Alexander the Great - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Alexander the Great

Description:

Alexander the Great's Art of Strategy: the Timeless Leadership lessons of ... The Great Men Theory by Thomas Carlyle, (1795-1881) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:626
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: fredrickch
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alexander the Great


1
  • Alexander the Great
  • Main References
  • Adams, W. L. Alexander the Great Legacy of a
    Conqueror. New York Longman, 2005.
  • Ashley, James R. The Macedonian Empire the Era
    of Warfare under Philip II and Alexander the
    Great, 359-323 B.C. Jefferson McFarland, 1998.
  • Bose, Partha. Alexander the Greats Art of
    Strategy the Timeless Leadership lessons of
    Historys Greatest Empire Builder. New York
    Gotham, 2003.

2
  • Bosworth, A.B. Conquest and Empire the Reign of
    Alexander the Great. Cambridge Cambridge U.
    Press, 1988.
  • ------------------. Alexander and the East the
    Tragedy of Triumph. Oxford Clarendon, 1998.
  • ------------------, et al., eds. Alexander the
    Great in Fact and Fiction. Oxford Oxford U.
    Press, 2000.
  • Carney, Elizabeth. Olympias Mother of Alexander
    the Great. New York Routledge, 2006.
  • Dahmen, Karsten. The Legend of Alexander the
    Great on Greek and Roman Coins. New York
    Routledge, 2007.

3
  • Fildes, Alan. Alexander the Great Son of the
    Gods. Los Angeles J. Paul Getty Museum, 2002.
  • Fox, Robin Lane. Alexander the Great. London
    Penguin, 1973.
  • Fraser, P.M. Cities of Alexander the Great.
    Oxford Clarendon, 1996.
  • Grainger, John D. Alexander the Great Failure
    the Collapse of the Macedonian Empire. London
    Hambledon, 2007.
  • Hammond, N.G.L. The Genius of Alexander the
    Great. Chapel Hill U. of North Carolina Press,
    1997.

4
  • Heckel, Waldemar. The Wars of Alexander the
    Great, 336-323 B.C. New York Routledge, 2003.
  • ----------------------. The Conquests of
    Alexander the Great. Cambridge Cambridge U.
    Press, 2008.
  • ----------------------. Whos Who in the Age of
    Alexander the Great Prosopography of Alexanders
    Empire. Oxford Blackwell, 2006.
  • ----------------------, et al., eds. Alexander
    the Great Historical Sources in Translation.
    Oxford Blackwell, 2004.
  • ----------------------, et al., eds. Alexanders
    Empire Formulation to Decay. Claremont Regina,
    2007.
  • Holt, Frank Lee. Alexander the Great and the
    Mystery of the Elephant Medallions.
  • Berkeley U. of California Press, 2003.

5
  • Kurke, Lance B. The Wisdom of Alexander the
    Great Enduring Leadership Lessons from the Man
    Who Created an Empire. New York American
    Management Association, 2004.
  • Lonsdale, David J. Alexander the Great Lessons
    in Strategy. New York Routledge, 2007.
  • Roisman, Joseph, ed. Alexander the Great
    Ancient and Modern Perspectives. Lexington,
    Mass. D.C.Heath, 1995.
  • -------------------------. Brills Companion to
    Alexander the Great. Leiden Brill, 2003.
  • Saunders, Nicholas. Alexanders Tomb the Two
    Thousand Year Obsession to Find the Lost
    Conqueror. New York Basic, 2006.

6
  • Skelton, Debra. Empire of Alexander the Great.
    New York Facts on File, 2005.
  • Stoneman, Richard. Alexander the Great a Life
    in Legend. New Haven Yale U. Press, 2008.
  • -----------------------. Alexander the Great.
    New York Rougledge, 1997.
  • Tarn, W.W. Alexander the Great. Vol. I
    Narrative Vol. II Sources and Studies.
    Cambridge Cambridge U. Press, 1948.
  • Thomas, Carol. Alexander the Great in His World.
    Malden, M.A. Blackwell, 2007.
  • Wood, Michael. In the Footsteps of Alexander the
    Great a Journey from Greece to Asia. Berkeley
    U. of California Press, 1997.
  • Worthington, Ian, ed. Alexander the Great a
    Reader. New York Routledge, 2003.

7
  • Heroes and Heroic Worship
  • The Great Men Theory by Thomas Carlyle,
    (1795-1881)
  • The history of mankind is but the biographies of
    great men.
  • (Cf. Tseng Kuo-fan)
  • Great men were just products of history (cf. Karl
    Marxs communist theory the historical current
    cannot be rejected)
  • Great men made history created new era
  • Perhaps, both sparkplug and fuel

8
  • Historical Background
  • Rise of Macedonia (in the far north)
  • 359 B.C. Philip (II) King of Macedonia, a
    brilliant soldier, a fine speaker, a man of much
    personal charm with wit, a tactful diplomat
    learnt some skill such as the phalanx from
    Thebes as hostage (as a young prince)
  • Athens, Sparta, and Thebes -- all tried but
    failed to dominating the Greek world -- now all
    worn out

