Title: Erin M' Collins
1 Schedule M-3 Reporting Requirements American
Taxation Association
Erin M. Collins Tax Managing Director February
24, 2006
2Tax History Question
- What amendment gave the government power to tax
income? - Answer 16th Amendment was ratified in 1913
- How many versions have there been of the Internal
Revenue Code? What years? - Answer Code of 1939, Code of 1954, Code of 1986
3Mark Everson, IRS CommissionerJanuary 25, 2005
- In my view, five factors contributed to the
proliferation of abusive tax shelters. - First, the tremendous complexity of the tax code
- Second, the cozy relationship among sophisticated
promoters - Third, the erosion of professional ethics.
- The fourth reason was an ineffectual regulation
scheme, and - Fifth, the IRS largely withdrew from the
battlefield when it came to enforcement.
Government response, more transparency of
abusive tax transactions . . . and issuance of
new Schedule M-3. -
4Pam Olsen, Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy,
January 28, 2004
- The proposed Schedule M-3 will make
differences between financial accounting net
income and taxable income more transparent. We
see benefits to taxpayers and the IRS from the
new Schedule a reduction in unnecessary audits
and a swifter focus on those differences that are
more likely to arise when taxpayers take
aggressive positions or engage in aggressive
transactions. In addition, the increased
transparency will have a deterrent effect.
5Greg JennerActing Assistant Secretary for Tax
Policy
The purpose of this project has been to make
differences between financial accounting net
income and taxable income more transparent.
Schedule M-3 accomplishes this. Schedule M-3
provides information that will identify taxpayers
that may have engaged in aggressive transactions
and therefore should be audited. Large
book-tax differences frequently indicate the
existence of an abusive transaction. The new
Schedule M-3 will enable the IRS to identify
quickly those differences that warrant
additional scrutiny
6Deborah Nolan, IRS Large and Mid-Size Business
Division Commissioner, January 28, 2004
- These changes will enable us to focus our
compliance resources on returns and issues that
need to be examined and avoid those that do not.
Increasing the transparency of corporate tax
returns is critical to our objective to provide
certainty to taxpayers sooner and to improve
overall compliance.
7Donald Korb, IRS Chief Counsel January 24, 2006
-
- The Schedule M-3 will help us better
distinguish between high-risk and low-risk
returns, thereby improving our ability to focus
our examination resources where they are needed
most. Increasing transparency and disclosure of
tax issues are important elements in the Treasury
and IRS strategy to improve tax compliance.
8Robert Adams, a Senior Industry Advisor in the
IRS LMSB Division
- IRS recognizes the M-3 transition will not be
easy but the burden would lessen over time.
9Unidentified Client
-
- The M-3 is doable but very, very, very painful
and extremely time consuming. I cant imagine
that the person that designed this form has ever
had to prepare a complex tax return.
10Environment
- February 7, 1997
- Senators say its time to give the tax man an
audit - September 23, 1997 Senators Accuse IRS of
Heavy-Handed Tactics - September 24, 1997 IRS Nightmares Get Senate
Hearings - September 24, 1997 Taxpayer Details Wrongs at
Hands of IRS - September 25, 1997 IRS Employee Testify on
Abusive Practices - September 26, 1997 Congress Mulls Ways to Reform
IRS - October 10, 1997 Clinton Says IRS Abuses Wont
be Tolerated
11Environment (cont.)
- November 5, 1997 House Approves IRS Reform Bill
- December 13, 1997 Treasury Secretary Robert
Rubin Disturbed By IRS Violations - January 13, 1998 IRS Chief Counsel said on
Tuesday a new report has uncovered problems with
the tax-collecting agency's methods across the
country -
- January 28, 1998 IRS Chief Pledges Reform for
Agency to make it operate more like a business
that serves taxpayers instead of intimidating
them, the head of the severely criticized agency
told Congress Wednesday.
12Environment (cont.)
- RRA of 98
- Federal Tax Shelter Regulations
- Original temp. and prop. regs issued 2/28/2000.
- Revised temp. and prop. regs issued 8/21/2000.
- Another set of revised temp. and prop. regs
issued 8/7/2001. - More Revisions 6/14/2002 (temp. prop.).
- Still More Revisions 10/16/2002 (temp.
prop.). - Notice 2003-11 1/17/2003, delays effective date
of 10/2002 regs. - Final Regulations 2/28/2003
- Revised Final Regulations released 12/29/2003
- Final 6662 and 6664 Regulations released
12/29/2003
13Reportable Transactions
- Disclosure of the tax treatment of transaction is
limited in any manner and advisor receives a fee
of 250,000 (for C Corps) or 50,000.
(Confidential Transactions) - Transaction creates a Book-Tax Difference gt 10
million - Transaction gives rise to a 165 loss gt 10
million in one year or 20 million total - Fees for the transaction are refundable or
contingent if tax result is not achieved - Company holds an asset for 45 days or less and
claims a foreign tax credit gt 250,000 OR - Identified by the IRS as abusive either currently
or at any time before the statute of limitation
expires - Listed Transactions or those substantially
similar to Listed Transactions.
