Least Restrictive Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Least Restrictive Environment

Description:

Legal doctrine that even if legislative purpose of government action is ... State is forbidden from using a bazooka to kill a fly on a citizen's back if a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: sbr58
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Least Restrictive Environment


1
Least Restrictive Environment
  • Sherrie Brown
  • Special Education and the Law
  • Winter Quarter 2009

2
Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)
  • Constitutional basis for LRE
  • Statutory and regulatory requirements
  • Judicial interpretations
  • Policy reasons behind rebuttable presumption
    concept

3
Constitutional Legislative Basis for LRE
  • Legal doctrine that even if legislative purpose
    of government action is legitimatee.g.,
    promoting public health and safetypurpose may
    not be accomplished by means that broadly limit
    personal liberties if can be accomplished in less
    oppressive or restrictive manner.
  • State is forbidden from using a bazooka to kill a
    fly on a citizens back if a fly swatter would
    accomplish the task.
  • Historical treatment of disabled individuals in
    this country?

4
IDEA mandates LRE
  • Unlike FAPE and related services, LRE is not
    defined anywhere in the statute.
  • Supremes have not ruled on LRE and the lower
    courts differ on what standard to apply.
  • IDEA regulations include guidelines.
  • However, how are mainstreaming, inclusion, LRE
    differentor are they?

5
How do you define these terms?
  • Mainstreaming not in the IDEA but has come to
    mean placement in a regular education setting.
    In some or all of school activities.
  • Inclusion or integrated education child in the
    regular classroom with adaptive curriculum.
  • Both are examples of the LEAST RESTRICTIVE
    ENVIRONMENT CONTINUUM.
  • From Colker and Milani (2006) Everyday Law for
    Individuals with Disabilities.

6
LRE Statutory Guidance
  • Children with disabilities to be educated in the
    same setting (regular educational environment) as
    their non-disabled peers to the maximum extent
    appropriate.
  • Removal should only occur when nature or severity
    is such that education in regular classes with
    use of supplementary aids and services cannot be
    achieved satisfactorily. 20 USC 1412
  • Therefore, it is not an absolute requirement that
    all children be served in neighborhood and/or
    regular setting/classroom.

7
Federal Regulations
  • To the maximum extent appropriate, children
    with disabilities, including children in public
    or private institutions or other care facilities,
    are educated with children who are non-disabled,
    and
  • That special classes, separate schooling, or
    other removal of children with disabilities from
    the regular educational environment occurs only
    if the nature or severity of the disability of a
    child is such that education in regular classes
    with the use of supplementary aids and services
    cannot be achieved satisfactorily. 34 C.F.R.
    300.114
  • Continuum of Alternative Placements must be
    available. 34 C.F.R. 300.115

8
Placement
  • (a) The Placement Decision
  • (1) Is made by a group of persons, including the
    parents, and other persons knowledgeable about
    the child, the meaning of the evaluation data,
    and the placement options and
  • (2) Is made in conformity with the LRE
    provisions of the regulations
  • (b) The childs placement
  • (1) Is determined at least annually
  • (2) Is based on the childs IEP and
  • (3) Is as close as possible to the childs
    home
  • (c) Unless the IEP of a child with a disability
    requires some other arrangement, the child is
    educated in the school that he or she would
    attend if nondisabled
  • (d) In selecting the LRE, consideration is given
    to any potential harmful effect on the child or
    on the quality of services that he or she needs
    and
  • (e) A child with a disability is not removed from
    education in age-appropriate regular classrooms
    solely because of needed modifications in the
    general education curriculum. 34 CFR 300.516

9
Washington State Regulations
  • Mirror the federal regulations on LRE.
  • See handout of WAC 392-172A-02050 through 02070.

10
So is it really so easy?
11
Final thoughts on the LRE regulations
  • Comments to IDEA Appendix A to Part C of 34
    CFR
  • See handout
  • Courts likely to support regular education
    classroom placement UNLESS
  • Child harmed medically, emotionally or
    psychologically by the regular placement.
  • Courts willing to remove a child from regular
    education when severely disruptive or
    dangerous--unless they are elementary children
    and then tough.

12
Judicial standard for LRE
  • Bd. Of Education of Sacramento City Unified SD v.
    Rachel Holland, 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994)
  • Four-part Test
  • Comparative educational benefits analysis
  • Nonacademic benefits to child of interacting with
    others
  • Possible negative effects of presence of child
    with disability on teacher and other children.
  • Cost of supplemental aids associated with the
    placement.

13
A.B., et al. v. Bremerton School District (2008)
  • Facts
  • Settlement terms
  • Placement of students residing in RHC (Francis
    Haddon Morgan Center) will not depend on their
    residency.
  • Placement of students will be determined on
    individual basis and will provide FAPE in the
    LRE.
  • Additional classroom space (portables) will be
    build at Bremerton High School to accommodate
    additional students.
  • However, the portables will not necessarily be
    the classroom for the students from FHMC and if
    they are placed there, the portables will have
    restroom, sink etc.

14
So is it so easy?
  • FAPE vs. LRE
  • What role does cost play?
  • How many supplementary aids/services are
    required?
  • Burden of proof?
  • Rebuttable presumption concept
  • What would you establish as standards?
  • Trial Placementsdiscuss with the Vashon Case

15
Temporary Restrictive Placement?
  • Ms. S. v. Vashon Island SD, 337 F.3d 1115 (9th
    Cir. 2003)
  • School district is not required to attempt a
    regular education placement prior to placement in
    a more restrictive setting WHEN It relies on
    relevant reports and records from previous school
    enrollment.
  • Students academic performance well below peers
    and she had been home-schooled for past year.
  • She would have benefited from socialization with
    non-disabled peers, but her need for
    individualized curriculum and history of some
    behavioral problems weighed in favor of more
    restrictive placement at least temporarily.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com