NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation at Utah State University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation at Utah State University

Description:

http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/advance ... Part of this is inherent to their jobs theater and concert performances in the evenings. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: adva2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation at Utah State University


1
NSF ADVANCEInstitutional Transformation at
Utah State University

2
NSF ADVANCE Overview
  • The purpose of the NSF ADVANCE program is to
    increase the participation of women in the
    scientific and engineering workforce through the
    increased representation and advancement of women
    in academic science and engineering careers.
    http//www.nsf.gov/home/
    crssprgm/advance
  • The Problem The last 10 years have shown
    significant increases in women scientists and
    engineers graduating with PhDs, but they are
    leaving academics at every stage of their
    careers.
  • To date, 19 institutions have been awarded
    transformation grants in two rounds of funding. A
    third round of proposals is currently under
    review.
  • USU is attempting to apply a business model to
    the university. Our strategy is to address
    issues that adversely affect effectiveness and
    satisfaction of all faculty members, but which
    have been shown to have a differential impact on
    women and minorities.

3
The Problem
4
USU Project Structure
  • Working with 4 colleges
  • Agriculture, Science, Engineering, Natural
    Resources
  • ADVANCEUS Team
  • Ronda Callister Assoc. Prof., Management
    Human Resources
  • Kim Sullivan - Assoc. Prof., Biology
  • Christine Hult Prof. of English, Assoc. Dean of
    Humanities, Arts Social Science
  • Robert Schmidt Assoc. Prof., Environment
    Society
  • Chris Hailey Prof. of Mechanical Engineering,
    Assoc. Dean of Engineering
  • Mary Feng Program Leader
  • Implementation Committee
  • Deans of the colleges, department heads from STEM
    departments, and key faculty

5
USU ADVANCE Goals
  • Goal 1 Recruitment Retention
  • Develop best practices on faculty recruitment.
    Disseminate information and tools to aid search
    committees.
  • Develop programs to increase faculty
    effectiveness and integration of work and
    personal life.
  • Assess clarity and implementation of PT policy
    and procedures.
  • Faculty Services Mediation, Dual Career
    Assistance, Childcare Center
  • Goal 3 Department Climate
  • Assess work climate in all departments
  • Foster faculty initiated programs which improve
    work environment and faculty effectiveness using
    dual-agenda model.
  • Study job satisfaction and obstacles to career
    success.
  • Goal 2 Collaboration
  • - Create methods to provide faculty with
  • accessible information on fellow
  • researchers, grant opportunities and
  • proposal development.
  • - Create ways to foster collaborative
  • research through seminars, brown bags,
  • seed money grants, etc.
  • Goal 4 ADVANCE USU Initiative
  • Assessment
  • Dissemination
  • Visibility
  • Sustainability

6
1 Recruitment
  • SERT (Science Engineering Recruitment Team)
  • Faculty based team 12 members
  • Goal Bring recruiting in line with available
    PhDs in disciplines
  • Team Mission
  • Collaborate with hiring committees to maximize
    the quality of potential hires by attracting a
    broad and diverse pool of qualified candidates.
  • Provide information to committees and departments
    on
  • Advertising strategies, Evaluation practices,
    Mentoring support, Faculty programs, Best
    practices
  • Provide support for
  • Non-departmental contact to meet with candidates
    and answer questions about the University
    community.
  • Non-departmental faculty member to serve on
    search committees as a resource advisor in
    enhancing diversity.

