The Budget Formulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

The Budget Formulation

Description:

The Budget Formulation & Execution Line of Business. USDA Representative: Paula Geiger ... Financial Management per the Constitution (1787) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: andys155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Budget Formulation


1
  • The Budget Formulation Execution Line of
    Business
  • USDA Representative Paula Geiger
  • PMO Lead Sandi McCabe
  • Managing Partner, U. S. Department of Education

June 6, 2007
2
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
Vision Modern, interoperable, flexible, cost
effective, and optimized solutions supporting all
phases of the formulation and execution of the
Federal Budget and linking budget formulation,
execution, planning, performance, and financial
information.
3

Budget Formulation Execution LoB
  • Relationship With
  • Financial Management and
  • the FM LoB

4
Budget Formulation, Budget Execution,
Financial Management per the Constitution (1787)
  • No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but
    in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law
  • (Budget Formulation and Execution)
  • and a regular Statement and Account of the
    Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money
    shall be published from time to time.
  • (Financial Management)
  • (Article I, Section 9)

5

Budget Formulation, Execution, and Financial
Management - A Complete Cycle
  • Policy Making Resource Allocation
  • ________________________________________
  • Post-decisional Accounting, Control, Reporting

Policy Making
Policy Making
Post-decisional
Post-decisional
6
Budget Formulation, Execution, and Financial
Management - Components
  • Policy Making ? Decisional
  • __________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________
    _____________________________________
  • __________________________________________________
    _____________________________
  • Post-decisional ? After-action
  • __________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________
    _____________________________________
  • Financial Management
  • Budget Execution
  • Apportionments
  • Allotments, Suballot., Allowances
  • Commitments
  • Obligations
  • Reprogramming
  • Budget Formulation
  • Agency Budget Requests
  • Presidents Budget Request
  • Legislative Action (Appropriations)
  • Accounting
  • Payments
  • Asset and Liability Mgmt
  • Funds Control
  • Collections Receivables
  • Reporting
  • Cost Accounting Performance Measurement

Key BFE LoB and FM LoB touch points
7
BFE LoB and FM LoB Coordination Activities
  • BFE LoB representatives are participating in
    regular meetings with the FM LoB including the
    CFO Councils FSIO Transformation Team meetings.
  • BFE LoB PMO disseminates information on
    FMLoB/FSIO exposure draft documents to the
    budgeting community and consolidates and submits
    comments (e.g. CGAC and Funds Control Exposure
    Draft comments).
  • Conducting a study and developing a Touch-Points
    document to highlight key intersections between
    Budgeting and Financial Management.
  • BFE LoB is partnering with Treasury Financial
    Management Service (FMS) on a Budget Execution
    solution swim lane.

8
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
  • Budget Formulation and Execution
  • The Nature of Federal Budgeting

9
Nature of Federal Budgeting
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but
in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law
(US Constitution Article I, Section 9)
  • Budgeting is the process by which limited Federal
    resources are allocated among competing demands.
  • It is a policy-driven process - inherently
    dynamic and fast-paced in response to political,
    economic, global, and (as witnessed last year)
    environmental events.
  • Key participants are the President, Congressional
    leaders, over two dozen House and Senate Budget
    Appropriations committees, OMB, CBO, and senior
    agency officials.
  • Each of these key participants has the power to
    demand information in their own formats in their
    own time frames.

10
Federal Budgeting is Dynamic
  • Illustrative examples (nostalgia for US
    Budgeteers)
  • August 1985 Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act established
    deficit targets and sequestration requirements.
  • Fall 1987 Bipartisan Budget Agreement following
    the Black Monday Stock Market crash.
  • Oct. 1990 Budget Enforcement Act - new rules for
    constructing baselines PAYGO for receipts
    entitlements.
  • Winter 1994 Republican Revolution and the
    government-wide shutdown. The current 2006
    Democratic Revolution.
  • Oct. 2001 decision to show Federal retirement
    costs on an accrual basis.
  • Major disasters such as 9/11 and Hurricane
    Katrina.
  • Presidential Transitions (every one is unique).

