Ethical and Legal Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Ethical and Legal Issues

Description:

Ethics: what one should or should not do, according to principles or norms of conduct ... Use the four-fifths rule: a selection rate of any race, sex, or ethnic group ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: marciab7
Category:
Tags: ethical | fifths | issues | legal

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethical and Legal Issues


1
Ethical and Legal Issues
  • Chapter 16

2
Ethics vs. Law
  • Ethics what one should or should not do,
    according to principles or norms of conduct
  • Law what one must or must not do, according to
    legal dictates

3
Ethical Use of Tests
  • Competence
  • develop competence in assessment concepts and
    methods
  • recognize boundaries of competence
  • Informed consent
  • client/subject must voluntarily consent
  • psychologist must inform client about nature and
    purpose of assessment in understandable language

4
Ethical use of tests
  • Knowledge of results
  • must fully disclose test results in
    understandable language
  • Confidentiality
  • test results are confidential information
  • release of results should only be made to another
    qualified professional after clients consent

5
Ethical Use of Tests
  • Test security
  • Materials kept securely
  • Test items are not revealed except in training
    programs and when mandated by law
  • Automated Scoring/Interpretation Systems
  • Psychologist is still responsible for proper
    interpretation of test results

6
Guidelines of the EEOC (Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission)
  • 14th amendment guarantees all citizens due
    process and equal protection under the law.
  • In 1964, the Civil Rights Act was passed.
  • In 1970, guidelines were released by the EEOC
    regarding fair employee selection procedures.
  • In 1978, the guidelines were revised and
    published. They affect most public employment
    and institutions that receive government funds.
  • Civil Rights Act again revised in 1991

7
EEOC says selection procedures may not have an
adverse impact.
  • Use the four-fifths rule a selection rate of
    any race, sex, or ethnic group which is less than
    4/5 or 80 of the rate for the group with the
    highest rate will generally be regarded as
    evidence of adverse impact.
  • If violated, the employer has to demonstrate that
    extenuating circumstances make the standard
    unreasonable and that selection has adequate
    validity
  • Use of subgroup norms is not acceptable

8
EEOC Guidelines to Criterion-related Validity
  • Is it technically feasible? -- how large a
    sample is needed and do we have it?
  • Analysis of the job -- what work behaviors are
    important? Consider possible bias in both the
    selection of the criterion measure and their
    application.
  • Criterion measures Do they represent important
    work behavior or work outcomes? Can
    automatically use production rate, error rate,
    tardiness, absenteeism and length of service.
  • Representativeness of sample are sample
    subjects representative of the candidates
    normally available? Make sure to consider jobs
    performed, length of time on the job, and other
    factors likely to affect validity differences

9
EEOC Guidelines to Criterion-related Validity -
continued
  • Statistical relationship 05 level of
    significance used?
  • Operational use of selection procedures Is the
    correlation statistically significant simply due
    to sample size? Is this the only measure used
    (multiple measures are better) ?
  • Overstatement of validity findings Were
    procedures used that capitalized on chance? Use
    large samples and cross validation.
  • Fairness Studies mainly limited to large
    organizations that have enough people in a job
    class.
  • Unfairness is when one group obtains lower scores
    on a selection procedure than members of another
    group AND the differences are not reflect in
    differences in a measure of job performance.

10
Lawsuits in Education
  • Stell v. Savannah-Chatham County Board of
    Education Board argued that African-American
    children didnt have the abilities to be in the
    same classrooms as whites based on IQ scores
  • Hobson v. Hansen Psychological tests used to
    place African-Americans into basic track and
    whites into more advanced tracks
  • Diana v. State Board of Education Placed in
    special education based on tests administered in
    English

11
Lawsuits in Education
  • Larry P. v. Wilson Riles Argued that any test
    that assigns disproportionate numbers of children
    from one race to an EMR category is racist and
    discriminatory
  • Parents in Action on Special Education v. Hannon
    same issue as Larry P. but different outcome
  • Crawford et al. v. Honig et al. Follow-up to
    Larry P. case where same judge reversed himself

12
Lawsuits in Education
  • Debra P. v. Turlington Argued that African
    Americans were disproportionately affected by a
    minimum competency test needed to graduate
  • GI Forum v. TEA Same argument, except for Texas
  • Bakke v. Regents of the University of California
    First lawsuit that signals a change in attitude
    about affirmative action

13
Lawsuits in Industry
  • Griggs v. Duke Power Lawsuit that began the
    requirement to show tests were related to job
  • Wards Cove Packing Company v. Antonio Reversed
    Griggs v. Duke Power. Spurred Congress to change
    the Civil Rights Act.

14
Test Administration and Validity
  • Detroit Edison Co. v. NLRB Plaintiff wanted to
    see copy of test he scored low on to see if there
    was an error in scoring
  • Connecticut v. Teal Issue of discrimination
    when there had been no adverse impact
  • Association of Mexican-American Educators v.
    California Teacher certification test had
    higher failure rates for Mexican Americans.

15
Americans with Disabilities Act and Testing
  • Section 504 reads A recipient (of federal
    funds) shall make reasonable accommodations to
    the known physical or mental limitations of an
    otherwise qualified handicapped applicant or
    employee unless the recipient can demonstrate
    that the accommodation would impose an undue
    hardship on the operation of its program.
  • Some interpret this to mean that extra time or
    other accommodations should be allowed in
    completion of psychological or achievement tests.

16
ADA and Testing
  • APA Standards emphasize a standardized
    administration.
  • Brookhart v. Illinois State Board of Education
    Accommodations for disabled must be made in
    completing a minimum competency test for
    graduation but test didnt have to be modified
    substantially.
  • Reader to assist learning-disabled boy on
    statewide graduation test Reader could be used
    on portions of test that didnt measure reading
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com