Forecasting Models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Forecasting Models

Description:

Not taking into account the impact the changes have later in a project ... Alcon Laboratories Building G Project. Austin Ventures Project. CarrAmerica Project ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: davidw156
Learn more at: https://s2.smu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Forecasting Models


1
Forecasting Models
  • Forecasting Change in the Construction Industry
  • By David Walls

2
Austin Commercial
  • Large Construction Manager
  • Based in Texas
  • Operations throughout the United States
  • Past customers include
  • Intel
  • Texas Instruments
  • Exxon
  • EDS
  • FED
  • SMU

3
Austin Commercials Problem
  • Problem Dealing with change in construction
  • Large amount of changes taking place
  • Not taking into account the impact the changes
    have later in a project
  • Uncertainty in knowing what was causing change
    and what impacts change had

4
Problem Analysis
  • Discussions with Austins Management
  • Two main indicators of change in a construction
    project
  • RFIs (Request for Information)
  • New drawings issued
  • Austins needs
  • A way to predict potential changes at any given
    point in project
  • Impact of those changes on cost

5
Research and Data Collection
  • Designed a spreadsheet to collect data
  • RFIs and new drawings broken down monthly over
    the life of the project
  • Broken down into Divisions
  • Architectural
  • Structural
  • Civil
  • Mechanical
  • Electrical
  • Cost Information
  • Compiled a list of Project that were wanted

6
Spreadsheet
7
Projects
  • Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, and Field Project
  • Alcon Laboratories Building G Project
  • Austin Ventures Project
  • CarrAmerica Project
  • Clark, Thomas, and Winters Project
  • Crossmark Project
  • CTW Storage/Fitness Center Project
  • Ft. Worth Convention Center Phase 1 Project
  • Ft. Worth Convention Center Phase 2 Project
  • Hall Office Project
  • Love Field CUP Project
  • Mabel Peters Caruth Center Project
  • Terrace V Project (RFI info only)
  • TriQuint Semiconductor Project
  • University of North Texas Recreation Center
    Project
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Project

8
Situation Analysis
  • Calculated the Percentage of RFIs and new
    drawings that were complete at key points in a
    project (10 25 50 75 100)
  • By division and Total
  • Decided to use regression modeling
  • Could obtain the most accurate fit of the
    relationship between the inputs and outputs of
    the project

9
Regression Models
  • Two Regression Models
  • Cubic (polynomial) Regression Model
  • best fit line (cubic) for the relationship
    between the percentage complete in the job and
    the percentage of the RFIs or new drawings
    issued out of the total
  • Multiple Regression Model
  • Best fit (linear) for the relationships between
    the costs of a project and totals for RFIs and
    new drawings and initial budget

10
Cubic Regression Model
  • Used Minitab to solve a cubic regression model
  • For total RFIs and by division
  • For total new drawings and by division
  • Allow forecast of total RFIs and total new
    drawings by division at the end of the project

11
Example
12
RFIs Compared
13
New Drawing Compared
14
Multiple Regression Models
  • Two Models were solved
  • The total change in cost on a project
  • The overall total cost of a project
  • Based on the historical totals for RFIs and new
    drawings by division, and Austin initial
    forecasted budget

15
Two Models
  • Using both models together
  • Forecast total for RFIs and new drawings based
    on initial input of percent complete of the job
    and current totals of RFIs and new drawings
  • Use those forecast to forecast the total change
    in cost of the project and overall total cost of
    project

16
Model Output
  • Cubic Regression Models
  • High R-squared terms
  • Civil models had highest R-squared terms also
    had largest confidence intervals
  • Architectural models had S-squared terms of 100
    - had the smallest confidence intervals
  • Multiple Regression Models
  • High R-squared terms
  • Total RFI and Civil RFI variables seemed too have
    largest influence in both models
  • Low probability that there terms where zero
  • Total cost model more accurate that total change
    in cost model
  • Significantly higher F-ratio and corresponding
    P-value (probability)
  • Overall both models were strong and did good job
    of representing the data

17
Sample Output
18
Sample Output
19
Sample Output Continued
20
Recommendations
  • Austin should use these models to help forecast
    RFIs and new drawings issued and their cost
    impacts
  • Spreadsheet to allow Austin use these forecast
    models
  • Austin should collect monthly RFI and new
    drawings issued information on all of its jobs
  • Give current information to run forecasts with
  • Provide historical data to add to current models
    to make more accurate
  • Conclusion With the help of these models and
    Austin Commercials realization and efforts to
    solve this change management problem, I believe
    Austin Commercial can set itself apart from its
    competitors and better serve its customers in the
    long run.

21
Spreadsheet
22
Assumptions and Limitations
  • Only uses data from last 3 years assumes last 3
    years is indicative of future
  • Projects that were used for data ranged from cost
    of about 500,000 to 50,000,000 model may not
    be accurate for extremely large projects
  • Assumes RFIs and new drawings issued are the
    best indicators for change in a project
  • Amount of projects used - Would have like to
    included more projects in the data (hopefully
    more data will be available in the future)

23
Thanks and Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com