Title: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: THE ROLE OF THE NED
1- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE THE ROLE OF THE NED
- Improving Professionalism, Training Support
- Mark V. Jarvis, Partner Corporate Finance
-
2Thinking Globally
- What do investors consider when investing?
3McKinsey Study
- McKinsey 2000 survey showed global investors
would pay 18 premium for a well governed company - The new survey (2001)
- "highlights that the emerging market corporate
governance model is markedly different than that
which prevails in the US and UK. Any transition
from the former to the latter requires
substantial reform not only at the corporate
level but also at the institutional level. The
complexity of this transition has for too long
been underestimated."
4McKinsey suggests two areas in need of greater
emphasis
- Complementary governance improvements at the
corporate level (enhanced disclosure, better
board practice etc) with institutional reforms at
the market level. - Improving the efficiency of equity and private
equity markets provides more external financing
options for local businesses, as does improving
linkages with global capital hubs, and improving
the legal and regulatory environment for doing
business. - Focus on family / related party owned businesses.
"Without incentives to change, they could
continue to act a major obstacle to reform." - Hangover for Mass Privatisation period
5Importance of institutional factors when
selecting Emerging Markets
6Factors when selecting Emerging Market companies
for investment
7Independent Non-Executive Directors
8Role of Non-Executive Directors
- Strategic direction a theme that recurs
throughout research findings - Monitoring and supervising is generally regarded
as important - Non-executive directors perceive themselves more
as providers of strategic direction and less as
suppliers of knowledge and contacts. - Type of knowledge other industries (39),
companys industry (29) specialist knowledge
(27). - While the most important contacts were industry
related (63), city related (20) and politically
related (13).
9How can a non-executive director add value?
- Effective NEDs can optimise board performance,
making the company attractive not only to its
current shareholders but also to future
investors. - They should actively contribute to the success of
an enterprise by - Bringing knowledge and experience to the board,
whether in the context of the business itself or
on matters such as international markets,
technology or public affairs. - Applying a broad, objective view of the company
and its markets to the development and evaluation
of business strategy. - Supporting the executive team, while maintaining
independence and objectivity, and ensuring the
adoption of corporate governance best practice.
10Cadbury Report 1992 - NEDs
- Non-executive directors should bring an
independent judgement on issues of strategy,
performance, resources, including key
appointments, and standards of conduct. - The majority should be independent of management
and free from any business or other relationship
which could materially interfere with the
exercise of their independent judgement. apart
from their fees and shareholding. Their fees
should reflect the time which they commit to the
company. - Non-executive directors should be appointed for
specified terms and reappointment should not be
automatic. - Non-executive directors should be selected
through a formal process and both this process
and their appointment should be a matter for the
board as a whole.
11The Contribution of Non-Executive Directors as
viewed by Non-Executive Executive Directors
Strategic Direction
Independence
Catalyst
Supervising/Monitoring
Mentor
Personal Qualities
Knowledge
Contacts
12SUMMARY OF RESEARCH FINDINGSNOP NON-EXECUTIVE /
EXECUTIVE STUDY
- Non-executive directors tend to be very
experienced with 42 having over 20 years of
directorial experience - 3 main attributes non-executive directors brought
to the board Strategic Direction, Independence
Knowledge - Knowledge Management, E-Commerce Globalisation
identified as key opportunities for growth - Conversely Government Regulations were seen as a
substantial threat to the future success of
businesses - Around 60 of boards within the sample had
non-executive directors
13Growth Opportunities Threats
- Interesting to see where growth opportunities are
and where threats are perceived
14Threats Opportunities to success
Opportunities
Threats
KnowledgeManagement
Globalisation
E-Commerce
Environmental Issues
GovernmentRegulations
WorkforceChanges
15Main Threats and Opportunities
- Executive and non-executive directors - biggest
worry was seen as government regulations, - around half of both categories felt that they
were a potential threat - Others were workforce changes environmental
issues - Knowledge Management was perceived by both type
of directors to provide the greatest opportunity
for future growth. - E-commerce and Globalisation were the other major
opportunities cited
16Market Driven Reforms develop Corporate
Governance not Enforcement
- Proven to be more effective
- Russian SEC (FCSM) will not make Corporate
Governance Code legislation - Over regulation is detrimental to development
- Board level development is key and NEDs are a
key element in developing Corporate Governance
and Market Perception
17NEDs at All Levels
- In the UK independent NEDs are seen at companies
at all levels - In Russia practice has only been seen at Blue
Chip Level - Beginning to see interest SMEs
18ACCA Research Report - Berry Perren 2000 - SMEs
- There is a high level of awareness of NEDs
- Only 5 of respondents stated that they were
unaware of the existence of NEDs. - There is some mistrust of the NED role (for
example, disruption of directorial team, breaches
of privacy, loss of control and freedom) - only 2 felt that NEDs had actually harmed their
company - 80 of managing directors (MDs) who had NEDs felt
that they were helpful. - The majority of SMEs do not have NEDs
- NEDs within SMEs is directly related to the size
of the company with 20 of companies with lt50
employees, having NEDs. - As companies get larger they are more likely to
have NEDs nearly 50 with 200499 employees hav3
NEDs.
