T-76.115 Project Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

T-76.115 Project Review

Description:

achieving the goals of the iteration. project metrics. Work results (15 min) ... Natalia -68. Total -4. Pihla -3. Niko -17. Minttu -8. Susse -13. Pipsa -6. Matti. Diff ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: JariVa9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: T-76.115 Project Review


1
T-76.115 Project Review
  • ITSUPS
  • Project Planning4.11.2004

2
Agenda
  • Project status (10 min)
  • achieving the goals of the iteration
  • project metrics
  • Work results (15 min)
  • presenting the iterations results
  • Used work practices (5 min)

3
Introduction to the project
  • Project plan The purpose of the project is to
    make the traffic simulation system of the
    laboratory of transportation engineering, HUTSIM,
    to collaborate with ViaSyss city planning tool

4
Status of the iterations goals
  • Project planning
  • OK
  • Understanding the domain
  • Hard to measure. We have studied the material
    available. (OK)
  • Requirements on general level with priorities
  • OK -gt Requirements Document
  • Most important use cases
  • OK -gt Requirements Document
  • Roles and responsibilities
  • Done. Roles although tend to change.
  • Getting to know Ampel-architecture
  • We have studied it. Further studies will be done
    in next iteration.
  • Tools, practices (defining and taking into use)
  • Defined, most of us have already taken them into
    use.
  • Setting up development environment
  • Some of us have installed them
  • SEPA
  • Meeting practices and static methods started.

5
Status of the iterations deliverables
  • Project Plan
  • First version 18.10.
  • The latest version gives a good description of
    the project
  • Requirements document
  • Based on Ampel-requirements
  • First version 18.10.
  • Includes the most important requirements and use
    cases

6
Realization of the tasks
  • Mistakes in planning
  • estimation problems
  • problems with Trapoli
  • hard to choose which task we are doing

7
Working hours by person
Realized hours in this iteration
Real Plan Diff
Matti 59 65 -6
Pipsa 42 55 -13
Susse 37 45 -8
Minttu 28 45 -17
Niko 42 45 -3
Pihla 41 45 -4
Natalia 38 55 -17
Total 287 355 -68
  • Iteration took less time than expected
  • Differences between members is mainly caused by
    lecture activity

8
Working hours by person
Realized hours in this iteration
Plan in the beginning of this iteration
Real Plan Diff
Matti 59 65 -6
Pipsa 42 55 -13
Susse 37 45 -8
Minttu 28 45 -17
Niko 42 45 -3
Pihla 41 45 -4
Natalia 38 55 -17
Total 287 355 -68
PP I1 I2 FD Total
Matti 65 40 40 45 190
Pipsa 55 45 50 40 190
Susse 45 50 55 40 190
Minttu 45 60 45 40 190
Niko 45 60 45 40 190
Pihla 45 45 55 45 190
Natalia 55 45 50 40 190
Total 355 350 335 290 1330
Latest plan (inc. realized hours and other
updates)
  • Project planning took less time than expected
  • Unused hours are moved in the next iterations

PP I1 I2 FD Total
Matti 59 45 45 41 190
Pipsa 42 53 55 40 190
Susse 37 58 55 40 190
Minttu 28 62 60 40 190
Niko 42 60 48 40 190
Pihla 41 49 55 45 190
Natalia 38 57 55 40 190
Total 287 388 372 286 1330
9
Risks
  • What is the current situation regarding the
    risks?
  • Laboratory of Transportation and ViaSys have
    different goals
  • Big problem
  • ITSUPS is trying to find a compromise
  • The customers provides faulty hardware
  • Problem was fixed quickly

10
Results of the iteration
  • Project Plan
  • First version as early as 18.10. to the customer
    and ViaSys
  • Second version 24.10. to the mentor for
    comments
  • For the latest version we had a document
    read-through 31.10. (Sepa)
  • The latest version gives a good description of
    the project
  • Requirements document
  • Based on Ampel-requirements
  • First version 18.10. to the customer and ViaSys
  • Second version 24.10. to the mentor for
    comments
  • The requirements document was updated based on
    ViaSys meeting 20.10.
  • For the latest version we had a document
    read-through 31.10. (Sepa)
  • Includes the most important requirements and use
    cases

11
Used work practices
  • Time reporting
  • Problems with Trapoli-system
  • SEPAs
  • Static methods
  • Document reviews
  • Meeting practices
  • Well-planned meetings
  • No unnecessary meetings
  • Only needed members present
  • Agendas
  • Refactoring and Test automation are taken into
    use later
  • TikiWiki
  • Information channel (the most important things
    can be collected there)
  • ToDo-list was taken into use
  • Iteration planning, documenting also used
  • Found useful
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com