14IRS Stated Goals of Schedule M-3
- Transparency
- Allow IRS to Analyze Return Risk More Efficiently
- Identify returns containing highest compliance
risk - Avoid examining returns with little compliance
risk - Improve audit cycle time
- Periodically modify the form to highlight
emerging issues, identify trends, and adapt to
future changes encountered by large and midsize
corporations. - Facilitate tax return selection and issue
identification through electronic filing. - Facilitate the use of Limited Issue Focused
Examination (LIFE) audits through greater
transparency.
15M-3 Timetable - Key Dates
- January 24, 2004 First draft of Schedule M-3
- March 10, 2004 Draft of Instructions for
Schedule M-3 - July 7, 2004 Revised draft of Schedule M-3,
Rev. Proc. 2004-45. Treasury Releases
Frequently Asked Questions - August 6, 2004 Treasury Answers M-3 Questions
- October 25, 2004 Treasury releases final
draft version - December 2, 2004 IRS releases 16-pages of
instructions
16M-3 Timetable - Key Dates (cont)
- June 23, 2005 - IRS released revised draft M-3.
Added two new items, one line for the new
domestic production activities deduction and
another line for interest expense. - Dec. 20, 2005 - IRS released draft M-3 for
partnerships with 10M or more in adjusted total
assets, 35M or more in total receipts, or is 50
or more owned by an LMSB or other taxpayer
required to file a Schedule M-3 - effective for
tax years ending on or after 12-31-06
17M-3 Timetable - Key Dates (cont)
- Dec. 13, 2005 IRS released draft Schedule M-3 and
instructions for corporation that file Forms
1120PC, 1120L and 1120S. These M-3 will be used
by property and casualty insurance corporations,
life insurance corporations, and S corporation
that have total assets of 10M or more effective
for tax years ending on or after 12-31-06. - Jan 6, 2006 - IRS announced elimination of a
class of reportable transactions involving
significant book-tax differences. After a review
comparing reportable transaction submissions and
the information being provided on Schedule M-3,
the IRS and Treasury Department have concluded
that the book-tax difference category of
reportable transactions is not longer necessary.
Notice 2006-6.
18 19Schedule M - Tax years ending before December 31,
2004
- Schedule M consists of two components
- Schedule M-1, Reconciliation of Income (Loss) per
Books With Income per Return, and - Schedule M-2, Analysis of Unappropriated Retained
Earnings. - Schedule M is located on page 4 of Form 1120 and
is required to be completed by any corporation
with assets of 25,000 or greater.
20Schedule M - Tax years ending on or after
December 31, 2004
- Schedule M
- Schedule M-1 and Schedule M-2 OR
- Schedule M-2 and New Schedule M-3, Net Income
(Loss) Reconciliation for Corporations with Total
Assets of 10 Million or More. - New Schedule M-3 expands the current Schedule
- M-1, which has not been updated in several
decades.
21Schedule M Overview (Contd)
- Schedule M-1 reconciles a corporation's financial
accounting income or loss with the taxable income
or loss reported on the Form 1120. - These adjustments are often referred to as
Schedule M items or book/tax differences.
22Schedule M Overview (Contd)
- Schedule M-1 begins with net income (loss) per
books (after federal income tax), followed by the
adjustments necessary to reconcile book income to
the corporations taxable income (before any
deduction for dividends received and net
operating losses) - The schedule is then divided into four categories
of book/tax differences - Income subject to tax not recorded on books.
- Expenses recorded on books not deductible for
tax. - Income recorded on books not included in return.
- Deductions in return not charged against book
income.
23(No Transcript)
24What is a Schedule M-3?
- Like Schedule M-1, Schedule M-3 will provide the
IRS with information about book-tax differences - Schedule M-3 will provide MUCH greater detail
than Schedule M-1 because it requires a taxpayer
to - Separately state each transaction giving rise to
abook-tax difference (no materiality threshold,
i.e.,no dollar or percentage de minimis test),
and - Taxpayers will now be required to identify
whethereach difference is permanent or temporary
25Schedule M-3
- Very complex with extensive detail required
- Instructions are 16 pages
- Many new requirements for taxpayers
- Schedule M-1 10 line items
- Schedule M-3 92 line items
- Transition year - First year taxpayer required
to complete Schedule M-3 - Complete Part I
- Complete Columns b and c of Part II and Part III
- Year after transition year
- Must complete all portions of Schedule M-3
26Who Must File Schedule M-3?
- C corporations and U.S. consolidated groups
filing Form 1120 with at least 10 million in
assets must begin using new Schedule M-3 (in lieu
of Schedule M-1) for tax years ending on or after
December 31, 2004. - Partnerships with 10M or more in adjusted total
assets, 35M or more in total receipts, or is 50
or more owned by an LMSB or other taxpayer
required to file a Schedule M-3 - effective for
tax years ending on or after 12-31-06. (40 pages
of instructions) - Corporation that file Forms 1120PC, 1120L and
1120S. These M-3 will be used by property and
casualty insurance corporations, life insurance
corporations, and S corporation that have total
assets of 10M or more effective for tax years
ending on or after 12-31-06. (40 pages of
instructions)
27Who is NOT Required to File Schedule M-3?
