Social Psychology Greatest Hits - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Psychology Greatest Hits

Description:

E.g., clinging, resisting being put down, etc. The Roots of Attachment Research ... resistant/ambivalent: anxiety and uncertainly keep one person clinging to another ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: bgol
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Psychology Greatest Hits


1
Social Psychology Greatest Hits
2
Stereotype Threat Chapter 9(Steele
Aronson,1995)
  • The phenomena that individuals performance
    declines in response to their being aware of a
    negative stereotype that applies to them based on
    their group membership.
  • A self-confirming apprehension that one will be
    evaluated based on a negative stereotype.
  • Subtle, seemingly harmless activation of
    stereotypes may have profound consequence!!!!
  • The findings for performance deficits are
    pervasive
  • Race and verbal abilities (Whites gt Blacks)
    Steele Aronson (1995)
  • Gender and math abilities (Men gt Women) Spencer,
    Steele, Quinn (1999)
  • Race and athleticism for golf test Stone et al.,
    (1999)
  • (Whites gt Blacks when testing sports
    intelligence)
  • (Blacks gt Whites when testing natural athletic
    ability)

3
Stereotype Threat Example
4
Stereotype Threat
  • Disidentification Effects can also result
  • The correlation between self-esteem and school
    performance in African American students gets
    weaker as they transition from 8-10th grade
    (Osborne, 1997)
  • Students led to believe they benefited from
    gender or race based preferences in gaining
    admission to a college tended to underperform
    those who are led to feel competent (Brown et
    al., 2000)

5
Explanations for Stereotype Threat
  • Cognitive Distraction
  • Undermines working memory functioning
  • Physiological Arousal from heightened anxiety
  • undermine performance on difficult tests

6
Prosocial Behavior- Chapter 12 Bystander
Intervention Effect (Darley Latané, 1968)
  • The tragic story of Kitty Genovese.
  • Why did no one help?
  • Latané Darley Were social psychological
    processes at work that accounted for the
    nonintervention?
  • Bystander Effect (Darley Latane, 1968) The
    presence of others inhibits helping.

7
The Classic Diffusion of Responsibility Study
(Darley Latané, 1968)
  • Based on a Diffusion of Responsibility they
    hypothesized that as the number of bystanders in
    an emergency increases, the greater is the belief
    that Someone else will help, so I dont need to
  • A staged simulated emergency (a phony seizure)
    was created under different experimental
    conditions in which the number of perceived
    conversation partners was manipulated.
  • The cover story
  • The Studys Purpose- To examine students
    adjustment to university life and the personal
    problems they experience
  • The Studys Procedure-
  • A discussion would take place with other
    students.
  • To maximize honesty and to avoid their feeling
    embarrassed they would be placed in separate
    rooms and would alternate speaking by intercom,
    one at a time, for 2 minute intervals
  • Would willingness to quickly help during the
    seizure vary
  • depending on the group size of the conversation
    partners?

8
The Likelihood of Helping Quickly (During the
Duration of the Seizure) based on Group Size
9
The Percentage of Participants Who Had Helped (at
any time) During the Total 4-Minute Period based
on Group Size
10
The Length of Delay in Responding based on
Group Size
11
The Study Conclusions
  • The behavioral changes resulting from the group
    size demonstrate an example of social influence
  • In the presence of others a diffusion of
    responsibility had occurred as well as
    pluralistic ignorance.
  • To make sense of such phenomena, Latane Darley
    outlined a 5-step model of helping behavior.

12
The Five Steps to Helping in an Emergency
13
The Implicit Bystander Effect
Students imagined having dinner with either one
person, or a large group of friends, or they were
not asked to imagine a social situation, and were
then later asked if they would be willing to
volunteer their time to help in another study.
S.M.Garcia, K. Weaver, G.B. Moskowitz, and J.M.
Darley (2002) Crowded Minds The Implicit
Bystander Effect." Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 83, 843-853.
14
Time Pressure
  • Time pressure can conflict with ones good
    intentions of helping those in need.
  • Darley Batsons (1973) Good Samaritan study

15
Darley Batsons (1973) Results
16
Location and Culture
  • Do individuals have a worse chance of being
    helped in an emergency in a big city than in a
    small town?
  • Greater population density is associated with
    less helping.

17
Helping in the U.S.A.
From "Helpfulness Index How U.S. Cities Rank,"
The Boston Globe, July 7, 1994.
18
Helping Around the World
Based on R.V. Levine, A. Norenzayan and K.
Philbrick (2001). "Cross-Cultural Differences in
Helping Strangers," Journal of Cross-Cultural
Psychology, 32, 543-560.
19
Attachment- Chapter 11
  • Attachment an emotional tie or bond to a
    specific person or persons that endures across
    time and space
  • Building enduring emotional connections
  • Proximity-seeking behaviors
  • E.g., following a caregiver or climbing on to a
    caregivers lap, etc.
  • Contact-maintaining behaviors
  • E.g., clinging, resisting being put down, etc.

20
The Roots of Attachment Research
  • Harry Harlows experiments with infant monkeys
    showed that the critical ingredient in forming
    attachment is contact comfort
  • Results counter to psychoanalytic and behavioral
    theories that predict that infants form
    attachments to parental figure associated with
    food
  • Research by Ainsworth identified specific
    attachment styles

21
Mary Ainsworth The Strange Situation
22
Secure and Insecure Attachment
  • Securerelationship of trust and confidence that
    provides comfort, assurance, and secure base
  • Insecurerelationship that is unpredictable or
    unstable
  • avoidant one person tries to avoid any
    connection with another
  • resistant/ambivalent anxiety and uncertainly
    keep one person clinging to another

23
Measuring Attachment
  • Strange Situationlab procedure to measure
    attachment observed are
  • exploration of the toys (caregiver present)
  • reaction to caregivers departure
  • reaction to caregivers return
  • disorganized behaviorneither secure nor insecure
    attachmentmarked by inconsistent behavior of
    caregiver and infant toward each other

24

25
Measuring Attachment Internal Working Models of
Self Others
26
Attachment and Later Development
  • Secure attachment related to positive outcomes
    in
  • Preschool
  • Middle childhood
  • Continuity of caregiving may link infant
    attachment and later development.

27
Romantic Love Attachment
  • Hazen and Shaver (1987) draw a connection between
    attachment patterns early in life and the quality
    of romantic love relationships (see Figure).
  • Warm, responsive parenting fosters secure
    attachment patterns and is associated with
    longer-lasting relationships and the fewest
    divorces.

28
Figure 8.12
29
Romantic Love Attachment
  • Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991) developed a
    four-category model of adult attachment styles
    that result from the interaction of two factors
    (see figure 8.13)
  • Perceptions of own self worth (positive or
    negative).
  • Perceptions of others trustworthiness and
    reliability (positive or negative).

30
Measuring Attachment Internal Working Models of
Self Others
31
Figure 8.13
32
Romantic Love and Attachment
  • Conclusions
  • Securely attached individuals have healthier,
    more satisfying relationships.
  • People with a secure attachment style are more
    likely to have securely attached partners.
  • Early bonding experiences produce relatively
    enduring relationship styles.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com