9
  • The Macedonians were considered the northern
    barbarians
  • Philip said, Yes, we the Macedonians are crude
    people. We call a spade a spade. that is, not
    flowery
  • appeasement atmosphere among the Greek poleis.
  • Philip, d. 336 -- political assassination?
  • Queen Olympias

10
  • Alexander the Great, r. 336-323 B.C. (age 20 --
    33 d.) 13 years of reign
  • During his expedition to the east, two things
    were always with Alexander the Great
  • (1) Homers Iliad (Achilles was said to be
    Alexanders hero or idol), and
  • (2) A dagger under his pillow
  • Symbolized his passionate yet warlike
    nature/character

11
  • Similarities with Achilles, yet with wit, for
    instance, he used wit to tame a newly caught wild
    horse

12
  • The impetuous ambitions of Alexander the Great
  • 1. Charging across the river to fight the Persian
    army without his own main army to back up
  • 2. Whenever he heard Philip, his father, had
    taken any town of importance, or won any
    significant victory instead of rejoicing at it
    altogether, he would tell his companions that his
    father would anticipate everything, and leave him
    and them no opportunities of performing great
    illustrious actions.

13
  • Alexanders conquest of Persia (334-332 B.C.)
  • In 333 B.C., after Alexander defeated the Persian
    army in a battle, the Persian king sent an envoy
    to ask for peace, giving Alexander half of the
    empire his only daughter, the heiress/princess
    to be wife of Alexander yet, when Alexander
    read the letter to his council, his general
    Parmenio said that if he were Alexander, he would
    accept. So would I, replied Alexander, if I
    were you Parmenio, and rejected the
    compromise.

14
  • In 332 B.C., Alexander took Egypt, and was
    greeted as the son of Zeus (that is, a living
    god), and built Alexandria.
  • 330 B.C. invaded Afghanistan
  • 327 B.C. invaded India (war elephant)
  • 323 B.C. (June 10) on his return trip, died of
    swamp fever in Babylon

15
  • Arguments
  • Negative Alexander the Great might have caused
    the decline and fall of the Greek polis -- by
    exhausting the energy of Greece and his
    foundation (military power and troops) might have
    been laid by his father, Philip II of Macedon.
  • Positive On the other hand, Alexander
    definitely witnessed the rise of Macedonia, and
    he has started the idea of cosmopolitanism, and
    the Hellenistic cf. Hellenic Age.

16
  • Negative Alexander the Great was opposite to
    Aristotle, his mentor. Aristotle loved the polis
    to be small, but Alexander built a big empire.
    Aristotle preferred the cultured Greek to rule
    over the foreigners, but Alexanders satrapy was
    highly autonomous with foreigners ruling.
  • Neutral Arrian, a Roman historian, thought
    that Alexander the Great was a warrior king, and
    his military achievements were great. But Arrian
    thought that Alexanders eastern expedition was
    wrong, which got the eastern problems instead.

17
  • On the other hand, Plutarch, another Roman
    historian, believed that there were two broader
    meanings in Alexanders eastern expedition 1.
    Alexander the Great was a philosopher-king 2.
    The goals for expedition made Alexander a
    philosopher -- that he was not for his own
    luxurious glory or wealth, but for the peaceful
    cosmopolitan society of human beings.

18
  • Negative 20th century historians A.R. Burn, E.
    Badian, and Ulrich Wilcken believed that
    Alexander did not aim at cosmopolitanism. He was
    only an ambitious adventurer.
  • Positive On the contrary, W.W. Tarn and J.F.C.
    Fuller believed that Alexander the Great was a
    philosopher-king, and he was an ideal believer in
    cosmopolitanism.

19
  • Alexander as a traitor
  • Alexander destroyed the small polis
  • Alexanders aim in the eastern Expedition was
    ambitious, impetuous, adventurous
  • Consequence mutually affected with the east, but
    to some historians, the highly cultured Greeks
    were barbarized

20
  • Alexander as an innovator
  • Alexander united Greece and created an
    unprecedented empire (over 3 continents), and
    started the Hellenistic Age
  • Alexanders aim was related to the
    philosopher-king ideal, cosmopolitanism, and
    necessity
  • Hellenized the world, that is why Greek history
    was from Hellenic to Hellenistic then

21
  • Significance
  • Positive
  • 1. Created a big empire ruling over 3 continents
  • 2. A break-through in the idea of cosmopolitanism
    (including the satrapy, etc.), at least, it was a
    kind of fusion
  • 3. Greek influence over the east (all the way to
    India his coins were found in India), thus,
    Hellenistic
  • 4. According to W.W. Tarn, Alexander the Great
    was a contributor or promoter of the unity of
    mankind

22
  • Negative
  • 1. Even though he won on horseback by
    conquests, he could not rule the empire for long
    soon he died, and his empire scattered
  • 2. Alexander by draining off so much Greek
    man-power so far into the east, Alexander
    weakened Greece, and ultimately even Greek
    resistance at home to Roman aggression later
  • 3. Alexander destroyed the spirit (small,
    exclusive, oneness, etc.) of the polis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com