Research Seminars in IT in Education MIT6003 Research Methodology I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Seminars in IT in Education MIT6003 Research Methodology I

Description:

How to collect the necessary data to answer the research question. Typical ... Ex post facto hypothesizing. Illogical reasoning. Ego involvement in ... Ex post facto ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: wind471
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Seminars in IT in Education MIT6003 Research Methodology I


1
Research Seminars inIT in Education(MIT6003)Re
search Methodology I
  • Dr Jacky Pow

2
Agenda
  • Method evaluation critical review of research
    procedures

3
Typical research procedures
  • Formulation of the research problem
  • An emerging issue
  • Review of the literature
  • What has been done and what need to be done
  • Data collection
  • How to collect the necessary data to answer the
    research question

4
Typical research procedures
  • Data analysis
  • How to analyze the and organize the data
  • Discussion
  • To discuss the implication of the data and see
    whether the research questions can be answered
  • Future research agenda
  • Conclusion
  • What this research has achieved

5
Class activity
  • What questions would you ask if you were to
    evaluate the appropriateness of the research
    method in a study?
  • How will you answer the questions you identified?

6
Issues in educational research
  • Reliability (Trochim, 2002)
  • In research context, the term reliability means
    repeatability or consistency. A measure (of the
    variables) is considered reliable if it would
    give us the same result over and over again
    (assuming that what we are measuring is not
    changing!)

7
Types of reliability
  • Inter-Rater/Inter-observer Reliability
  • Used to assess the degree to which different
    raters/observers give consistent estimates of the
    same phenomenon
  • Test-Retest reliability
  • Used to assess the consistency of a measure from
    one time to another
  • Administer the same test to the same (or a
    similar) sample on two different occasions

8
Types of reliability
  • Parallel-Forms Reliability
  • Used to assess the consistency of the results of
    two-tests constructed in the same way from the
    same content domain
  • Administer both instruments to the same sample
  • Internal Consistency reliability
  • Used to assess the consistency of results across
    items within a test
  • Calculate the average correlation of the items
    splitting into half e.g., Cronbachs alpha (a)

9
Cronbachs alpha (a)
Step 1
Trochim, 2002
10
Cronbachs alpha (a)
Step 2
Trochim, 2002
11
Issues in educational research
  • Validity
  • Refers to what we measure is what we intend to
    measure (highly related to the research question)
  • We have to make sure that the tools we use to
    measure the variables are valid
  • Internal validity
  • The degree to which correct conclusions about
    causal relations can be drawn

12
Reliability and validity
Trochim, 2002
13
Class activity
  • Discuss with your group members to see whether
    the issues facing by quantitative and qualitative
    research are the same in terms of reliability and
    validity

14
Issues in educational research
  • Applicability
  • To be of any use educational research must
    generalize from the sample to the population
  • The findings of the research should be able to
    inform teaching practice or policy formulation

15
Issues in educational research
  • Feasibility
  • There may be some excellent ideas in educational
    research but due to some reasons, the research
    may not be feasible
  • These reasons may include resource, time or
    ethical considerations

16
Issues in educational research
  • Significance
  • Educational research should have impact or
    acceptable level of importance to the field
  • Significance the value of the research

17
Issues in educational research
  • Ethics
  • The research we conduct should not violate the
    ethical standard
  • For instance, it is not ethical to segregate a
    group of students during their programme in order
    to test out a new teaching technique

18
Common errors made in research
  • Selective observation
  • Inaccurate observation
  • Overgeneralization
  • Made-up information
  • Ex post facto hypothesizing
  • Illogical reasoning
  • Ego involvement in understanding
  • Premature closure of inquiry

19
Selective observation
  • It happens when attention is drawn to
    observations or answers that confirm pre-existing
    beliefs
  • A few ways you can try to avoid selective
    observation in your research
  • Literature review
  • Decide your research approach beforehand
  • Take thorough notes
  • Watch for "disconfirmatory" information
  • Consider both "sides" of your study

20
Inaccurate observation
  • It occurs when we misremember or misrecord
    data
  • To increase your accuracy you have to plan your
    observation
  • Using forms
  • Doing time/area sampling
  • Writing down as much information as you can
  • To practice observing and recording your
    observations before actually doing it for real

21
Overgeneralization
  • Overgeneralization is generalizing to others who
    are different from one's research population
  • To avoid overgeneralizing
  • Replicate one's study
  • Support many tests of the same theory
  • Attempt to use representative samples
  • Recognize the limitations of one's research

22
Made-up information
  • It happens when one fills in details without a
    scientific basis for doing so
  • Instead of making up information, you could do a
    variety of things
  • Ask someone who knows what's going on for their
    opinion
  • Do a thorough literature review to help you
    understand possible outcomes and unique customs
  • Rely on prior research studies and/or theory to
    guide your own interpretation of what was going on

23
Ex post facto hypothesizing
  • It occurs when a researcher decides what happened
    after it happened and after the study was done
  • In scientific research, we have to decide what
    will happen before we do our study, not after

24
Illogical reasoning
  • Illogical reasoning is just that illogical
  • to avoid illogical reasoning in your own
    research
  • Base your decisions on prior research and theory
  • Make extensive use of peer review

25
Ego involvement in understanding
  • It happens when people let the human side of them
    dictate their findings and how they view findings
    by other researchers
  • To avoid ego involvement
  • To try to remain neutral
  • To stay away from topics about which you can't be
    neutral
  • To use the team approach

26
Premature closure of inquiry
  • It occurs when we decide that we know enough
    about a topic and decide that it no longer
    warrants future study
  • To deal with premature closure
  • To keep looking for answers, even if it involves
    using different approaches
  • To find non-controversial ways to do it as far as
    possible

27
Mystification
  • It happens when we attribute results to the
    supernatural
  • To avoid mystification
  • Keep looking for answers when you feel tempted to
    rely on enchanted explanations
  • Peer review will prevent you from embarrassing
    yourself

28
End of lesson 9
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com