ECE 552 Multiple Image enhancement Techniques - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

ECE 552 Multiple Image enhancement Techniques

Description:

Implement various Image Enhancement techniques on an image on the AMIRIX board. ... Simulate the techniques using MATLAB/C compiler on ... Contrast Stretching : ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: vik83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECE 552 Multiple Image enhancement Techniques


1
ECE 552 Multiple Image enhancement Techniques
  • Team BLUE
  • Deepak Jayaram
  • Jayanth Kruttiventi
  • Naresh Karnam
  • Vikas Y V

2
Contents
  • Objective.
  • Enhancement Techniques.
  • Project Flow.
  • Explanation of each technique.
  • Simulation waveforms.
  • Problems Faced.
  • Distribution of work.

3
Objective
  • Implement various Image Enhancement techniques on
    an image on the AMIRIX board.
  • Simulate the techniques using MATLAB/C compiler
    on the image.
  • Compare and contrast the results.

4
Enhancement Techniques
  • Noise Removal from a corrupted Image.
  • Contrast Stretching of a Noise-free Image.
  • Histogram Equalization of the Image.

5
Project Flow
6
Noise Removal
  • An Image corrupted by Gaussian Noise is taken and
    averaged using an Averaging filter.
  • The filtering of the noise is done by using a
    mask of 33 mask with all the coefficients being
    one.

Noisy Image
Noise-Free Image
7
The Masking Process
  • The mask is applied to each pixel of the image
    and averaged.

Doutbuf(31 down to 24)
Doutbuf(23 down to 16)
Doutbuf(15 down to 8)
Doutbuf(7 down to 0)
8
Flowchart
Scan every pixel in the image, 8 pixels at a time
and read 3 neighborhood rows
Calculate the Average intensity values from the
33 neighborhood pixels and assign it to the
center pixel
Increment the address to be written by 4096 to
store the averaged values in a new location, 4
pixels at a time
9
Image obtained through VHDL for input image of
size 512x512
10
Contrast Stretching
  • The Noise Free Image obtained from the above step
    is then enhanced using this method.
  • This is a point based image processing technique
    which involves multiplying the intensity of each
    pixel with a slope (m) and adding a constant (b)
    to it.
  • The formula is given by New m Old b

Noise Free Image Contrast
Stretched Image
11
Flowchart
Scan every pixel in the image, 4 pixels at a time
Multiply intensity level with a slope and add an
intercept
Is new level gt 255?
Y
N
Assign the new intensity value to that pixel
Set the new intensity value to that pixel to 255
12
Histogram Equalization
  • The histogram of the Image obtained from the
    previous step is plotted and it is equalized
    between the maximum and minimum intensity levels
    of the image.
  • The equalized values are again applied to the
    image to obtain the final image.

Contrast Enhanced Image
Histogram Equalized Image
13
Flowchart
Scan every pixel in the image, 4 pixels at a time
Count each distinct pixel value in the image and
store them in an array, incrementing each array
element based on pixel intensity
Calculate the sum of all intensity values for
every gray Level from 0 to that gray level.
Normalize the array by multiplying each array
element by its maximum pixel value divided by
Total no. of pixels.
14
Histograms
Histogram Of the Final Image
  • Histogram of Contrast Enhanced Image

15
Simulation ResultsNoise Removal
16
Simulation ResultsContrast Stretching
17
Simulation ResultsHistogram Equalization
18
Problems Faced
  • When the masking technique was implemented in
    VHDL, the logic worked perfectly with the
    simulation results validating it. However, when
    the logic was implemented on the Pilchard
    machine, the resulting image seemed to be written
    only once every 4 bytes. This lead to the image
    having black bars in between.
  • The rewriting of the averaged values requires
    new memory locations since the previous values
    should be used for the next iterations. Also the
    next 3 average values would also be required in
    order to write back one finished line.
  • The mask being a 33 in size, it required
    reading of 9 pixels in 3 consecutive rows at a
    time from the DPRAM.
  • In Contrast Enhancement, the math operational
    logic worked perfectly during simulation, however
    it resulted in error during synthesis. The
    Synopsys version was not able to support few
    operations like power etc..
  • Securing a connection to the Pilchard
    machines and trying to get hold of the Kermit
    process before anyone else does was the biggest
    problem of all!!! ?

19
Distribution of work
  • Chakradhar/Naresh Noise removal
  • Vikas Contrast Stretching
  • Deepak Histogram Equalization
  • All of us together Data transfer problems and
    rectifications.

20
Thank You!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com