Implementing a Private Sector Arrangement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Implementing a Private Sector Arrangement

Description:

ensuring the unit has sufficient autonomy to do its job ... should be structured with an eye to incentives ... there's no magic in the bidding process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: world72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementing a Private Sector Arrangement


1
Implementing a Private Sector Arrangement
Penelope Brook The World Bank
1
2
Managing the Process Institutions
  • To implement a reform process, a responsible unit
    must be established.
  • Key issues
  • ensuring the unit has sufficient autonomy to do
    its job effectively
  • shielding staff from day-to-day political
    interference
  • making the unit accountable for its performance

2
3
Hiring and Managing Advisers
  • Much of the relevant work will likely need to be
    contracted out
  • Categories of advice
  • economic and regulatory
  • legal
  • technical
  • environmental
  • investment banking / financial
  • human relations
  • public relations

3
4
Getting What You Want from Advisers
  • Adviser contracts should be structured with an
    eye to incentives
  • e.g., if investment banker receives a success
    fee, you may want a separate contract for
    regulatory advice
  • The process is likely to be an interactive one -
    and theres no substitute for good management on
    the government side

4
5
Implementing a TransactionObjectives
  • 1st Order
  • find a suitable partner
  • conclude a sustainable transaction
  • 2nd Order
  • competitiveness
  • transparency
  • political sustainability

5
6
Basic Decision Parameters
  • pre qualification
  • bid design
  • bid process
  • framework for the ongoing relationship

6
7
Prequalification
  • Objectives
  • identify serious, capable bidders
  • keep the pool of bidders manageable
  • Issues
  • how much, and what kind, of experience is
    required?
  • how to ensure competition?
  • how to encourage bids, if costs are high?

7
8
Pre-qualification Common Issues
  • If there arent strong existing local candidates,
    how can you structure prequalification to help
    build a domestic industry over time?
  • If the market seems small, what are the options
    for broadening the field?

8
9
Bid Design
  • Objective
  • to find a way of eliciting the information most
    relevant to the choice of partner
  • Issues
  • simplest if reduced to a single, quantifiable
    variable, but, in practice, complicated by
    incomplete information
  • trade-off between the richness of offers and the
    transparency of competition

9
10
Bid Design OptionsThe Technical Envelope
  • Selected Options
  • technical bid is like prequalification winner
    chosen on financial bid alone
  • technical proposals may pass or fail winner
    chosen from those who pass, on basis of financial
    bid
  • technical proposals are scored, and weighted
    together with financial proposals

10
11
Bid Design OptionsThe Financial Envelope
  • Selected Options
  • bids are based on the price of shares / assets
    being sold
  • bids are based on an up-front payment combined
    with future concession fees
  • bids are based on a future tariff
  • bids are for a service fee, with some kind of
    incentive component

11
12
Example Commuter Rail Concessions in Argentina
  • Government thought that commuter rail might need
    subsidies for operation, rehabilitation and
    investment
  • Government identified the type and amount of
    investments required for each line
  • Concessions were awarded to the bidder requiring
    the lowest subsidy to operate the line and do the
    required rehabilitation and investments

12
13
The Bid Process
  • Objective
  • to select a suitable partner, at the best price
    (effective competition for the market)
  • Options
  • competitive bid
  • competitive negotiations
  • direct negotiations

13
14
Competitive Bid
  • Pros
  • market mechanism for choosing the best proposal
  • relatively transparent
  • Cons
  • works best if outputs can be standardized, and
    all parameters are pre-specified
  • may encourage under-bidding if renegotiation is
    possible later

14
15
Competitive Negotiations
  • Pros
  • permits more creativity and innovation in bids
  • reduces incentive to under-bid
  • offers a richer means of screening bidders than
    price alone
  • Cons
  • competition is less transparent
  • bids can be difficult to compare

15
16
Direct Negotiations
  • Pros
  • incentives to provide innovative solutions to
    local problems
  • may be attractive where the costs of bidding are
    high relative to expected revenues
  • Cons
  • lacks transparency reduces incentives for cost
    effectiveness
  • may undermine political sustainability

16
17
In Practice...
  • Most processes involve some combination of
    pre-bid discussions with potential bidders,
    competitive bidding and negotiation
  • Whatever the process, post-transaction revisions
    are hard to avoid
  • so careful attention is needed to how the
    contract shapes incentives and processes for
    revision

17
18
Preparing for the Ongoing Relationship
  • The bid is only a first step towards a 10-, 25-
    or 30-year relationship
  • theres no magic in the bidding process
  • Need tools to
  • maintain the spirit of the initial agreement (on
    both sides!)
  • maintain competitive pressures on the private
    partner

18
19
Key Elements
  • Promotion of competition, as far as possible
  • Effective, credible regulatory arrangements
  • Contractual provisions for dealing with
    unpredictable events

19
20
Options for Introducing Competition
  • Competitive pressures can be introduced even in
    network industries
  • by allowing new entrants to supply consumers
  • by having a competition for the job of running a
    utility
  • by creating benchmarks for comparing the
    performance of different utilities

20
21
Allowing Entry May be the Best Way of Getting
Services to the Poor
  • Low-income households often lack water and
    sewerage connections
  • Even under a very good contract, progress in
    getting formal connections to these households
    may be slow
  • Allowing competition from micro-enterprises and
    community groups to serve these households may
    result in lower cost solutions and faster
    connections

21
22
The Role of Regulation
  • The role of regulators is to
  • protect consumers from monopoly abuses
  • protect investors from arbitrary political action
  • provide incentives for efficiency
  • minimize costs of regulatory interventions

22
23
Regulatory Independence is Key
23
24
What Regulators Do
  • regulation and adjustment of prices
  • monitoring service and quality standards
  • monitoring competition
  • facilitating settlement of disputes
  • the precise role of regulators varies according
    to the kind of private sector contract

24
25
Designing Regulation
  • Early in the reform process, careful thought
    needs to be given to regulatory design, for
    example
  • how much discretion should regulators have?
  • how can regulators be made at once independent
    and accountable?
  • should regulation be at the municipal level or a
    more centralized level?

25
26
Options Where Regulatory Capacity is Limited
  • In many developing country cities, regulatory
    skills are in short supply, and there is no
    (good) regulatory track-record
  • In these cases, it may be desirable to
  • contract out some regulatory functions to private
    consultants
  • limit regulatory discretion, and pay special
    attention to the rules on how it will be applied

26
27
Example Contracting out Regulatory Functions
  • Much of the work of regulators involves data
    gathering and processing
  • By contracting out this work, the regulator may
  • gain access to scarce technical skills
  • benefit from the credibility of the private
    contractor
  • benefit from the transfer of skills from the
    private contractor

27
28
Provision for Unforeseen Events
  • All contracts are based on incomplete
    information, both about the current state of the
    utility and consumer needs, and about what will
    happen in the future
  • Careful provisions are therefore needed for
    adjusting contractual terms over the life of the
    contract

28
29
Critical Elements to Specify
  • The conditions under which contractual terms may
    be changed
  • Which kinds of change will necessitate
    renegotiation of the contract
  • The process by which renegotiation must be
    initiated and conducted
  • The procedures to be followed when the parties
    cannot agree on how to resolve an issue

29
30
Implementation Key Issues
  • A well-prepared contract is an essential first
    step towards a good public - private sector
    partnership
  • Preparation needs to focus not only on the
    contract, but on promoting competition and
    developing regulatory structures
  • Clarity and transparency in implementing a
    transaction are critical

30
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com