Title: WBCSD Position on Sustainable Development Reporting Initiatives
1WBCSD Position on Sustainable Development
Reporting Initiatives
- This document determines the policy of WBCSD for
addressing guidance initiatives of other
organizations in the area of corporate
sustainable development reporting.
2Fundamental issues
- WBCSD believes that there will be an increasing
demand for corporate sustainable development
reporting and dialogue with numerous stakeholders - WBCSD recognizes that on a medium/long term a
high demand for standardized or normalized
sustainable development performance information
from companies is most likely. - WBCSD finds it of key importance that businesses
influence the framework conditions for SDR as an
emerging corporate undertaking. - As a leading business voice on SD and business,
WBCSD should establish and maintain influence,
where appropriate.
3Creating a WBCSD position on GRI
- We have a collection of members viewpoints and
opinions on GRI Guidelines (technical content) - We need to develop a position on GRI as a
permanent institution
4Principles and criteria for engagement
Principles
Engagement
Criteria
5Principles
- Maintain WBCSD Reputation
- Applicability
- Balance
- The WBCSD will not engage in any initiative that
puts the understanding of WBCSD function and
reputation at an unacceptable risk. - Guidelines should be reasonably suitable to allow
individual companies to report their SD business
case - Preference to guidance that are created via a
multi-stakeholder approach
6Criteria
- Strategic fit
- 1. Mission
- 2. Outreach
- 3. Make a difference
- Is the initiative and its subject matter in
accordance with the WBCSD mission - Is the initiative international regional or
global. - Is the initiative likely to influence the SD
Reporting agenda - because of its scale of
significance and support, or its innovative
level, approach or content
7Criteria
- Due processes
Does the issuing organization follow due
processes to ensure that relevant and legitimate
parties and viewpoints are considered in such a
way that provides inclusiveness and transparency,
with regards to
- 4. Overseeing and governing bodies e.g.
- 5. Processes applied to select topics, and
developing and issuing guidance
- Processes relate to aspects such as
- selection/appointment of members e.g.
- decision making
- There should be a clear recognition of which
parties and/or stakeholder-groups that any person
represent
8Criteria
- recognition
This criteria is expected to be increasingly
applied as the SD Reporting agenda matures
- 6. Is the initiative generally recognized. This
means that society in general subscribes to it
(like generally accepted accounting standards).
- It is assumed that because of their emerging
nature no initiative could today claim to be
generally recognized - (In the meantime the criteria Due Processes will
substitute)
All criteria should be met to a reasonable extent
9Role of engagement
- The extent and depth of WBCSD engagement is
derived from the degree to which the engagement
advances the achievement of the WBCSDs mission. - WBCSD does not enter or agree to positions on any
reporting guidelines, standards or criteria that
in fact, nor in appearance, are binding to
members of the WBCSD. - WBCSD should regularly review its position
towards certain guidance, standards or criteria
in light of the degree of uptake, endorsement or
subscription, or support for those criteria in
question, by members of WBCSD. - WBCSD supports that financing has to be balanced
reflecting a multi-stakeholder approach.
10WBCSD engagement
Matrix on engagement role and means
WBCSD may engage in various aspects within the
initiative or undertaking, such as governance,
strategy and policy, as well as technical content
and processes.
11Process and timeline for issuing of WBCSD Policy
Paper
- March 29 High level presentation to LDs
- April 22 Final draft to LDs for comments
- May 22 Deadline for comments from LD
- May 29 Submission of final paper to Exco
- June 12 Exco to approve policy