Title: Warwickshire County Council April 2005 Overall vs Education
1Warwickshire County Council April 2005 Overall
vs Education
Warwickshire County CouncilSynovate 941220 April
2005
2Order of Presentation
- Background Methodology
- Results - Calls
- - Visits
- - Letters
- - Emails
- Conclusions
3Background
- WCC is committed to continual appraisal of its
strategy and to improve services provided to the
public, especially by front line staff - Standards set out in Charter
- Been conducting Mystery Shopping Checks since
2000 to examine service delivery
4Research Objectives
- To measure service delivery across all key
departments in line with Charter levels - To monitor the service over time
- From time to time, we include any additional
areas of interest, for instance we focussed the
research on ethnic callers in one wave and on
redirected enquiries in another
5Methodology
- Mystery shopping contacts by visit, calls,
letters emails to front-line departments
6Contacts by Department
7Details of Methodology
- Enquiries made over a 4 week period allowing 10
working days for any replies to be received - All contacts made by local evaluators to ensure
realistic - Appropriate scenarios used for each department
- Originally repeated measures quarterly
- Results aggregated across scenarios and
departments - Please note some base sizes for department data
are low. - Throughout this presentation results are compared
to data from previous waves. Although still
comparable it is important to note that the
mystery shopping evaluation sheet was revised
between waves 7 and waves 8.
8Calls
9 Getting Through On First Attempt
Getting Through
Average No. Of Rings Before Answer
Base All answering Overall (129), Education
(26)
Base All answering Overall (116), Education
(25)
- Educations performance matches that of all
depts on average
10Call Handling
Transfer Process
Call Handler
(16)
(26)
(4)
(16)
(13)
(4)
(4)
Base All who spoke to a call handler (Overall
116, Education 25)
Base All who were transferred (Overall 26,
Education 4)
Caution low base
- Standards Charter states that call handlers
should give their name
11 Answered Query Correctly
Enquiry Handler
Checking Satisfaction/Understanding
Base All answering Overall (116), Education
(25)
Base All answering Overall (116), Education
(25)
- Over half Education enquiries answered correctly,
checking for satisfaction and understanding is
lower than overall
12Leaflets Website
Sent leaflets/literature
directed to website
8 out of 13
12 out of 25
4 out of 9
15 out of 38
Base All expecting leaflet/literature Overall
(38), Education (13)
Base All expecting to be directed to website
Overall (25), Education (9)
- Charts show percentages of those expecting to
receive some form of literature or directions to
the WCC website based on their scenario.
13Staff Ratings
Overall
Education
Base All answering Overall (116), Education
(25)
- Ediucation ratings are mostly lower than overall
14Overall Satisfaction With Enquiry
Handling
4.0
3.9
Very Dissatisfied
Fairly Dissatisfied
Neither/nor
Fairly satisfied
Very satisfied
Base Overall (129), Education (26),
15Summary - Calls
- Good level of callers getting through on their
first attempt - On average calls answered well within 5 rings
- Call handlers greet and provide their name more
than other depts overall, improvements could be
made in providing their department or service
name to callers. - Just over half enquiries answered correctly
priority for improvement - Checking for satisfaction and understanding with
enquiries could be improved - Provision of relevant leaflets/literature could
also be improved - Staff ratings shows good scores for politeness
but lower scores for problem solving
16Visits
17Reception
being seen immediately
verbally greeted by receptionist
Base All answering Overall (60), Education (8)
Base All answering Overall (60), Education (8)
- Results for initial Education reception contacts
lower than overall
18Reception
wore name tag/plaque on desk
passed to another member of staff
Base All answering Overall (60), Education (8)
Base All answering Overall (60), Education (8)
- Standards Charter states that staff should wear
an identity badge
19Visit Experiences
Passed to other staff member
Initial Contact
(8)
(7)
(2)
(5)
(7)
(6)
Base All who visited reception (Overall 60,
Education 8)
Base All who were transferred to another person
(Overall 10, Education 3)
Caution low base
- Education dept scores well on initial contact
20Ratings Of Place Visited
Overall
Education
Base All answering Overall (60), Education (8)
- Ratings of Reception environment higher than
average
21 Answered Query Correctly
Enquiry Handler
Checking Satisfaction/Understanding
Base All answering Overall (60) Education (8)
Base All answering Overall (60), Education (8)
- Education enquiries were answered
comprehensively
22Leaflets Website
Given leaflets/literature
directed to website
8 out of 15
2 out of 38
N/A
N/A
All expecting leaflet/literature Overall (15),
Education (1)
All expecting to be directed to website Overall
(38), Education (3)
- Charts show percentages of those expecting to
receive some form of literature or directions to
the WCC website based on their scenario.
