Diapositivo 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositivo 1

Description:

'Our professors may be elite researchers but can they communicate ... Dr. Marie-Anne Persoons (General Coordination, Benelux Bologna Secretariat): 'Bologna 2020. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: clsi6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositivo 1


1
Theme 1 Lifelong Learning for Professors Report
from Working Group 1 Chair Giuliano Augusti
ENAEE Raporteurs Cristina Silva ISEKI_Food
3 / ISEKI_Mundus2 Jesus Frias
ISEKI_Food 3 / ISEKI_Mundus2
2
Our professors may be elite researchers but can
they communicate with students and motivate our
future scientists engineers? Invited
Keynote Speakers Prof. Paul Yates (Keele
University) Teaching Academic Staff to Teach
The Roles of Institutions and Disciplines Dr.
Anette Kolmos (SEFI, Aalborg University, UNESCO
Chair PBL) Pedagogical Training for Academic
Staff a Scandinavian Perspective Prof. Dr.
Ralph Dreher (IGIP, Bergische Univerisität
Wuppertal) The ING-PAED-Curriculum of IGIP
Idea, Structure and Usability
3
  • CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS (1)
  • A good researcher is not necessarily
    A good teacher
  • It is possible to train teachers but does
    not imply to produce good teachers
  • It is required
  • - Institutional mission and global
    strategy
  • - management structure
  • - financial support
  • - personal development plans
    (motivation, believe, no-alternative)
  • - incentives should be at the same level
    as for research activities
  • - to be positive

4
  • CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS (2)
  • Students assessment of teaching important
    but have to be analyzed in context
  • Change of actitude is extremely important
  • Teachers have to reflect on their teaching
    ? Learning Outcomes contribution
  • Entrance and progress on the academic career
    has to require pedagogical
  • training and experience ? Quality of HE
  • Accreditation is a powerful tool How do
    you monitor and assure good and
  • up-to-date transfer of knowledge?
  • Academic Networks should invest on
    disseminating good practices
  • Develop training with research basis

5
Theme 2 Scientific/Technological Higher
Education Frameworks Report from Working Group
1 Chair Giuliano Augusti
ENAEE Raporteurs Cristina Silva ISEKI_Food 3
/ ISEKI_Mundus2 Jesus Frias
ISEKI_Food 3 / ISEKI_Mundus2
6
The structure of science and engineering
education is crucial for the mobility of
professionals. This topic links with the agenda
of the 2009 conference of European education
ministers in Leuven, 28-29 April 2009
Invited Keynote Speakers Dr. Marie-Anne
Persoons (General Coordination, Benelux Bologna
Secretariat) "Bologna 2020. Main outcomes of
the Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve 2009 Ministerial
conference". Prof. Sebastiao Feyo Azevedo
(University of Porto/ENAEE) Meta Frameworks
and Sectoral Frameworks in Engineering Education
7
  • How can Techno TN09 contribute to the development
    of Qualification Frameworks?
  • Academic Networks have the expertise
  • - create databases of information
  • - share and disseminate good practices
  • - develop projects at international
    level (involving all stakeholders)
  • - show the differences among the
    countries
  • - contribute to change the methods of
    teaching
  • Compile and share different methods to
    develop high level skills and soft skills
  • Contribute to develop assessing methods for
    soft skills (e.g. portfolio)

8
Theme 3 New Skills for New Jobs Report from
Working Group 1 Chair Giuliano Augusti
ENAEE Raporteurs Cristina Silva ISEKI_Food 3
/ ISEKI_Mundus2 Jesus Frias
ISEKI_Food 3 / ISEKI_Mundus2
9
Invited Keynote Speaker Mrs. Julie Fionda (EC,
DG Education Training) Round table
Panellists Mrs. Julie Fionda (EC, DG Education
Training, BE) Mr. Xavier Fouger (Dassault
Systems, FR) Prof.Dr. Hartmut Schmidt (University
of Applied Sciences Darmstad/Braun, D) Mr Charles
Watkinson (Corrosioneering Group, UK)
10
  • CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS (1)
  • Industry has no time or budget to educate
    first employers
  • What is important is ABILITY
  • Internship at industry at each year
    mandatory
  • Background has to continue compulsory
  • Large investment in soft skills may limit
    progress in the future
  • Students mimicking the professor ? Social
    training for professors
  • Students have to self learn (teach learn to
    learn not teaching)
  • Provide more contacts between students and
    industry
  • Engage industry in curricula development ?
    disadvantage - short term view

11
  • CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS (2)
  • Capacity of adapting ? soft skills included
    in the curricula
  • Communication skills ? tuned to the audience
  • Logical decision ? experience, the logic of
    nature -- teach in laboratories
  • Work in Virtual Environments
  • There is a need to identify the most
    important skills to develop at HE
  • Communication with secondary education
  • Massification of education ? difficult to
    produce a uniform product

12
Participants Gunter Heitman ENAEE TU
Berlin Anette Kolmos SEFI Aalborg Univ Urbaan
Titulaer STEPS TWO Kepler Univ. Evangelos
Vitoratos STEPS TWO U. Patras Greece Sebastião
Feyo de Azevedo ENAEE U. Porto Antonio
Comparetti ERABEE Univ. of Palermo Iring
Wasser ENAEE ASIIN cV Stylianos
Paparis ESTIa NTUA Jesus Frias ISEKI_Food
3 Dublin Inst. of Techn. Olivier
Bonnaud ELLEIEC 1N Univ. of Rennes 1 Erbil
Payzin ENAEE Mudek Cône Françoise SEFI SEFI
Xavier Fouger Dassault Systems Cristina
Silva ISEKI_Food 3 Univ. Catholic
Portugal Giuliano Augusti ENAEE Augusto
Laloux SEFI
Thank You.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com