7
Recruiting Results
  • From Oct. 2003 to Oct. 2004, Utah State exceeded
    its hiring goals for tenure-track faculty women
    in 3 out of 4 of our STEM colleges.
  • 2003-2004 (First year after implementing SERT))
  • College/ New Tenure Track Faculty Hires/ Women
    Hired/ PhD Availability Rate
  • Hired 9 STEM women out of 22 total STEM hires
    (41)
  • - Agriculture/ 3 women hired out of 7 hires
    43 32
  • - Engineering/ 2 women hired out of 8 hires 25
    16
  • - Science/ 4 women hired out of 6 hires
    67 35
  • - The College of Natural Resources only had one
    open new hire and hired a male faculty
    member.
  • In contrast, during the year prior, 2002-2003,
    three out of the four STEM colleges did not meet
    the hiring goals for women. It is difficult to
    tie the successful results in recruiting women
    for the 2003-2004 recruiting year to one or two
    specific activities. Awareness of ADVANCE,
    various efforts by SERT and AA/EO, individual
    interventions with search committee members and
    department heads all play a part in the
    recruiting successes.
  • 2002-2003
  • Hired 3 STEM women out of 13 total STEM hires
    (17)
  • 2001-2002
  • Hired 2 STEM women out of 8 total STEM hires
    (25)

8
Retention
  • Tenure and Promotion
  • Surveys and interviews show the need for more
    transparency/clarity of policy and the need for
    administrator training on PT policy and process.
  • Training Workshops ADVANCE and the Provosts
    office is offering dept. head and faculty
    training on PT policy and process,
    non-traditional career paths, PT
    transparency/clarity, and a fact vs. fiction
    webpage.
  • Policy Review Revision Recommending changes to
    code for promotion to improve mentoring and
    accountability.
  • Transitional Support Pilot Program Small
    funding amounts available to those in life
    changing events to fill the gap so research
    does not suffer.
  • Leadership
  • Annual leadership series for Dept. Heads,
    emerging leaders, and women STEM faculty members.
  • Career Development
  • Administrator Faculty training workshops
    Workshops related to resolving conflict,
    negotiation skills, and others.
  • Faculty Mentor Programs Developed at the
    department level through intervention initiative.

9
Recruitment Retention
  • Improve Faculty Services
  • On-campus Child Care Center
  • Dual Career Services
  • Policy Review Revision Document outlining the
    policy and process for dual career assistance.
  • Dual Career Assistance Best Practices for
    faculty (or potential faculty), HR, and
    administrators in dual career situations.
  • Faculty Mediation Services
  • Part-time Tenure Track and extending tenure clock
    options
  • Changes in policy code for associate to full

10
Recruitment Retention Results
  • Child Care Center progress
  • Site and architect chosen fund-raising initiated
  • Dual Career Services
  • Policy Review Revision Policy and Protocol for
    dual career assistance now in place.
  • Dual Career Assistance Provost, working with
    ADVANCE, has now identified a set of Best
    Practices for faculty (or potential faculty),
    HR, and administrators in dual career situations.
    Matching funds have been set aside for this
    purpose.
  • Faculty Mediation Services and ombudspersons
  • Both now in place and working well
  • Part-time Tenure Track and extending tenure clock
    options
  • Committee is being formed to review policies and
    make recommendations through Faculty Senate
  • Policy code
  • Changes made to encourage mentoring from
    associate to full professor

11
2. Faculty Collaboration
  • Collaborative Research Seed Funding
  • Promoting Research Collaboration
  • Workshops, seminars, brown-bags to share research
    information. Developing a database and utilizing
    program such as SPINS/SMARTS that facilitate
    inter-disciplinary research exploration.
  • Seed Funding
  • Creating a seed fund for multi-investigative
    collaborative grants involving STEM women.
    Targeting 5 to 8 seed grants awarded per year to
    support proposal/research development leading to
    grant submissions.

