Singularities in solid mechanics: An engineering perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Singularities in solid mechanics: An engineering perspective

Description:

Typical crack growth data. November, 2002. Oberwolfach. 9 ... Cracked panel: Topology and BCs. So. L = 30.0' S = 6.0' H = 0.7' W = 0.7' R = 0.25' t = 0.25' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: barna
Learn more at: https://sc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Singularities in solid mechanics: An engineering perspective


1
Singularities in solid mechanics An engineering
perspective
Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut
Oberwolfach November 3-9, 2002
  • Barna Szabó
  • Center for Computational Mechanics
  • Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

2
Outline
  • Singularities in solid mechanics
  • Regularity
  • Relationship to failure laws
  • Linear models of failure
  • Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM)
  • Generalizations
  • Nonlinear models
  • Examples

3
Failure criteria
  • Failure of materials is an essentially nonlinear
    phenomenon
  • Very large and highly localized straining occurs,
    placing it outside of the scope of continuum
    mechanics (formation and coalescence of voids)
  • Under what conditions can we depend on linear
    computations to predict failure?
  • Example Linear elastic fracture mechanics
  • Obstacles to generalizations

4
Notation
5
The L-shaped domain
The von Mises stress corresponding
to K1K21.000 Geometric mesh, p8, trunk space.
6
Assumptions
7
Prediction of crack propagation
8
Typical crack growth data
9
Spoiler of Boeing 7x7 aircraft
10
Cracked panel Topology and BCs
So
So
L 30.0 S 6.0 H 0.7 W 0.7 R 0.25 t
0.25 So 10 ksi
Material
1/4-solid model
11
Cracked panel Meshing
Crack in First Bay
Crack in DCF
Crack in Fillet
Crack in Second Bay
12
Crack in DCF Details
(xc, yc) system of ellipse
13
Crack in bay 1 a1.00
Y
Kmax20360
K1 along crack front
Convergence of K1
14
Crack in fillet 1 a2.65
a10.250 c10.400 c 0.308
Kmax26370
K1 along crack front
Convergence of K1
15
Results for crack in DCF a3.05
a10.650 c10.850 c 0.785
Kmax32710
K1 along crack front
16
Results for crack in DCF a3.20
a10.80 c11.15 c 0.95
Kmax38480
K1 along crack front
17
Seq for crack in DCF a3.35
von Mises stress
18
Generalization
19
Case 1 Isotropic without adhesive
ta2tp
20
Case 1 Linear solution
PL1000 S_eq4.08E5
21
Case 1 Nonlinear Solution
PL1000
PL2000
PL3000
PL4000
PL5000
Scale 12
22
Case 1 Nonlinear solution
PL5000 S_eq8.33E5
23
Case 2 Isotropic with adhesive (2D)
tp
ta
Elastic-plastic
tp
24
Case 2 Nonlinear solution (2D)
PL1000
PL2000
PL3000
Scale 11
25
Case 2 Adhesive stresses (2D)
PL1000
PL2000
PL3000
Note Cannot compute larger load because the
elements around the singularities become too
distorted and stiffness generation fails.
26
Case 2b Alternative meshing
46-element mesh
27
Case 2b Nonlinear solution (2D)
PL1000
PL2000
PL3000
PL3500
Scale 12
28
Case 2b Adhesive stresses (2D)
PL1000
PL2000
PL3000
PL3500
Note Cannot take larger load because the
adhesive is fully plastic
29
Case 2b Nonlinear - Extrusion
PL1000
PL2000
PL3000
PL3500
30
Closing remarks
  • With the notable exception of LEFM, and the
    J-integral, defined for the deformation theory of
    plasticity, the asymptotic expansions at
    singularities are not being used in predictions
    of failure initiation
  • Lack of reliable experimental data
  • LEFM is applicable under clearly defined
    conditions only.
  • Data are generated from standard test specimen
  • Generalization to 3D is tenuous, but nothing
    better is available, or likely to become
    available
  • Alternative criteria are being developed, based
    on average stress on a reference area.
  • Anisotropic strength consideration
  • Geometric and material nonlinearities must be
    considered
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com