Title: Printing High Quality Microarrays
1Printing High Quality Microarrays
- Todd Martinsky
- todd_at_arrayit.com
- http//arrayit.com
2Outline
- Company background
- In the media
- Key personnel
- Established credibility
- Making the perfect microarray
- Its really a science, not an art
- Keys 1 through 5
- Conclusions
3- Privately held company
- Financially strong and profitable
- Fastest Growing Biotech in the America
- Microarray Technologies
- First company to create microarray products
- Superior technical expertise
- Recognized Leader in the field
- 10 year anniversary Nov. 1, 2003
4- Developed First Micro Spotting Pins for
Microarray Manufacturing - -Intellectual property from 1997
- Most Widely used Microarray Technology in the
world Patent 6101946 - World leader in microarray consumables
- - Glass substrates, Pins, Hybridization
cassettes, spotting solutions, sample prep kits,
etc.
5Award Winning Service Quality
Silver Medal From DOD
6- Largest Circulationin the United States.
- 12 Companies mentioned
- 2 mentioned twice
- TeleChem Affymetrix
7Featured on NOVA
8How We Develop Products
Combine engineering principles with biological
expertise (Parallel Gene Analysis Methodology) to
systematically develop microarray products and
services.
9- Parallel Gene Analysis Methodology
- What you need to do and why, to complete the
microarray lifecycle. - Keep in simple, dont over-engineer
- Complicated systems and schemes break down and
are typically expensive - Critical thinking
- Customer Feedback
- End Result products, methods protocols
- Derived from our integrated In-House engineering
and biology expertise - Who are these people?
10In House Engineering Expertise
- Richard Martinsky Director of Engineering
- Designed Invented
- Hybridization Cassette
- Microarray Wash Station
- Stealth Chipmaker Micro Spotting Devices
- Process Engineering
- Substrate manufacturing
- Microarray Manufacturing
- Wash/Dry stations for Pins
- Microarray Scanners
- Microarray Robotics
11In House Microarray Expertise
- Mark Schena, Ph.D., Visiting Scholar
- Entire Microarray Industry based on first paper
- - Schena et al. Science. 270467. 1995.
- Editor of books on microarray Technology
- - (Oxford University Press, Biotechniques
publishers) - Wrote the textbook on microarrays
- - (Wiley Sons, Largest publisher of textbooks
in the world) - Recognized World Expert on Microarray Technology
12More Expertise
- Robin L. Stears, Ph.D.
- Senior Scientist/Director of Microarray
Technology - Utilized First commercially available microarryer
Scanner -1997 (Laboratory of Dr. S. Gullans,
Harvard Medical School) - Developed Genisphere 3DNA microarray detection
method (Stears et. Al, Physiological Genomics,
2000) - Head of Transcriptional Profiling Team,
Affymetrix platform, Aventis Pharmaceuticals
(2000-2001, Cambridge Genomics Center, MA)
13Thats me there
- Recognized leader with technological innovation,
intellectual property - Top names in the field-
- Mark Schena, Ph.D
- Robin L. Stears, Ph.D.
- Creating turn-key solutions for DNA Microarrays
since 1996 (ArrayIt? Brand Products)
14Protocols on the web arrayit.com
15Making the Perfect Microarray
Our golden rule, If there is a variable in
your system, control it.
16This information is based on 8 years experience
providing technical support for microarray
manufacturing.
17Key Factors to Control
- Micro fluidic printing technology
- Robotics (including wash/dry station)
- Sample preparation
- Surface chemistry
- Environment
- If youve got a quality problem, I can guarantee
its in 1 of these 5 areas.
18Printing High Quality Protein Microarrays
We should appreciate the fact that 1 picoliter is
to 1 liter as 1 cm is to 13 round-trips to the
moon!
19Our 12 Rules..being published later this year by
Kluwer
The Methodology of Printing Technologies
The principles that determine how spotting
technologies are used and interpreted. What
you need to do and why.
TeleChem/ArrayIt.com
2012 rules continued
1. Print uniform spots measured in
microns 2. Print individual spots in regular
array patterns that can be tracked by computer 3.