11
Budget Formulation and Execution LoBAs Is State
- Impetus for Change
  • Most agencies do not have integrated automated
    systems to support their budgeting activities
    they depend on basic desktop office software to
    prepare and justify multi-billion dollar budgets.
  • Hundreds of budget exercises are conducted
    annually without the benefit of electronic
    collaborative technologies.
  • Agency budget personnel spend too much time
    entering and reconciling data and merging numbers
    into their submissions, and publications.
  • Only one agency currently submits data to MAX
    electronically.
  • Agencies pursuing automated systems have done so
    unilaterally with little coordination (until the
    BFE LoB).
  • Agency Analysis - Findings
  • Primary agency tools for budgeting are Excel and
    Word
  • A few agencies have integrated Excel Word with
    databases
  • A few agencies have successfully implemented
    elements of budget systems that contribute
    significantly to their productivity
  • There have also been quite a few unsuccessful
    attempts at implementing systems some fairly
    expensive
  • BFE modules from FM vendors have not worked

12
Business Analysis Findings
  • Nine major business processes were identified as
    common to all agencies.
  • Within these nine major processes, 59 business
    activities were identified with a high degree of
    commonality.
  • However, at the next level of business
    specificity, there were significant process and
    workflow variances - reflecting inherent agency
    diversity characteristics.
  • Also, the dynamic nature of budgeting
    necessitates that systems be flexible enough to
    readily accommodate changes to business processes.
  • Nine Business Processes
  • Pre-budget formulation
  • Strategic business assessments
  • Dept / agency budgeting
  • Dept / agency submission to OMB
  • OMB internal decision making
  • Preparation and publication of the Presidents
    Budget and Mid-Session Review
  • Congressional submission and negotiation
  • Tracking congressional action
  • Budget execution
  • Agency Diversity Characteristics
  • Budget size
  • Political sensitivity
  • Mission complexity
  • Funding type (mandatory vs. discretionary,
    credit, revolving)
  • Activity type (operational, services, regulatory,
    capital investment, grant-making,
    commercial-like, military)
  • Organizational complexity (centralized,
    federated, field, international)
  • Budgeting sequence (top-down vs. bottom-up)
  • Different (and multiple) Congressional
    constituencies

13
LoB Common Solutions Framework
  • Focus on Functional Capabilities
  • The diversity and dynamic nature of budgeting
    business processes precludes traditional business
    process engineering approaches.
  • However, these difficulties can be effectively
    bridged by focusing on solutions that enhance
    core functional capabilities of budgeting.
  • These same core functional capabilities often
    apply to multiple business activities.
  • Therefore, an architecture based on core
    functional capabilities will have broad
    applicability in transforming budgeting
    activities.
  • Core Functional Capabilities
  • Numbers manipulation (spreadsheets, reporting)
  • Word processing and document publishing
  • Database/data warehouse
  • Tracking
  • Collaboration (meetings, documents)
  • Data collection (numbers text)
  • Information sharing
  • Analysis and modeling

14
LoB Target Architecture
  • Solutions consist of Functional Capabilities that
    support multiple business processes.
  • Applications are flexible integrations of modules
    that connect via open data exchange technologies
    and can be reused.
  • Functional Capabilities Modules in turn consist
    of service components consistent with a Services
    Oriented Architecture.
  • Federated application solutions are a
    combination of central, shared, agency-unique,
    Open, GOTS, and COTS components.
  • Capabilities Solutions that enhance the
    effectiveness of performing budgeting functions
  • Technology
  • Agency Budgeting Tools
  • Analytical Tools
  • Budget Performance Integration
  • Collaboration
  • Data Collection Tracking
  • Document Production
  • Knowledge Management
  • Human Capital
  • Governance
  • Program Mgmt Office
  • Architecture
  • Standards

15
The LoB Approach
  • Improve Federal budgeting without compromising
    the ability of agencies and OMB to perform
    essential budgeting functions.
  • Based on a value proposition - agencies
    voluntarily participate in the LoB and pay a flat
    funding (or in-kind) contribution to gain the
    benefits and government-wide services the LoB
    provides.
  • Agencies optionally implement LoB sponsored tools
    and services that they either procure and deploy
    themselves or obtain via fee-for-service.
  • Governed by the contributing agencies under the
    auspices of the Budget Officers Advisory Council
    (BOAC) and the Small Agency Council.

