Technical Committee 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Technical Committee 3

Description:

Technical Committee 3. INFORMATION STRUCTURES, DOCUMENTATION AND GRAPHICAL SYMBOLS ... introduces a new structure 'conjoint designation' for distinguishing among ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: EirikS1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technical Committee 3


1
Technical Committee 3 INFORMATION STRUCTURES,
DOCUMENTATION AND GRAPHICAL SYMBOLS
2
TC3 WorkshopStructuring principles and reference
designationsCape Town 2005-10-193(Cape
Town/MT18)5
  • Eirik Selvik
  • Convenor TC3/MT18

3
The revision process of IEC 61346-1
  • A DC issued in April 2005
  • A MCR issued in July 2005 with call for
    membership in MT 18
  • A time-schedule indicating the next edition of
    IEC 61346-1 in end 2007
  • MT 18 intend to have its first meeting in Dec.
    2005
  • ISO/TC10 has indicated interest in cooperation

4
Questionnaire results
  • The DC document (3/763/DC) raised 12 questions to
    be answered by the NCs.
  • The MCR (3/773/MCR) provides a summary of the
    answers provided

5
Q1 Is this overall structure and content
satisfactory today?
CHAPTER ONE
  • Generally found satisfactory.
  • Support for merging part 4 into part 1
  • JP propose splitting of part 2
  • Principles
  • Letter codes, being maintained in a database

6
Q2 Is the definition of the scope(s)
satisfactory today?
  • The scope is satisfactory and need not be changed

7
Q3 Are the applied principles for structuring
adequate?
  • The constituency principles are quite clear
  • The concept of the object and its aspects need
    more explanations
  • The description of the appliance of transitions
    and the consequences needs to be improved

8
Q4 Is the method for the construction of the
reference designations adequate?
  • Generally accepted
  • The transitions needs better explanations

9
Q5 Are there any vague, inappropriate or unclear
basic statements in clause 4 and 5?
  • No, but improved wording

10
Q6 Are the classification principles adequate?
  • Generally found satisfactory.
  • The classification used in IEC 61360 is proposed
    as an alternative.

11
Q7 Do the defined classes cover the present
needs?
  • The main classes do
  • There are requests for the introduction of
    sub-classes of IEC/PAS 62400.

12
Q8 Are there any vague, inappropriate or unclear
basic statements in Part 2?
  • A number of important clarifications are asked
    for.

13
Q9 Should the publication (part 4) be kept as a
separate part or should the content moved to Part
1?
  • Majority for moving it to part 1
  • Some will use it in part 3
  • alternatively keeping it as a separate part.

14
Q10 Should the description of the historical
development be maintained?
  • The historical description is considered to be of
    value, but possibly moved to part 1.

15
Q11 Should the life cycle story be maintained?
  • Yes

16
Q12 Should the detailed discussion of the
concepts (clauses 7 to 12) be maintained?
  • Yes

17
Conclusions of the MCR
  • The revision work needs to emphasize
  • Part 1
  • The understanding of the object concept
  • The impact of the use of transitions
  • Unambiguous versus unique reference designations
  • Unambiguous identify one object
  • Unique the only identifier of an object
  • How to handle part 4 in part 1
  • Part 2
  • Clarify the class/sub-class concept
  • Clarify task/purpose/function oriented classes
  • The possibility to apply a different
    classification scheme, especially that of IEC
    61360
  • Eventually inclusion of IEC/PAS 62400.

