FutureDAQ

1
FutureDAQ
Administrative Aspects

• Walter F.J. Müller, GSI
• 2nd FutureDAQ workshop, September 9, 2004

2
Agenda

• Report from the I3HP Meeting at LNF on June 26th
  (L. Schmitt)
• Activity Spokesperson and Deputy
• Working Group Structure
• How to put live into existing ones ? Need
  additional ones ?
• Update on work packages and Milestones
• Shift end-date from end 2006 to fall 2007 ?
  (L.Schmitt)
• Preparation of the first Status Report (due
  15.2.2005)
• Financial Issues
• -gt Questions to I3HP coordinator (R. Simon) ?
• -gt a.o.b. ?

3
Working Groups

• An activity summary
• mail forum
• members mails topic posts
• Selection Algorithms 6 0
  0 0
• Networking 10 0 1 8
• Signal Processing 3 0 1
  2
• Simulation 8 0 2 26
• Time Distribution 4 0 3
  11
• Tools 4 0 4 4

4
Preparation of First Status Report

• Contents (taken from Template)
• Progress Report
• Give a list of all contractors ....
• Describe the progress made during the reporting
  period toward the objectives of the JRA and
  toward the milestones and deliverables foreseen.
• Give a list of all milestones and deliverables
  defined in the contract that have been achieved
  during the reporting period.
• Describe any significant achievements, and their
  impact, resulting from this JRA during the
  reporting period.
• Clearly highlight and justify any major
  deviations from the planned activities defined in
  the last detailed implementation plan and in the
  contract. Indicate the recommended actions to
  correct such deviations.
• the list of deliverables
• a report on the use and dissemination of
  knowledge
• audit certificates, one for each contractor
• a detailed implementation plan for the next 18
  months.

5
Commercial Interests

• A significant number of individuals participating
  in FutureDAQ have affiliations with companies
  which are active in the 'instrumentation market'.
• All collaborators have been asked to disclose any
  form of affiliation with companies active in the
  'instrumentation market'.
• The following list summarizes the responses.

6
Existing Companies

• V. Lindenstruth, KIP
• Certon System
• markets cluster administration cards (CIA board)
• R. Männer, Uni Mannheim
• Silicon Software http//www.silicon-software.com
• markets machine vision products
• Acconovis GmbH http//www.acconovis.com
• markets bioinformatics tools
• B. Grube, I. Konorov, S. Paul, L. Schmitt (TUM)
• i-trOnics GmbH http//www.i-tronics.net
• markets signal processing and data acquisition
  products.
• T. Kiss
• CERNTECH http//www.cerntech.kfkipark.hu
• markets detector links (DLL, S-LINK)

some potential overlap with control aspects of
FutureDAQ
impact of FutureDAQ cannot be excluded
impact of FutureDAQ cannot be excluded
large overlap with FutureDAQ developments
possible interest and impact
7
Planned Companies

• U. Brüning, P. Haspel (Uni Mannheim)
• plan to market EXTOLL (follow up of ATOLL)

potential overlap with link/switch technology
developed for FutureDAQ
8
Commercial Interests Summary

• Observation 1 None of these companies is
  contractor of I3HP
• Observation 2 The IP is owned by the
  contractors, which are the 'home
  institutes' 9.4 Knowledge shall be the property
  of the Contractor generating it.
• Observation 3 Access to Knowledge for marketing
  purposes should be based on a contract

9.5.4. Access Rights for Use of Knowledge The
Contractors agree that the Access Rights to -
the Pre-Existing Know-How needed for use in
research activities or/and - to the own
Knowledge needed for use in research
activities shall be granted on a royalty-free
basis. In case of Access Rights to the
Pre-Existing Know-How or to the own Knowledge for
Use in the development, creation and marketing of
a product or process, or for creation and
provision of a service, Access Rights shall be
granted on fair and non discriminatory conditions
and the HPDB shall be informed of the content of
the contract.