12
Collaboration Results
  • VPR/SPO/ADVANCE joint Workshops
  • How to use research database systems grant
    writing skills technical writing skills working
    with NSF/NIH/other funding agencies. Inviting
    successful faculty to speak about their
    experience in receiving high profile research
    awards and grant funding.
  • Collaborative Seed Grants (examples)
  • Predicting Invasive Plant Species Occurrences A
    Process for Prioritizing Prevention in National
    Parks
  • Role of the 1,25D3-MARRS Protein in Nuclear
    Function
  • Sourcing the Origin of Stone Raw Materials from
    the 8,00 Year-Old Chance Gulch Archaeological
    Site, Gunnison Basin, CO
  • Gray Water Irrigation Constituent Uptake,
    Leaching, and Persistence
  • Focused Topics Effective
  • Coffees/socials to share research among
    colleagues in a department
  • Brown bag lunch with Vice Provost for Associate
    women profs re promotion to full
  • Collaborative seminars among colleagues or with
    guest speakers
  • General Socials Ineffective

13
3 Department Interventions
  • The ADVANCE departmental interventions work with
  • Select departments in the targeted colleges 
  • Working with the faculty in each department to
    identify ways to
  • improve the effectiveness of individuals
    and the department
  • Each intervention department has a control
    department for comparison to study the effects
    of intervention.
  • 2003 Interventions Control
    Department
  • Biology                                          
             Chemistry
  • Plant, Soils, Biometeorology                 
    Nutrition Food Science
  • 2004 Intervention Control
    Department
  • Biological Irrigation Engineering       Mechani
    cal Aerospace Engineering
  • 2005 Intervention
  • College of Natural Resources

14
Department Intervention Results
  • Speaker series and coffee/socials for sharing
    research improved collegiality
  • Department conflict resolution improved
    processes for decision-making
  • Transparency of procedures and funding improved
    communication
  • Collaborative research between junior and senior
    faculty bridging gaps between specializations
  • Targeted grant writing help for junior faculty
    helping ESL speakers and writers

15
Departmental Climate Survey (quality of work
life)
  • Significant differences between departments
    regarding
  • Quality of relationships among colleagues
  • Psychological safety
  • Pessimism about organizational change
  • Access to resources
  • Job satisfaction
  • Team learning behavior
  • Work/Personal life conflict
  • No significant differences in gender/rank across
    all colleges
  • Significant gender and rank differences for STEM

16
Gender Differences-STEM
17
Gender x Rank-STEM
18
Departmental Climate Survey Results
  • The STEM collegesGender/rank differences
    Because there are fewer than 20 women in these
    colleges, the climate survey discerned
    differences in gender and rank. Tenured women
    scored STEM departments the lowest on many
    climate measures.
  • The Dean of Education The problem dept. that
    scored at the very bottom of most of the scale
    measures had discussed the results of the survey
    and really wanted to change their dept. climate
    and had begun working on it.
  • The Dean of HASS Learned from the survey that
    the School of the Arts depts. were reporting very
    high work/personal life conflict.  Part of this
    is inherent to their jobs theater and concert
    performances in the evenings.  But the college
    was working with dept. heads to try to find ways
    to mitigate the stress and turnover that they
    were experiencing.
  • The Dean of Science Met with dept. heads and
    asked them about the climate survey was prepared
    to report what he had learned to the other deans.

19
4. USU ADVANCE Initiatives
  • Assessment
  • Climate surveys, phone interviews, focus groups,
    individual faculty interviews
  • Committee feedback, salary studies, space
    studies, data collection on recruitment and
    retention, assessing and modeling career factors
    and job satisfaction
  • The importance of good data for decision-making
    and for implementing change
  • Dissemination
  • ADVANCE website http//websites.usu.edu/advance
  • ADVANCE newsletter
  • Provosts webpage
  • Campus, State, Regional Events workshops,
    seminars, brown bags
  • National/Regional Conferences
  • Publications in national journals and magazines
  • Visibility
  • USU President and Provost support
  • Implementation Committee including deans, STEM
    department heads, and key faculty
  • Central campus location in the student center
  • Sustainability
  • Coordinating efforts with AA/EO, SPO, VP
    Research, Provosts office so programs will
    eventually reside in a permanent administrative
    structure.
  • Integration with Tri-Council for gender programs
    (Womens Center, Women Gender Research
    Institute, Women Gender Studies)
  • Permanent director of faculty womens issues as
    position in Provosts office
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com