18
Further issues (1)
  • DE and ISO/TC10-DE introduces a new structure
    conjoint designation for distinguishing among
    different plants/factories on a common site,
    being common for the upper part of the three
    other structures
  • Is this a location-oriented structure on a
    high-level ?
  • The convenor has suggested in some of his earlier
    reports that the concept of the reference
    designation group should be withdrawn as it is an
    exception to the basic principles laid down in
    the publication.
  • Is this proposal generally supported

19
Further issues (2)
  • The following annexes are to be removed(already
    indicated in ed. 1)
  • Annex E - Letter codes of IEC 750
  • Annex F Differences and similarities between
    the designation system defined in this standard,
    IEC 750, ISO 3511 and ISO/DIS 1219-2
  • Are the following annexes really needed?
  • Annex B Examples of transitions from one aspect
    to another aspect
  • Annex C Example of transition from one aspect
    to another aspect where the latter aspect has
    independent representations

20
Function-oriented decomposition
Object
Implementable ?
Product
Object
Occurrence of subobject
Description of subobject
Subobject
Subobject
Subobject
21
Decomposition and composition
AP
AF
BF
BP
object with function aspect only object with
both function and product aspectobject with
product aspect only
Function-oriented decomposition
Product-oriented composition
22
Historical background
23
Basic requirements and properties
  • Annex A of IEC 61346-1 provides the basic
    requirement and the properties that the
    designation system of the publication shall
    fulfil.
  • Do the NCs agree with these requirements and
    properties today, or should some be removed,
    modified or others added?

24
Basic requirement a)
  • The reference designation system should be
    capable of being consistently applied in all
    phases (i.e. design, engineering, construction,
    erection, operation, maintenance, commissioning,
    decommissioning, etc.) of the life time of a
    technical product. The technical product can be a
    plant, a system, an assembly, a part, etc.
  • The reference designation system shall be able to
    accommodate different types of information and
    structures important to different phases of the
    life time.
  • The reference designation system should be
    flexible. It should be i) applicable in the
    different phases covering different needs. ii)
    possible to construct the reference designation
    from the available information.

25
Basic requirement b)
  • The reference designation system shall provide
    the ability to identify unambiguously any single
    object within an overall system.
  • The reference designation system shall allow a
    reference designation to be extended both at the
    end and at the front of the reference
    designation.

26
Basic requirements c), h) and i)
  • The reference designation system should be fully
    applicable to all technical areas.
  • The reference designation system should support
    the use of, and should be able to be implemented
    by, computer-aided tools for engineering,
    construction, operation, maintenance, etc.
  • A reference designation shall be applicable in
    combination with terminal designations, signal
    names and document classification codes.
  • The reference designation system shall contain
    rules for the creation of structures that enable
    the formulation of unambiguous reference
    designations. Rules for the interpretation shall
    also be provided.

27
Basic requirement d)
  • The reference designation system shall support
    the incorporation of subsystems and products from
    multiple organizations into systems from other
    organizations without change to the original
    sub-systems and their documentation.
  • The reference designation system shall not
    contain rules and restrictions that prohibit its
    use within a technical area.
  • The reference designation system shall cover all
    possible use of the system that can be foreseen
    within all technical areas and not be restricted
    to a particular field.

28
Basic requirement e)
  • The reference designation system shall support a
    representation of a system under different
    aspects, independently of the complexity of the
    system.
  • The reference designation system shall give the
    possibility to maintain a given reference
    designation within a system when this system is
    incorporated into a bigger system.

29
Basic requirements f) and g)
  • The reference designation system shall support
    the handling of computer programs and parts of
    such programs as technical products.
  • The reference designation system should be easy
    to apply and the reference designations should be
    easy for the user to understand.
  • The reference designation system shall be able to
    describe the fact that multiple independent
    functions are implemented within a single
    product.
  • The reference designation system shall be able to
    describe different aspects (views) of the system
    in order to represent the complex relationship
    among the different objects (i.e. functions,
    components, devices, etc.) of the system.

30
Basic requirement j)
  • A reference designation shall be applicable in
    combination with terminal designations, signal
    names and document classification codes.
  • The reference designation system shall not
    contain rules that prohibit its use in
    combination with terminal designations, signal
    names, and document classification codes. A
    reference designation shall be clearly
    distinguishable from a terminal designation,
    signal name and document classification code

31
Thank you for your attention.Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com