Z-06-07 (Nye/Neal)

1
Z-06-07 (Nye/Neal)

• One application to rezone approximately 44 acres
  from RU-4 to TR-36 for purposes of establishing
  two residential subdivisions with a total of 44
  proposed dwelling units in the Babocomari Plan
  Area.

2
Summary of Requests
Z-06-06 Z-06-06
Parcel 106-15-021D (Nye) 106-15-021P (Neal)
Parcel Size 36 acres 8 acres
Existing Zoning RU-4 RU-4
Proposed Zoning TR-36 TR-36
Growth Category B B
Plan Designation LDR-1 LDR-1
Number of Units 36 8
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
106-15-021P (Neal) / Southward View
6
106-15-021D (Nye) / Southwestward View
7
Water Budget

• RU-4 projected consumption (11 lots) 10
  ac-ft/yr
• TR-36 projected consumption (44
  lots)10ac-ft/yr???
• ADWR urban standard of 110 gpcd vs. 312 gpcd for
  RU-4
• Building Envelopes 15,000 sq. ft.
• Turf Limits
• Drought-Tolerant Landscaping
• Hot Water Recirculation
• Storm Water Recharge
• Septic System Recharge
• Mesquite Removal nixed
• Northern Sunrise Water Company

8

• Protests and Support
• None to date

9
Factors Favoring Approval

• 1. Rezoning to TR-36 in areas designated as LDR-1
  achieves a gross density no greater than one
  house per acre and is in substantial conformance
  with the Babocomari Area Plan.
• 2. The housing stock in the county would increase
  through subdivision rather than lot-splitting.
• 3. The TR-36 district is a logical transition
  from the GB to the west and TR-18 to the north to
  the RU-4 to the east.
• 4. As a part of the Countys subdivision process
  and as required by ADOT, the developers of the
  subject parcels must collaborate with other
  developers in providing access improvements that
  result in safe ingress off of and egress onto
  Highway 90.
• 5. The proposed subdivisions would be served by a
  water company (rather than individual wells),
  would be subject to water conservation CCRs, and
  would be required to consume no more water than
  if the zoning remained RU-4..

10
Factors Favoring Denial

• 1. Road improvements to accommodate the
  additional traffic generated by the proposed
  subdivisions would be necessary.
• 2. Overall density would increase four times over
  that which would occur under existing zoning.

11
Planning Zoning Commission Recommendation

• On June 14, 2006, the Planning Zoning
  Commission voted 4-2 (Guy and Walters opposed) in
  favor of forwarding a recommendation of approval
  of these rezoning requests with the
  aforementioned conditions to the Board of
  Supervisors.

12
Staff Recommendation

• The Planning Department recommends approval of
  these rezoning requests, subject to the following
  conditions
• 1. A subdivision review process will be required,
  all development shall be in substantial
  conformance with the rezoning application, and
  the maximum number of dwelling units will be 44
  (36 Nye, 8 Neal).
• 2. Prior to any subdivision plat approval, the
  applicants shall commit to a development
  agreement or other acceptable mechanism
  specifying the funding, timing, and
  responsibility for improvements stipulated in the
  TIA.
• 3. Prior to any subdivision plat approval, the
  applicants shall participate in a comprehensive
  hydrology report to address the areas drainage
  and floodplain issues.

13
Staff Recommendation
4. Prior to any subdivision plat approval, the
applicants shall adequately demonstrate in a
revised water budget that, through additional
conservation measures such as storm water capture
and recharge, projected water consumption will
not exceed 10 acre-feet per year. A reduction in
the number of dwelling units may be necessary to
achieve this goal. 5. All future subdivisions
shall include specific disclosure language in the
general notes and CCRs regarding military
activities in the area as drafted and approved by
Fort Huachuca.