risk management example
Country of Origin
Country of Destination
Nursery
Packing House
Ship
Plantation
Port of Arrival
24
Conclusion of Stage 3
  • Risk mitigation measures have been
  • Identified
  • Evaluated
  • Selected
  • Mitigation measures to reduce risk to acceptable
    level are selected, or
  • No mitigation measures are available

25
Conclusion of PRA
  • Pest risk management conclusion
  • selection of one of more options or series of
    options, OR
  • no suitable mitigation measures available
  • PRA ends
  • options form the basis of phytosanitary
    regulations or requirements

26
Costs and Benefits
  • The cost-benefit analysis for each of the
    minimum measures found to provide acceptable
    security may be estimated. Those measures with an
    acceptable benefit-to-cost ratio should be
    considered.
  • How is this done? What does cost-benefit mean?

27
Costs and Benefits
  • Costs costs of measure(s) applied
  • Industry costs determined from additional costs
    / increased labour costs
  • Government costs staff costs to apply and
    monitor measures
  • Benefits avoiding the losses that the pest
    would otherwise cause

28
Costs and Benefits example
  • A risk assessment of Pest x suggests that unless
    measures are taken it is very likely to be
    carried on imported host plants from the country
    of origin to the PRA area where it is very likely
    to transfer to crops and cause yield losses of
    100 ha-1 year-1.
  • Based on spread elsewhere it is likely that the
    entire crop area of 10,000 ha would be infested
    within 5 years.

29
Costs and Benefits example
  • Four options are considered
  • 1. Source plants from a pest free area
  • But exporting country cannot establish a PFA
  • 2. Parts of plants (e.g. leaves) prohibited
  • But will add cost (10,000 year-1)
  • 3. Inspect crop at origin, apply appropriate
    chemical treatment if needed, inspect
    consignments before export and certify pest free
  • But will add cost (40,000 year-1)
  • 4. Post entry quarantine
  • But will add cost (300,000 year-1)

30
Costs and Benefits example
31
Costs and Benefits example
  • In the short term (5 years) the cost of applying
    measures will be
  • Option 2 50,000 (partly effective)
  • Option 3 200,000 (partly effective)
  • Option 4 1,500,000 (fully effective)
  • Option 2 3 250,000 (fully effective)
  • The expected cost (5 years) of not applying
    measures are estimated to be 10,000 infested ha
    at a cost of 100/ha 1,000,000

32
Costs and Benefits example
33
Pest Risk Management
Pest/pathway
  • Risk mitigation measures are
  • Identified
  • Evaluated
  • Selected
  • Pest risk is acceptable
  • PRA ends

Pest risk assessment
Pest risk management
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com