La ricerca nello scompenso cardiaco acuto: ci sono reali novit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

La ricerca nello scompenso cardiaco acuto: ci sono reali novit

Description:

La ricerca nello scompenso cardiaco acuto: ci sono reali novit ? Aldo P Maggioni ... L'epidemiologia dello scompenso acuto rimane un problema rilevante senza segni ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:206
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: malika
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: La ricerca nello scompenso cardiaco acuto: ci sono reali novit


1
La ricerca nello scompenso cardiaco acuto ci
sono reali novità?
Aldo P Maggioni Centro Studi ANMCO Firenze
2
Lepidemiologia dello scompenso acuto rimane un
problema rilevante senza segni di miglioramento
nel tempo
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
AHF vs CHF outcomes
Lee DS, Am. J. Med. 2004
8
La ricerca sui trattamenti dello scompenso
cardiaco acuto
  • Fallimenti
  • Semidelusioni
  • Piccoli successi

9
Sopravvivenza dei farmaci per lo S.C. grave
Xamoterolo
Milrinone
(PROMISE)
Vesnarinone
(VEST)
Ibopamina
(PRIME-2)
Pimobendan
Epoprostenol
(First)
Bosentan
(REACH-1)
10
La ricerca sui trattamenti dello scompenso
cardiaco acuto
  • Fallimenti
  • Semidelusioni

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
A. Mebazaa et al., JAMA 2007, 297 1883-1891
14
BNP
A. Mebazaa et al., JAMA 2007, 297 1883-1891
A. Mebazaa et al., JAMA 2007, 297 1883-1891
15
A. Mebazaa et al., JAMA 2007, 297 1883-1891
A. Mebazaa et al., JAMA 2007, 297 1883-1891
16
La ricerca sui trattamenti dello scompenso
cardiaco acuto
  • Fallimenti
  • Semidelusioni
  • Piccoli successi

17
(No Transcript)
18
M.A. Konstam et al., JAMA 2007, 297 1319-1331
19
M.A. Konstam et al., JAMA 2007, 297 1319-1331
20
  • Per cominciare a ragionare più seriamente
  • E possibile fare una stratificazione dei rischi
    affidabile ?

21
(No Transcript)
22
EHS HF II data collection
  • Patients screened at the emergency area,
    including cardiac care unit (CCU) or intensive
    care unit (ICU), as well as on ward facilities
    (internal medicine or cardiology)
  • 133 participating hospitals
  • university hospitals (47)
  • community or district hospitals (49)
  • private clinics (4)
  • 30 European countries
  • Recruitment from 21 October 2004 until 31 August
    2005

23
EHFS II All-Cause in-Hospital Mortality
39.6
6.6
5.3
5.4
n. 3580 pts
n. 139 pts
n. 2202 pts
n. 1239 pts
24
Univariate analysis in-hospital mortality by
age, SBP and creatinine at hospital entry
12.9
(n. 3441 patients)
10.8
9.3
6.4
5.7
5.1
3.4
3.4
3.0
lt65
65-80
gt80
gt130
110-130
lt110
lt1.4
1.4-2.0
gt2.0
25
(No Transcript)
26
EHFS II All-cause in-hospital mortality by
strata of risk score
Risk score
743
772
726
574
305
321
N. of pts
27
  • Per cominciare a ragionare più seriamente
  • E possibile fare una stratificazione dei rischi
    affidabile ?
  • Quali end-point e a quali tempi dobbiamo
    misurarli ?

28
All-cause mortality The lessons learned from
trials and registries...
Chronic HF
ACS
Acute HF
Opasich C et al. for the IN-CHF Investigators. Am
J Cardiol 2000 86 353-357 GISSI-3 Six-month
data. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996 27 337-344
Tavazzi L et al. The Italian survey on Acute
Heart Failure. Eur Heart J 2006 27 1207-1215
29
Research in acute HF Conclusions
  • Morbidity and mortality of patients with acute HF
    remain unacceptably high
  • Treatment of acute HF continues to remain largely
    anecdotal without much progress in the last
    decades
  • Risk stratification with the identification of
    simple clinical variables seems to be feasible in
    any clinical setting
  • In any case, the application of risk scores in
    the real world of acute HF could be limited by
  • The heterogeneity of this clinical condition
  • The different patho-physiological background
  • The various clinical settings (and doctor
    profiles) in which patients with AHF are managed
  • Further efforts should be focused on planning
    research in the field of AHF

30
What do we need ?
  • Data on the clinical characteristics.
  • Definition, sub-clasification (ST?/non-ST ?)
  • Data on the exact pathophysiology of each
    subtype.
  • Better ways to risk-stratify the patients.
  • Treatments to
  • Reduce Mortality
  • Reduce Morbidity (worsening heart failure?)
  • Rapid and safe symptoms relief
  • Or in other words everything

31
Comparison of decompensated heart failure with
acute myocardial infarction
Decompensated Acute myocardial
Heart failure
infarction Hospitalization per year(in US) ?
1,000,000 ? 1,000,000 In-Hospital
Mortality 3-12 3-7 Readmission rate (60
days) 35 10 Guidelines for risk
stratification No Yes Guidelines for
therapy Yes (ESC) Yes No
(AHA/ACC) Largest randomized trial 4,133 41,021
MEDLINE citations (1965-2006) 472 33,908
Modified from Am Heart J 2003 145 S18-25
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com