- Taxpayers not required to file Schedule M-3 are
- C corporations and U.S. consolidated groups with
less than 10 million in assets
28Schedule M-3 is made up of three partsÂ
 Part One Financial Information and Net Income
(Loss) Reconciliation asks questions about the
corporations financial statements. Â Part Two
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) per Income
Statement of Includible Corporations with Taxable
Income per return. Â Part Three
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) per income
Statement of Includible Corporations with Taxable
Income per Return Expense/Deduction Items.
29How Many Schedule M-3s Does a Taxpayer Need to
Fill Out?
- Special rules for consolidated groups
- Example Parent with 3 subs 6 schedule M-3s
- One consolidated Schedule M-3 with Parts I, II,
and III completed to reflect activity for the
entire consolidated group - One Schedule M-3 for parent and each subsidiary
for its own activity in Parts II and Parts III - One Schedule M-3 to eliminate differences related
to intercompany transactions and to include
limitations on deductions (e.g., charitable
contribution and capital loss limitations) and
carryover amounts (e.g., charitable contribution
and capital loss carryovers)
30Â How Many Schedules M-3s Does A Taxpayer File ?
Parts I, II, and III of a Schedule M-3 by the
parent reflecting Part I information for the
entire group, and its own activity in Parts II
and III. Â Parts II and III of Schedule M-3 by
each of the three subsidiaries reflecting their
respective activity. Â Parts II and III of a
consolidating Schedule M-3 to account for items
such as differences between financial statement
net income and taxable income related to
intercompany transactions and adjustments made at
the consolidated group level not attributable to
any specific group member. Â One consolidated
Schedule M-3 with Parts I, II and III resulting
from consolidating those Schedules M-3s described
above.
31M-3, Part I Financial Information and Net
Income (Loss) Reconciliation
- General information identification of public
filings - Information on restatements
- Elimination of income from entities not included
in federal consolidated income tax return - Computes the consolidated income statement net
income or loss of all includible corporations in
theU.S. consolidated tax return and listed in
Form 851
32(No Transcript)
33Permanent v. Temporary Differences
- Taxpayers report Temporary differences in Parts
II and III, column (b) and Permanent
differences in Parts II and III,column (c) - If corporation uses GAAP
- Treat any item as temporary that GAAP treats as
temporary - Treat other items as permanent
- If corporation does not use GAAP or prepare
financial statements - Temporary - if it will reverse in future year or
it is a reversal from a prior year - Permanent - if it will not reverse in a future
year or it is not a reversal from a prior year - Treat as permanent if unable to determine
34M-3, Part II - Income (Loss) Items
- Lines 1-25 (with 6 subparts) - 31 specific line
itemsof income (loss) items - Line 26 any difference not included in lines
1-25 - Line 29 No differences in book/tax treatment
andnot included in Lines 1-25
35M-3, Part II (cont.) Reportable Transactions
Line 12
- All items related to a transaction for which you
file a Form 8886 are reported in Columns a
through d of Line12, Part II - Do not report any item on a specified line
- Report on Line 12 even if there is no difference
- Example - Two abandonment losses
- One reportable transaction with 18 million loss
- Part II, Line 12 Reportable transaction with
18 million loss with required statement or
attachment - One not a reportable transaction with 15 million
loss - Part II, Line 23e - 15 million with no statement
or attachment
36M-3, Part II (cont.) Reportable Transactions
Line 12
- Each difference for each Form 8886 must be
separately statedand adequately disclosed - Sequentially numbers each Form 8886 and lists by
identifying number on the supporting schedule the
amounts required foreach column of Line 12 for
each Form 8886 or - Attaches a schedule for each Form 8886
- Describes the reportable transaction for which
amounts are reported on Line 12 - Provides name and any required identifying number
on Form 8886 - Provides type of reported transaction
- For listed transactions, include description on
Line 3 of Form 8886 - If reportable transaction is from indirect
ownership, e.g., partnership, include name and
EIN as on Line 5 of Form 8886
37Reportable Transaction Disclosure
- If a transaction reported on Schedule M-3 meets
any of the reportable transaction criteria (e.g.,
section 165 loss transaction), the taxpayer must
still complete a Form 8886 and send it to OTSA
38New Schedule M-3
- Corporation required to report in Parts II and
III any item listed in the Schedule M-3 that is
included in the financial statements or books and
records - Even if no difference with tax
- Dormant or inactive corporations
- No separate Schedule M-3, but parent must list
- Disregarded entity
- No separate Schedule M-3 treated as items of
owner
39(No Transcript)
40M-3, Part III Expense/Deduction Items
- Lines 1-34 Specific line items of
expense/deductions - Line 35 All other differences not included in
lines 1-34 - Line 29, Part II All items with no differences
inbook/tax treatment and not included in Lines
1-34
41(No Transcript)
42Practical Issues Associated with M-3
- Systems Issues
- Reclassification post GL
- Need to disclose detail behind each transaction
not just net numbers - Support schedules showing each item in the line
will need to be attached - Inconsistency with Classifications of income
statement items - GAAP reconciling items
- Increased Compliance Burden
43Q A