Second Annual Progress Seminar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Second Annual Progress Seminar

Description:

mobile receiver. FIR filter with complete channel knowledge. 6. The chip waveform ... Does not boost the transmit power. 12. 13. The signal total signal. After ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:200
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: gkan6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Second Annual Progress Seminar


1
Second Annual Progress Seminar Supervisor Prof.
S. N. Merchant
2
MPOE Prefiltering
3
  • ?DS-CDMA Limited by
  • 1. MAI (Multiple users)
  • 2. ISI (Multipath Channel)
  • ? Multi-user signal processing overcomes MAI
    ISI
  • ? Difficult to implement in handsets
  • ? Ideally suitable for uplink transmission
  • ? Prefiltering provides a way for downlink
    transmission

Signal MAI Noise
4
System model for Joint Prefiltering
1. FIR filter 2. What is the criterion for design
5
  • ? MMSE optimal for AWGN channels.
  • y x ?
  • ? MPOE significantly better than MMSE in
    interference 1

  • y ?

  • ? We develop prefilter to minimize probability
    of error in
  • mobile receiver
  • ? FIR filter with complete channel knowledge

6
  • ? The chip waveform
  • ? The signal for user u is

  • ? The total transmitted signal
  • ? The x(t) is sampled and prefiltered

7
  • ? The received signal after matched filtering
  • ? Conditional probability of error is
    formulated.
  • 1. Since base station knows tx bits
  • 2. Provides Linear complexity 1
  • ? Conditional probability of error expression
    is



8
  • ? The joint conditional probability of error is
  • ? By invoking independency assumption
  • ? By invoking indentical assumption


  • ? Simple gradient search is used to find the
    prefilter coefficients

9
System model for Individual Prefiltering
10
How to improve the performance further
  • ?Diversity techniques can be used to improve
    performance.
  • Instead of transmitting the signal through one
    antenna, we send it through M different antennae.
  • ? Since the knowledge of the channel is assumed,
    we can
  • take further advantage of this information

11
  • ? MRT provides full transmit antenna diversity
    when the channel information is available
  • ? Channel estimation is not feasible at the
    receiver,
  • hence STBC is not considered
  • The beamforming weights are calculated adaptively
  • ? MRT is suitable
  • Does not require complex receiver
  • Does not boost the transmit
    power

12
(No Transcript)
13
The signal total signal
After simple manipulation
Signal transmitted from MRT m is
14
  • Simulation parameters
  • Number of users 4 (U)
  • Chip gain 128 (N)
  • Correlation coefficients of PN code (0.1)
  • Channel complex Gaussian mean 0.5 variance
    0.1655
  • Channel FIR filter length 5
  • Prefilter length 4

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
MPOE Prefiltering for statistical channel
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Multihop cellular Network
29
Cross layer routing protocol
Node constraints 1. Cooperation of the nodes.
2. Connectivity of the nodes. 3. The
interference caused by the call
initiating/forwarding nodes. Path
constraints 1. End-End throughput 2.
End-End delay
30
Cooperations
31
Connectivity
  • We select nodes which has sufficient number of
    neighbors.
  • We select nodes which has 5.1774(log(n))
    number of neighbors.
  • To make sure that call is intact
  • Reference
  • F. Xue and P. Kumar, The number of neighbors
    needed for connectivity of wireless networks.
    SpringerWireless Networks, vol. 10, pp. 169.181,
    Mar 2004

32
Interference
G -- Processing gain -- PN code cross
correlation n -- number of nodes Pij
-- Transmitted power
33
End-End Throughput
? Defined as the probability of successful
transmission from source to destination
Which involves successful transmission
at each and every intermediate nodes.
The successful transmission from node i to node
its neighbor node j (single hop) occur
when the received SINR at node j
from node i is stronger than a ß
13
34
? Message is successfully transmitted from source
1 to destination h is given by
?This gives lower bound on end-end throughput
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Simulation results
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
Access Mechanism Design
  • OFDM-CDMA based access mechanism
  • Source node, destination node intermediate relay
    nodes will be grouped together
  • CDMA PN code assigned to each group
  • In a particular the hops are assigned with OFDM
    carriers

45
Spreading codes are chosen according to the data
rate requirements
46
Code reuse
47
Open problems
  • Capacity analysis
  • At a time how many such a
    communication can take place for a given
    interference level
  • Graph coloring problem
  • 2. Code reuse
  • Is it possible to reuse the CDMA
    spreading code at far distance
  • 3. Proper NOVSF design
  • Is it possible to reuse the CDMA
    spreading code at far distance

48
Open problems
  • Error propagation along the path
  • 2. MPOE for multihop communication
  • 3. Mobile to mobile fading channel design

49
MIMO Relay networks
50
Thanks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com