16
LoB Transformation Strategies
  • Governance processes that
  • Maintain a year-round PMO staff to advance
    budgeting interests
  • Set standards for data, data exchange, and
    modularization
  • Extend the architecture to further understand
    business processes
  • Provide centralized services (and service
    components) where functions are mandated or
    conducive to standardization.
  • Help agencies be Smart Consumers
  • Share information on what has and hasnt worked
    (best and worst practices)
  • Consolidate acquisitions (e.g. Smart Buys)
  • Arrange for shared service providers (for
    functions multiple agencies are acquiring)
  • Leverage new custom development in a reusable way
    as GOTS and Open Source.
  • Encourage Collaboration - establish a community
    of practice for the budgeting profession.

17
LoB Benefits
  • Cost avoidance more efficient acquisition of
    agency budgeting systems reuse of custom
    development as GOTS consolidated purchases.
  • Improved effectiveness faster turnaround more
    collaboration reduction of labor intensive
    activities freeing up and leveraging valuable
    analyst resources better workforce professional
    development.
  • Reduced risk avoiding solutions that havent
    worked fewer errors in agency publications.
  • Enhanced budget decision making, execution,
    planning, performance, and financial integration.
  • Supports the Presidents Management Agenda

18
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
  • Capabilities as
  • Common Solutions

19
Capabilities as Common Solutions
Agency Budgeting Tools
(New) Budget Execution (including Touch-Points
with the FM LoB)
Analytical Tools
Budget Formulation Execution Line of Business
(BFE LoB)
Budget Performance Integration
Budget Formulation Execution Line of Business
(BFE LoB)
Collaboration
Data Collection Tracking
Document Production
Knowledge Management
Human Capital (the Federal Budgeting Profession)
Program Management (Coordination, Standards,
Architecture)
20
Agency Budgeting Tools
21
Budget Execution (New)
22
Collaboration
23
Data Collection Tracking
24
Human Capital (the Federal Budgeting Profession)
25
Governance(Coordination, Standards,
Architecture)
26
Current Progress - Highlights
  • Established the PMO within the LoBs managing
    partner, the Dept. of Education (e-mail
    BudgetLoB_at_ed.gov).
  • Established a government-only collaboration
    website for the budget community. Used to
    coordinate agency comments on FM LoB exposure
    drafts, and for collaboration by the Earmarks
    Workgroup.
  • Piloted a quick-turnaround data collection
    approach that collected the earmarks database in
    just six weeks.
  • Productized our first agency system for use by
    other agencies Treasurys Budget Formulation
    Execution Manager (BFEM) available via shared
    service provider or as GOTS software.
  • Well along with the development of a budget
    systems decision matrix that compiles
    requirements from multiple agencies and assesses
    available budget system solutions against them.
  • Started a new Budget Execution Solutions
    workgroup in partnership with Treasury FMS, and
    including the new MAX Apportionment application
    and a study of key intersections (touch-points)
    with Financial Management.

27

Budget Formulation Execution LoB
  • Summary

28
Vision The Budget of the Future
  • The MAX A-11 data collection application as we
    know it would disappear - it would be replaced by
    agencies using their own automated systems to
    formulate their budgets and pass the data to OMB
    electronically.
  • Budget numbers and supporting text would move
    seamlessly from stage to stage of the budget
    process.
  • Budget exercises even fast-turnaround ad hoc
    exercises would be performed using nation-wide
    web-based applications.
  • Collaboration within agencies, between agencies
    and OMB, with the Hill would be facilitated by
    easy-to-use secure capabilities.

29

Engaging agency CFOs on the BFE LoB
  • Opportunities BFE LoB presents for each agency
  • Touch-Points Study
  • Communicating the BFE LoB to Departmental
    Components
  • Be a good consumer of budget formulation
    execution tools
  • Use the new BFE decision matrix and participate
    in the workgroup. Look at the Treasury BFEM
    tool.
  • Reconsider any procurements of BFE modules that
    are part of FM systems they have generally not
    worked.
  • If you have a system, form a consortium for
    development, modernization, and enhancement.
    Consider making it available for other agencies
    as an LoB productized system.

