Title: Green Supply Chain Management Analytical framework
1Green Supply Chain Management Analytical
framework
Environmental dimension
Input
Process
(process inventory or environmental impact
indicator of process)
Output
2Green Supply Chain Management Analytical
framework
Economic dimension
Input
Process
Output
value added
3Supplier Customer Relationship Industrial
Ecology Perspective
- Suppliers are providers of
- Direct materials
- Indirect material
- Low-entropy energy
- Customers are users of
- Direct materials
- Indirect material
- Low-entropy energy
Production process
Direct materials
Economic output
Indirect materials
Wastes emissions
Low-entropy energy
High-entropy energy
4Supplier contracts and input productivity
Producer of yConsumer of x
Output quantity y
Input quantity x
(e.g. doors)
(e.g. paint)
Input productivity
- Supplier contract
- Specifies how consumer of x (customer) pays
producer of x (supplier). - Contracts can be based on a variety of criteria
- Volume unit price of paint x volume of paint
- Service unit service fee x amount of service
- Volume and service (mixed contract) unit
service fee x amount of service unit paint
fee x volume of paint
5- Reiskin et al (2000) Reducing chemical
throughput through servicizing - 2 key preconditions
- Function-to-volume ratio (productivity) of
material is not constant - Supplier able to change business model from
selling material into selling service
- Motivation for supplier
- Building stronger relationship with customer
- Knowledge about the needs of the customer gives
competitive advantage
- Motivation for customer
- Cost of chemical use typically far exceeds
purchase cost (large savings potential) - Direct access to expertise of the chemical
producer - Less resources diverted from core competencies
6Volume-based contract and constant input
productivity
Input quantity x
Output quantity y
(e.g. doors)
(e.g. paint)
Input productivity
Supplier profits
Customer profits
Sell more
Incentives aligned!
Economic driver regarding input x
Use more
7Volume-based contract and constant input
productivity
- Paint/door example
- Supplier paid per gallon of paint
- Input productivity fixed (constant amount of
paint per door) - The economic incentives of supplier and customer
are aligned - Customer Sell more doors, i.e. use more paint
- Supplier Sell more paint
- Other examples
- Manufacturer and wholesaler
- Wholesaler and retailer
8Volume-based contract and variable input
productivity
Input quantity x
Output quantity y
(e.g. doors)
(e.g. paint)
y is not a function of x
Supplier profits
Customer profits
Sell more
Conflicting incentives!
Economic driver regarding input x
Use less
9Volume-based contract and variable input
productivity
- Paint/door example
- Supplier paid per gallon of paint
- Paint required to paint door is variable
- The economic incentives of supplier and customer
are conflicting - Customer Sell more doors using less paint
- Supplier Sell more paint
- Other examples
- Direct materials Manufacturing yield of
materials (prompt scrap) - Indirect materials Solvents, lubricants,
cleaning agents, packaging - This is the standard situation for direct and
indirect material suppliers
10Service-based contract and variable input
productivity
Input quantity x
Output quantity y
(e.g. doors)
(e.g. paint)
y is not a function of x
Supplier profits
Customer profits
Use less
Incentives stillnot aligned!
Economic driver regarding input x
Indifferent
11Mixed contract and variable input productivity
Input quantity x
Output quantity y
(e.g. doors)
(e.g. paint)
y is not a function of x
Supplier profits
Customer profits
Use less
Economic driver regarding input x
Incentives aligned!
Use less
12Service-based contract and variable input
productivity
- Paint/door example
- Supplier paid per painted door
- Paint required to paint door is variable
- The economic incentives of supplier and customer
are not quite aligned - Customer Customer is indifferent with respect
to paint use - Supplier Use less paint per painted door
Mixed contract and variable input productivity
- Paint/door example
- Supplier paid per painted door and gallon of
paint - Paint required to paint door is variable
- The economic incentives of supplier and customer
are now aligned - Customer Use less paint per painted door
- Supplier Use less paint per painted door
13- Reiskin et al (2000) Reducing chemical
throughput through servicizing - Challenges
- Difficulty of transferring such a complex task
as chemicals management to a supplier - Individual and organizational resistance to
change - Increase in interdependency between supplier and
customer - May be regarded as outsourcing (including job
losses etc.)
Summary
- Goal of servicizing Increase productivity of
material inputs (direct or indirect) - Obstacle Supplier usually have incentive to
sell more (volume-based contract) - Response Supplier contract based on service
- Danger That customer looses incentive to reduce
material inputs - Solution Find contracts and business models
that align supplier and customer
incentives in the best possible way
14Reading for Monday, April 16 Chouinard Y,
Brown M (1997) Going Organic Converting
Patagonias Product Line, Journal of Industrial
Ecology 1(1) pp 117 - 130 Posted on course
website. Speaker for Monday Michael Brown,
Environmental Consultant, Santa Barbara