19ACCA Research Report - Berry Perren 2000 -
SMEs (cont)
- NEDs spend on average 18 days per year on their
SMEs business - Managing directors called upon a broad range of
business advice and mentorship - Favourite mentors with managing directors were
fellow directors, outside accountants, their
spouses, bank managers and business friends - When a managing director had access to an NED
then they ranked near the very top of mentors
just below other inside directors
20Why do Russia companies need Independent Directors
21PROMOTION OF INVESTORS REPS TO RUSSIAN BOARDS
- Lack of truly independent directors represents
- a significant obstacle to the investment
attractiveness of Russian issuers - creates room for violations of rights and
infringement legitimate interests of investors
and shareholders. - To improve corporate governance investors have
promoted independent directors to boards of
Russian issuers. - IPA helped investor representatives were elected
at AGMs in 2001 to Boards of Directors of 39
leading Russian companies. - The number of independent representatives in BoDs
of Russian enterprises grew 60 as compared to
last year results.
22Issuers with Independent Directors
- Energy companies
- Amurenergo, Volgogradenergo, Voronezhenergo,
Kalugaenergo, Krasnoyarskenergo, Kubanenergo
Kurskenergo, Lenenergo, Magadanenergo, Mosenergo,
Nizhnovenergo, Permenergo, RAO "UES of Russia",
Rostovenergo, Saratovenergo, Tambovenergo,
Tverenergo - Telecom companies
- Vladimirsviaz, Kirovelectrosviaz,
Krasnoyarskelectrosviaz, Kubanelectrosviaz, MGTS,
Novgorodtelecom, PTS, Rostelecom,
Smolensksviazinform, Uraltelecom,
Chelyabinsksviazinform, Electrosviaz (Moscow
region) - Oil and Gaz
- Gazprom, Sibneft
- Machinery-building companies
- Aviastar, Kazan Helicopter Plant, United Heavy
Machinery - Other industries
- Alfacement, GUM, Krasny Octyabr, Petrovsky Passage
23Independent Director Programme
- Russia
- www.independentdirector.ru
24EY and IPA Launch Russia Indpendent Director
Programme
- The best non-executive independent directors
have a breadth of view that complements the
necessary focus of executive directors involved
in the day-to-day running of the business. They
are experienced, prepared to challenge the
accepted wisdom,and today, (2 October 2001) Ernst
Young and the IPA launch this programme to
develop these ideals in Russia. - The is intended to promote wide understanding of
the role and contribution of independent
non-executive directors through a programme of
targeted events, publications and electronic
media. - Independent directors are becoming a recognised
and important tool in Russia at the level of the
Boards of Directors' and gradually becoming
incorporated into Russian business practice.
25Independent Director Programme - Moscow
- The Independent Director Programme established
this 2nd October 2001 by EY and the IPA - The Independent Director Programme will initiate
a programme of workshops, surveys, seminars,and
publications to assist non-executive independent
directors to keep abreast of good practice. - In the UK Ernst Young established The
Independent Director - a joint initiative with
the UK Institute of Directors aimed at developing
and supporting the role of Independent
Non-Executive Directors. - The issues surrounding the increased role of
Boards of Directors in companies and the
maintenance of high professional standards are of
concern for both the business community and State
authorities. - Institutes of independent directors have been
established and proven in international countries
and have become one of the key elements in
building good corporate governance
26Not that easy..
27Barriers for Independent Directors
- Not really ready to pay for NEDs
- Are Boards a real body or puppets
- Legal right to have Board Meetings
28Barriers for Independent Directors
- Not really ready to pay for NEDs
- Are Boards a real body or puppets
- Legal right to have Board Meetings
29Non-Executive pay
- Survey of non-executive director practice and
fees by the Monks Partnership considered pay and
practice of non-executive directors and chairmen.
- The survey reveals a significant increase in fees
for most non-executive directors and increasing
use of payment in shares. - The findings also highlighted the fact that
organisations are requiring greater time
commitment from their non-executive directors. - The most common activities undertaken, in
addition to the AGM, board and committee
meetings, are site visits and strategy meetings. - Most post holders have additional commitments
over and above board and committee meetings.
30Non-Executive pay
- Russian companies not really ready to pay
- Data base of candidates poor (EY and Ward Howell
developing this) - Language often a barrier
31Barriers for Independent Directors
- Not really ready to pay for NEDs
- Are Boards a real body or puppets
- Legal right to have Board Meetings
32Are Boards a real body or a puppet?
- Boards are not a real executive body in many
cases and remain puppets of the majority
shareholders
33Barriers for Independent Directors
- Not really ready to pay for NEDs
- Are Boards a real body or puppets
- Legal right to have Board Meetings
34Legal Developments in Russia
- The Supreme Arbitration Court has upheld an
appeal by the Russian Union of Industrialists and
Entrepreneurs (RSPP) to stop the practice whereby
a court bans a shareholder meeting pending the
hearing of a legal claim - On October 10 the higher court condemned the
practice of using such preventive measures as
violating the constitutional rights of
shareholders. - There have been many instances over the past few
months of courts canceling shareholder meetings
without an actual ruling being made such as
Novosibirskenergo and later the NTV television
channel. - Mosenergo is the latest such instancein the
fortnight preceding the September 1 EGM, the
company received 16 court rulings,each
superseding the previous.
35Progress will come
- Lets Work !! Every blow with the hammer helps
the Country