Towards a Single Equality Scheme - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Towards a Single Equality Scheme

Description:

Equality Challenge Unit supports the higher education sector in its mission to ... advise equality and human resources practitioners in HE. Offering sector-wide ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: chris343
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Towards a Single Equality Scheme


1
Towards a Single Equality Scheme
  • Chris Brill Policy Adviser

2
Mission statement
  • Equality Challenge Unit supports the higher
    education sector in its mission to realise the
    potential of all staff and students whatever
    their race, gender, disability, sexual
    orientation, religion and belief or age, to the
    benefit of those individuals, higher education
    institutions and society.

3
The higher education context
  • Unequal representation issues of equality
  • Subject segregation
  • Declaration of disability (2)
  • Long hours culture and flexible working
  • Pay gap (14)
  • Lack of data (sexual orientation, religion and
    belief)

4
How we work with the sector
  • Working with individual higher education
    institutions, we
  • respond to questions from HEIs,
  • visit HEIs, particularly to talk to governing
    bodies and senior management teams
  • advise equality and human resources practitioners
    in HE
  • Offering sector-wide advice, we
  • provide generic informative and interpretative
    advice

5
UNISON and the higher education sector
  • Equal pay for work of equal value
  • Better pay and conditions
  • An end to low pay
  • Fair and equal treatment for part-time, term-time
    and temporary staff
  • Access to training and career opportunities for
    all staff
  • An end to discrimination in higher education

6
Work with UNISON
  • Gender Equality Duty Conferences
  • DIGNITY AT WORK Bullying and Harassment
  • Disability Equality Duty
  • Staff Race Forum

7
Structure
  • Legislative background
  • Function
  • What to include
  • Involvement and consultation
  • Advantages and disadvantages
  • Discussion

8
Legislative background
  • 3 Duties
  • Race equality duty
  • Disability equality duty
  • Gender equality duty
  • Equality Act 2006
  • Equality/Fairness Bill?

9
Function
  • Planning and action
  • Provide focus
  • Extend to age, religion and belief and sexual
    orientation?

10
What to include
  • Equality Impact Assessment
  • Action planning
  • Data gathering
  • Staff disclosure project
  • LGBT research
  • Equality HEIDI
  • State of the Sector
  • Involvement of various communities of interest

11
Intersections and complexity
Source Equalities Review 2007
12
Involvement and Consultation (1)
  • Not just particular equality groups but all staff
    and students affected
  • EOC Code of Practice
  • DRC Code of Practice states that disabled people
    should be involved
  • Taking involvement to the next level project
  • Staff Trade Unions
  • Student Unions

13
Involvement and Consultation (2)
  • Involve Senior Management
  • Senior Management Champion
  • Introductory Endorsement
  • Scheme embedded in strategy, mission or plan

14
Advantages
  • Encourage institutions to develop their own
    solutions
  • Identify meaningful equality priorities
  • Align equality with institutions strategic plan
  • Multiple identities
  • Demonstrate commonality of experience

15
Disadvantages
  • Too much procedure?
  • Trevor Phillips The race duty has resulted
    in an approach that places more importance on
    strict compliance with processes than on
    delivering real outcomes.
  • Promote hierarchy of equality groups?
  • May water down differences?
  • Varying timetable may lead to confusion
  • Mere compliance

16
Typical omissions or mistakes (1)
  • Priorities not based on data
  • Very long preamble
  • Doesnt cover all strands even though it says it
    does
  • Too long
  • Action plans not SMART

17
Typical omissions and mistakes (2)
  • No added value in bringing together the schemes
    as one
  • A minimal approach
  • Very broad-brush for each strand
  • Not structured logically

18
Discussion
  • Questions
  • Sharing best practice
  • What difficulties have you faced?
  • How have these been tackled?

19
  • 7th Floor Queens House
  • 55/56 Lincoln's Inn Fields
  • London
  • WC2A 3LJ
  • Tel 0207 438 1010
  • Fax 0207 438 1011
  • www.ecu.ac.uk
  • Email chris.brill_at_ecu.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com