Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams

Description:

Theoretical aspects of Coulomb excitation ... Shape isomer, E0 transition. Configuration mixing: | = |o | p. 74Kr. If. Ii. In. 0 0 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: wolfram9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams


1
Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
  • Motivation and introduction
  • Theoretical aspects of Coulomb excitation
  • Experimental considerations, set-ups and analysis
    techniques
  • Recent highlights and future perspectives

Lecture given at the Euroschool 2009 in
Leuven Wolfram KORTEN CEA Saclay
2
Coulomb excitation theory - the general approach
b
target
r (w) a (e sinh w 1) t (w) a/v? (e cosh
w w) a Zp Zt e2 E-1
r(t)
projectile
  • Solving the time-dependent Schrödinger
    equation
  • ih d?(t)/dt HP HT V (r(t)) ?(t)
  • with HP/T being the free Hamiltonian of the
    projectile/target nucleus
  • and V(t) being the time-dependent
    electromagnetic interaction
  • (remark often only target or projectil
    excitation are treated)
  • Expanding ?(t) ?n an(t) ?n with ?n as the
    eigenstates of HP/T
  • leads to a set of coupled equations for the
  • time-dependent excitation amplitudes an(t)
  • ih dan(t)/dt ?m??nV(t) ?m? expi/h (En-Em)
    t am(t)
  • The transition amplitude bnm are calculated by
    the (action) integral
  • bnm ih-1 ? ?an?nV(t) am?m? expi/h (En-Em)
    t dt
  • Finally leading to the excitation probability
  • P(In?Im) (2In1)-1bnm2

3
Coulomb excitation theory - the general approach
  • The coupled equations for an(t) are usually
    solved by a multipole expansion
  • of the electromagnetic interaction V(r(t))
  • VP-T(r) ZTZPe2/r monopole-monopole
    (Rutherford) term
  • ?lm VP(El,m) electric multipole-monopole
    target excitation,
  • ?lm VT(El,m) electric multipole-monopole
    project. excitation,
  • ?lm VP(Ml,m) magnetic multipole
    project./target excitation ?lm
    VT(Ml,m) (but small at low v/c)
  • O(sl,slgt0) higher order
    multipole-multipole terms (small)
  • VP/T(El,m) (-1)m ZT/Pe 4p/(2l1)
    r(l1)Ylm(?,?) MP/T(El,m)
  • VP/T(Ml,m) (-1)m ZT/Pe 4p/(2l1) i/cl
    r(l1)dr/dtLYl,m(?,?) MP/T(Ml,m)
  • electric multipole moment
  • M(El,m) ? r(r) rl Ylm(r) d3r
  • magnetic multipole moment
  • M(Ml,m) -i/c(l1) ? j(r) rl (ir??)Yl,m(r)
    d3r
  • Coulomb excitation cross section is sensitive to
    electric multipole moments
  • of all orders, while angular correlations give
    also access to magnetic moments

4
Nuclear shapes and electric multipole moments
  • Electric multipole moments can be linked to
  • Deformation parameters of the nuclear mass
    distribution
  • For axially symmetric shapes (bl al0) and a
    homogenous density distribution r
  • the quadrupole, octupole and hexadecupole moments
    (Q2,Q3,Q4) become

5
Transition rates in the Coulomb excitation process
  • 1st order perturbation theory
  • applicable if only one state is excited, e.g.
    0?2 excitation,
  • and for small excitation probability (e.g.
    semi-magic nuclei)
  • ? 1st order transition probability for
    multipolarity l

Strength parameter
Orbital integrals
Adiabacity parameter
6
Strength parameter ?E2 as function of (Zp,ZT)
7
Orbital integrals R(E2) as function of ? and ?
8
Cross section for Coulomb excitation
Differential and total cross sections
9
Angular distribution functions for different
multipolarities
dfsl(?)
10
Total cross sections for different multipolarities
B(sl) values for single particle like
transitions (W.u.) Bsp(l) (2l1)
9e2/4p(3l)-2 R2l x 10(hc/MpR0)2 B(sl)
e2bl 208Pb E1 6.45 10-4 A2/3 2.3 10-2 E2 5.94
10-6 A4/3 7.3 10-3 E3 5.94 10-8 A2 2.6 10-3 E4
6.28 10-10A8/3 9.5 10-4 M1 1.79 M2 0.0594
A2/3 2.08
fEl(?)
fMl(?)
11
Transition rates in the Coulomb excitation process
  • Second order perturbation theory
  • becomes necessary if several states can be
    excited from the ground state or when multiple
    excitations are possible
  • i.e. for larger excitation probabilities
  • ? 2nd order transition probability for
    multipolarity l