30
  • Supporting Materials

31
  • Budget Formulation and Execution LoB
  • Vision, Goals, Objectives

32
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
Vision Modern, interoperable, flexible, cost
effective, and optimized solutions supporting all
phases of the formulation and execution of the
Federal Budget and linking budget formulation,
execution, planning, performance, and financial
information.
33
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
  • Goals
  • Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
    agency and central processes for formulating and
    executing the Federal Budget
  • Improve the integration and standardized exchange
    of budget formulation, execution, planning,
    performance measurement, and financial management
    information and activities across government
  • Improve capabilities for analyzing budget,
    execution, planning, performance, and financial
    information in support of decision making
  • Enhance capabilities for aligning programs and
    their outputs and outcomes with budget levels and
    actual costs to institutionalize budget and
    performance Integration
  • Enhance the effectiveness of the Federal
    budgeting workforce

34
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
Goal 1 - Improve the efficiency and effectiveness
of agency central processes for formulating and
executing the Federal Budget
  • Objectives
  • The tactical targets that lead to achieving the
    goals
  • Develop a target architecture, concept of
    operations, and range of common solutions that
    are flexible enough to accommodate the diverse
    and dynamic requirements of agency and central
    budget processes
  • Achieve operational efficiencies and cost savings
    via the consolidation and dissemination of
    standardized budgeting solutions and processes
    where possible
  • Develop a maturity model that assesses the
    sophistication of each individual agencys
    automated budgeting processes and defines
    transition paths to appropriate common solutions
    for agencies at different maturity levels
  • Establish a government-wide capability for
    electronic collaboration on budgeting-related
    exercises and activities by organizations in the
    Federal budgeting community

35
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
Goal 2 - Improve the integration and standardized
exchange of budget formulation, execution,
planning, performance measurement, and financial
management information and activities across
government
  • Objectives
  • The tactical targets that lead to achieving the
    goals
  • Ensure that the LoB target architecture, concept
    of operations, and range of common solutions
    facilitates automated exchange of data using
    standards and technologies for electronic
    information exchange
  • Improve the collaboration between budgeting,
    planning, and financial management organizations
  • Review and reconcile terms and usage between
    budgeting and financial management information

36
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
Goal 3 - Improve capabilities for analyzing
budget, execution, planning, performance, and
financial information in support of decision
making
  • Objectives
  • The tactical targets that lead to achieving the
    goals
  • Ensure that the LoB target architecture, concept
    of operations, and range of common solutions
    includes diverse innovative tools and approaches
    for enhancing agency and central budget abilities
    to readily and flexibly extract, manipulate, and
    model budget, execution, performance, and
    financial data
  • Ensure that the clearinghouse/repository for
    Federal budgeting and execution activities
    facilitates and promotes agencies adopting best
    practices and common solutions for analyzing data
    and supporting decision making

37
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
Goal 4 - Enhance capabilities for aligning
programs and their outputs and outcomes with
budget levels and actual costs to
Institutionalize budget and performance
integration
  • Objectives
  • The tactical targets that lead to achieving the
    goals
  • Establish guidance and best practices relating to
    the alignment of program budget requirements,
    strategic goals, actual costs, and performance
    outcomes
  • Ensure that the LoB target architecture, concept
    of operations, and range of common solutions
    includes innovative approaches that facilitate
    integration of planning and performance in all
    phases of the budget formulation and execution
    process
  • Establish the standardized processes and data
    definitions necessary to readily align budget,
    planning, and performance information

38
Budget Formulation Execution LoB
Goal 5 - Enhance the effectiveness of the Federal
budgeting workforce
  • Objectives
  • The tactical targets that lead to achieving the
    goals
  • Create a Federal Budgeting Community of Practice
  • Establish a government-wide capability for
    knowledge sharing among agencies and central
    budget organizations, including a
    clearinghouse/repository for Federal budgeting
    activities of interest (e.g., guidance, best
    practices, lessons learned, etc)
  • Develop and disseminate best practices for human
    capital management for Federal Budget offices
  • Conduct a skills assessment and gap analysis for
    Federal budgeting develop and disseminate best
    practices for training and education
  • Conduct conferences, training, and other
    approaches that facilitate professional
    development of the Federal budgeting workforce.

39
Capabilities as Common Solutions
40
Capabilities as Common Solutions (cont.)
41
Capabilities as Common Solutions (cont.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com