23Staff Ratings
Overall
Education
Base All answering Overall (60), Education (8)
- Education ratings outperform overall depts in
every category
24Overall Satisfaction With Enquiry
Handling
4.2
4.9
Very Dissatisfied
Fairly Dissatisfied
Neither/nor
Fairly satisfied
Very satisfied
Base Overall (60), Education (8),
25Summary - Visits
- Initial waiting time scored low could be
improved - Actual contact with receptionist is satisfactory
- Reception environment is good
- Ratings of reception environment are good - staff
are rated highly for warmth and friendliness - Enquiry handling and staff ratings are good
26Letters
27Replies Received To Letter Enquiry
Letter Contacts
Receiving No Reply To Letter
Base All receiving reply - Overall (57)
Education (4) All receiving acknowledgment -
Overall (17) Education (0) All Receiving full
reply - Overall (45 ) Education (2)
Base All answering Overall (57) Education (4)
- Over half letter contacts did not receive a reply
28 Answered Query Correctly
Enquiry Handler
Reply Easy To Understand
Base All answering Overall (46) Education (2)
Base All answering Overall (40), Education (2)
- Disappointingly, all enquiries were not answered
correctly
29Leaflets Website
Given leaflets/literature
Directed to website
23 out of 31
4 out of 24
All expecting leaflet/literature Overall (31),
Education (0)
All expecting to be directed to website Overall
(24), Education (0)
- Charts show percentages of those expecting to
receive some form of literature or directions to
the WCC website based on their scenario.
30Staff Ratings
Overall
Education
Base All answering Overall (40), Education (2)
- Education ratings are much lower than those
overall
31Overall Satisfaction With Enquiry
Handling
3.7
2.5
Very Dissatisfied
Fairly Dissatisfied
Neither/nor
Fairly satisfied
Very satisfied
Base Overall (57), Education (4)
32Summary - Letters
- The level of response to letters was
unsatisfactory letter response rates should be
made a priority - Where sent letter responses speedily dispatched
and easy to understand - Education department should aim to answer all
enquiries correctly - Staff ratings lower than average
33Emails
34Replies Received To Email Enquiry
Email Contacts
Receiving No Reply To Email
Base All receiving reply - Overall (74)
Education (15) All receiving acknowledgment -
Overall (23) Education (5) All Receiving full
reply - Overall (56) Education (11)
Base All answering Overall (74) Education (15)
- Email contacts received a reply within a short
period of time
35 Answered Query Correctly
Enquiry Handler
Reply Easy To Understand
Base All answering Overall (58) Education (12)
Base All answering Overall (57), Education (12)
- Three quarters of email enquiries answered
correctly
36Leaflets Website
Given leaflets/literature
Directed to website
5 out of 8
2 out of 4
3 out of 5
7 out of 16
All expecting leaflet/literature Overall
(8),Education (4)
All expecting to be directed to website Overall
(16), Education (5)
- Charts show percentages of those expecting to
receive some form of literature or directions to
the WCC website based on their scenario.
37Staff Ratings
Overall
Education
Base All answering Overall (57), Education (12)
- Education ratings lower than those for overall
depts
38Overall Satisfaction With Enquiry
Handling
3.9
3.6
Very Dissatisfied
Fairly Dissatisfied
Neither/nor
Fairly satisfied
Very satisfied
Base Overall (74), Education (15),
39Summary - Emails
- The level of response to emails was satisfactory
- On average a full email response was given in no
more than 2 ½ days - 7 out 10 responses were answered correctly room
for improvement - All responses were easy to understand
- Around half of those respondents expecting to,
received leaflets or were directed to the WCC
website
40Conclusions
- Should aim for a higher level of correctly
answered telephone, letter and email enquiries - An area that might encourage a better rate of
correctly answered telephone enquiries is
increased checks of caller satisfaction and
understanding of any advice that has been given - Contact with the Education reception and the
general reception environment are good there is
room for improvement in waiting times before
being seen at reception - Letter enquiries need attention level of
response to letters unsatisfactory
41(No Transcript)