12
Second order perturbation theory (cont.)
P(22) often negligible unless direct excitation
through ?i?f small/forbidden
13
Shape coexistence and excited 0 states
  • 0 states can only be excited via an intermediate
    2 state (?if(E0) 0)

oblate
prolate
Shape isomer, E0 transition Configuration mixing
? ? ? o ? ? p ?
14
Examples of double-step E2 excitations
  • 0 states can only be excited via an intermediate
    2 state (?if(E0) 0)

15
Examples of double-step E2 excitations
  • 4 states can be excited through
  • a double-step E2 or a direct E4 excitation

16
Double-step E2 vs. E4 excitation of 4 states
p4 and d functions for different scattering
angles and ?1- ?2 ratios
17
Application to double-step (E2) excitations
  • Double-step excitations are important if ?if ltlt
    ?in ?nf ? P(22) gt P(12)
  • 0 states can only be excited via an intermediate
    2 state (?if 0)
  • ? P(2) ?0?22 ?2?02 p0(q,s,?) with
    p0(q,s,?) 25/4 (R202G202)
  • with ? ?1 ?2 and s ?1/(?1 ?2)
  • P(2) (qp, ?1?2?0) ? 5/4 ?0?22 ?2?02
  • 4 states are usually excited through a
    double-step E2 since the direct E4 excitation is
    small
  • ? P(2) ?0?22 ?2?42 p4(q,s,?) with
    p4(q,s,?) 25/4 (R242G242)
  • P(2) (qp, ?1?2 ? 0) ? 5/14 ?0?22 ?2?42

18
The reorientation effect
  • Specific case of second order perturbation theory
  • where the intermediate states are the m
    substates of the
  • state of interest ? 2nd order excitation
    probability for 2 state

reorientation effect
19
Strength of the reorientation effect
sensitive to diagonal matrix elements ? intrinsic
properties of final state quadrupole moment
including sign
20
Quadrupole deformation of nuclear ground states
Coulomb excitation can, in principal, map the
shape of all atomic nuclei ? Quadrupole (and
higher-order multipole moments) of Igt½ states
M. Girod, CEA
21
Quadrupole deformation and sum rules
Model-independent method to determine charge
distribution parameters (Q,d) from a (full) set
of E2 matrix elements
Q2
Q3 cos3d
  • ground state shape can be determined by a full
    set of E2 matrix elements
  • i.e. linking the ground state to all
    collective 2 states

22
Multi-step Coulomb excitation
Possible if ? gtgt 1 (no perturbative
treatment) Example Rotational band in a
strongly deformed nucleus
23
Coulomb excitation the different energy regimes
Low-energy regime (lt 5 MeV/u)
High-energy regime (gtgt5 MeV/u)
Energy cut-off
Spin cut-off Lmax up to 30? mainly single-step
excitations
Cross section d?/d? ?IiM(sl)If? ?l
(Zpe2/ hc)2 B(sl, 0?l) differential integral
Luminosity low mg/cm2 targets high g/cm2
targets Beam intensity high gt103 pps low a
few pps
Comprehensive study of low-lying exitations
First exploration of excited states in very
exotic nuclei
24
Summary
  • Coulomb excitation probability P(Ip) increases
    with
  • increasing strength parameter (?), i.e. ZP/T,
    B(sl), 1/D, qcm
  • decreasing adiabacity parameter (?), i.e. DE,
    a/v?
  • Differential cross sections ds(q)/dW show
  • varying maxima depending on multipolarity l and
    adiabacity parameter ?
  • ? allows to distinguish different
    multipolarities (E2/M1, E2/E4 etc.)
  • Total cross section stot decreases
  • with increasing adiabacity parameter ? and
    multipolarity l
  • is generally smaller for magnetic than for
    electric transitions
  • Second and higher order effects
  • lead to virtual excitations influencing the
    real excitation probabilities
  • allow to excite 0 states and to measure static
    moments
  • lead to multi-step excitations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com