Title: Agency Relationships and Agency Theory
1Incentives in Firms
2Incentive Mechanisms
- Implicit contracts
- Subjective evaluation
- Proportion tournaments
- Threat of termination
3Implicit Incentive Contracts
- Explicit incentive contracts are contracts that
can be enforced by an outside third party - For many jobs, performance measures are not
perfect - Implicit contracts can work in the form of
supervisors assessment
4Implicit Incentive Contracts
- To make implicit contracts work, the firm should
- ensure that the employees perceive that the firm
is acting in accordance with the contract - ensure that the performance standards are being
applied consistently across the organization - communicate clearly with the employees in the
event unforeseen conditions preclude the payment
of the expected rewards
5Subjective Performance Evaluation
- Assessment takes into account factors that make
it easy or difficult to attain the goals - Supervisors reluctance to punish certain
employees could lead to ratings compression - Subjective assessments are subject to influence
activity
6Subjective Performance Evaluation
- Some firms use 360-degree peer review
- Some use a fixed pool of points to allocate to
employees - Grading on a curve can address ratings
compression - Firms may limit influence activity by limiting
access to decision makers
7Promotion Tournaments
- Since higher levels have fewer position than
lower levels, not every worker can be promoted to
the next level - The contest among workers to be promoted to the
next level is like an athletic tournament - Promotion tournaments can provide incentives
against shirking
8Promotion Tournaments
- Promotions typically involve marked pay increases
- Employees have strong incentives to take actions
that will enhance their chances of being promoted - Promotion criteria are not typically part of an
explicit contract
9Promotion Tournaments
- Probability of promotion depends on effort
- Wage increase
- Cost of effort
- Each contestant will maximize
10Promotion Tournament
- Contestants effort depends on marginal benefit
of effort - Firms can increase to make the
contestants work harder - Can either raise or reduce
11Promotion and Tournaments
- As the number of contestants increases,
decreases - The size of the prize should
increase as we have more contestants - If there are multiple levels of tournaments, the
wage differentials increase with the level - Winning in one level gives the winners the chance
to compete in the next level
12Promotion Tournaments
- Winner-take-all reward counteracts ratings
compression - Tournaments work as relative performance
evaluation
13Disadvantage of Tournaments
- Best performance in one level needs not indicate
skills needed for the next level - Tournaments can encourage sabotage
14Threat of Firing and Efficiency Wages
- What constitutes satisfactory performance is
commonly understood within the firm - If performance is not satisfactory, worker is
fired - Firing is a punishment if wages are higher than
what is available in the market
15Efficiency Wages
- If employee keeps the job wagew
- If employee is fired wagew
- Assume cost of effort50
- Probability of detection, employee shirksp
- Employee will not shirk if gt50
16Efficiency Wage
- To make employees not shirk, the firm can
- Increase p
- Increase w
- Pool of unemployed workers provides incentives
for the employed
17Efficiency Wages
- Efficiency wages are useful when monitoring is
difficult - Non-wage benefits will make the jobs more
valuable and have an incentive effect
18Efficiency Wages
- At-will employment lowers the efficiency wage
needed to provide the incentive to not shirk - If the legal environment makes firing harder
efficiency wage has to increase - If firing is harder firms may choose alternate
means of providing incentives
19Incentive in Teams
- To achieve the full benefits of team production,
rewards need to be based on team output - With team based performance measures, benefits
from individuals actions and shared with the team - Some beneficial actions may not be undertaken
20Incentive in Teams
- If total benefit from action gt total cost of
action, it is a value creating action - Action will not be undertaken only if total
costgt - (n number of members in the team)
- Every team member lacks the incentive to take
valuable actions (free rider problem)
21Incentives in Teams
- Free rider problem is exacerbated if a team
member has another task on which he works alone - Weaker incentives for team-based tasks will
result in shift of effort to the individual-based
task
22Evidence on Incentive in Teams
- In medical practices, increase in the size of
partnerships lead to reductions in individual
productivity - Larger firms are less able to control costs
compared with smaller firms
23Incentives in Teams Solutions
- Team size can be kept small
- Team members can be made to cooperate by allowing
them to work for long periods - Teams can be structured so that team members can
monitor each other
24Problems with Stable Teams
- Teams that work over long periods can bring in
peer pressure and social norms to make the
members behave - However, stable teams do not permit the
observation of individual members abilities - Firms may rotate members among teams even if
there is a short run incentive-related cost
25Career Concerns and Long Term Employment
- In certain jobs, an important source of
incentives is employees career concerns - Employees undertake current actions that enhance
their future value in the labor market - Investment bankers , money managers, and
professional athletes are some examples
26Career Concerns and Long Term Employment
- Young mutual fund managers have strong incentives
to avoid poor relative performance - Managers with long track record can survive a bad
year - Evidence indicates that young managers are more
likely to follow the herd
27Career Concerns and Long Term Employment
- Career concerns are weak towards the end of ones
career - CEO pay is more closely tied to firm performance
as the CEO approaches retirement age - Contracts for older athletes include clauses for
reduction in pay if they do not succeed by
certain objective criteria
28Career Concern and Human Capital
- Employees who are likely to change jobs will be
interested in acquiring general purpose human
capital - They will be less willing to invest in firm
specific skills - A firm that relies on career concerns for
incentives will find it hard to make the
employees invest in firm specific skills
29Career Concern and Human Capital
- Firms may have to reward employees for acquiring
firm specific human capital - Offer long-term employment
- Promise steeper increase in pay over time
- Back loaded compensation
- Back loaded compensation can work as an
efficiency wage
30Incentives and Decision Making
- Recipients of information should have decision
making rights if - Information is difficult to communicate
- The value of information depreciates quickly
- Delegation of decision making authority should
hinge on whether the decision maker can be
rewarded/penalized for good/bad decisions
31Incentives and Decision Making
- Recent innovations such as Total Quality
Management and just-in-time production require
delegation of decision making to line workers - Adoption of such innovations should be done along
with the appropriate incentive policies