Easy to implement 4. Cost effective/affordable 5.Â
Print without damaging the sample or surface
chemistry 6. Saturate the immobilization surface
chemistry at each spot location
2112 rules continued
- 7. Amenable to high and low density
- 8. Change spot sizes and sample volumes easily
- 9. Load and deliver a specific amount of sample
each time - 10. Easy to fix and maintain, with no special
tooling or tech visits required - 11. Compatible with a variety of scientific
applications - 12. Print multiple samples, multiple times on
multiple substrates with one low volume loading
of sample
22Two Main Types
Consider the efficient use of sample when making
your choice! Contact Best for high numbers of
samples over many substrates Non-contact Low
numbers of samples over many, many substrates
23Non-Contact Types
Perkin Elmer others
24Non-Contact Types
To my knowledge, not used commercially Very high
heating of the sample makes it problematic Diffic
ult to change samples
25Non-Contact Types
Best for low numbers of samples and high numbers
of spots. Well made ceramic tips Different tips
for different spot sizes and volumes
26Non-Contact Types
Change delivery volume by firing multiple times
in the same spot location Spot size on par with
Pin spotting Typically slower than Pin spotting
since commercial systems are limited to 4-8
delivery nozzles Glass capillaries
Perkin Elmer Type
27Non Contact
IMITs TopSpot Uses an Piezo actuator and micro
fluidic channels. Industrial level manufacturing
of the same array
28Contact Printing Pin Ring
Advantages Multiple prints with 1
load Consistent and reliable Disadvantages Fixed
number of Pins (4) Large uptake volume Low
delivery vol. per spot Spring Loaded Pins No
flexibility to change spot size Complex actuators
not easy to fix (heat up during long runs) Large
source plate vol. 96 well plates No longer
supported by Affymetrix
What sticks to the tip of the pin as it passes
through the ring defines the amount of sample
delivered
29Split Pins and Quills
Advantages Multiple prints with 1 low volume of
load Patent owned by Incyte, but not
commercialized by them Flexible to change of
pins used only Can be replaced by user
Disadvantages Spring loaded (force on tips)
Tapping force to expel sample wears them out
quickly / variable deposition of sample Tip
tolerances uneven (ref., Brown patent) No
flexibility to change spot size Mistakes are
expensive
Split Pins (Many)
Tweezers / Quills (Schena et al.,1995)
- Variable sample uptake
- Forms a meniscus
- Tapping expels sample
30Patented Micro Spotting Pins by TeleChem
Advantages Multiple consistent prints with 1 low
vol. load Patented and commercialized by the same
organization with compatible consumables Flexible
to change of pins and spot size Easy to fix
Widely used Tight tolerances and quality
control Durable (under the right motion
parameters) Low volume of sample in source plate
(96 384 well)
Micro Spotting Pins
- Defined sample uptake (0.25, 0.6 or 1.25 ul)
- Sample at end of flat tip
- Substrate pulls off drop
31Stealth Micro Spotting Device Sub-nanoliter Vol.
Dispensing
PTO 6,101,946 Digitally controlled manufacturing
355X
32Spotting Sequence
33 2 Micron Tolerance
Mechanically identical parts perform identical
tasks
34Typical Results
Spot 1
Spot 200
Cy3 Labeled oligo in Micro Spotting
Solution-1 equal spot sizes, equal signal
intensities
ArrayIt? Stealth 3 Pin
35Analysis of Typical Results
NoteWhen the key elements 1-5 are controlled
properly
36Printing High Quality Protein Microarrays
37Contaminates in spotted sample
- Prohibit samples from immobilizing on the
microarray printing services - Prohibit interaction between array elements and
probes - Cause background noise
- Can clog pins and other printing mechanisms
- Ruin spot morphology
38PCR PurificationMembrane vs. ETOH Precipitation
Data
39PCR and Fluorescent Probe Purification
40Spotting Buffer
Qualities of a good spotting buffer
- Print even, small, round spots
- Disperses the sample evenly within the spot
- Promote sample binding to the array surface
- Retard evaporation within the source plates
- Dry evenly, perhaps not dry at all
- Wash away easily
- Optimize attachment
- Dry down and re-suspend
- Visual after spotting regardless of surface
- Stabilize sample for long term storage
41Microplates and Samples
- 384 round wells, not 96 wells
- better for avoiding evaporation
- Rigid polypropylene construction
- V or U bottom shaped wells
- 3-15 microliters of sample per well
U U
Sample
Polypropylene
Polystyrene
Does not bind DNA
Binds DNA
42Making the Perfect Microarray
43A good microarrayer has
- Accuracy and repeatability on the micron level
- Computer controlled GUI for easy programming and
sample tracking - Good wash/dry station between sample changes to
eliminate cross contamination between samples - Humidity and temperature control in a closed
cleanroom level positive pressure environment
44A good example
Self contained environmental (humidity)
controlled chamber to clean room level quality
dynamicdevices Oasis
TeleChem/ArrayIt.com
45Avoiding Sample Carryover
Use multiple wash/dry cycles, never dry the
printing mechanism until the last wash cycle is
complete!
Is the job of the wash/dry station on the
microarrayer
46Minimum Software Requirements
- Number of sample delivery mechanisms and the
center-to-center spacing of said mechanisms
(4.5mm or 9mm centers). - The total number of samples to be printed
- Offsets relative to the substrate
- Number of replicates of each sample
- Center-to-center distance between spots
- Number of columns and rows
- Number of substrates/slides to be printed
- Wash/dry parameters for the printing mechanisms
between printing cycles. - Mapping!!!!!
47Easy Programming Example
48 Personal Microarray System
1000 samples every 2 hours over 14 substrates
may be high enough throughput?
49Making the Perfect Microarray
503D (absorption) vs. 2D (covalent) Surfacesin
general
- Advantages of 3D (membranes, filters gels)
- High binding capacity (absorption)
- Compatible with fluorescent, chemiluminescent,
colorimetric, radioactive detection - Longer history of use (comfort level for users)
- Less expensive labeling reagents and reading
equipment (colorimetric)
14µm thick nitrocellulose-based coating. Electron
micrograph image above, the uniform pore
structure provides a large, 3-dimensional surface
area for protein binding. The 3-dimensional
surface quantitatively binds arrayed
proteins www.schleicher-schuell.com
513D (absorption) vs. 2D (covalent) Surfacesin
general
- Advantages of 2D
- Better defined spot morphology(no diffusion)
- Inherent lower background fluorescence (glass)
- High specificity
- Non-porous surface (no place to trap any
contaminate in processing) - Covalent and/or specific binding for more
stringent processing conditions
52- Homogenous distribution of capture reactive
groups across the entire surface is critical for
attaching the same amount of sample at each array
location - The printing mechanism must saturate capture
groups at each spot location, since what does not
bind washes away in processing
53Effects of Spotting Surface Morphology
Homogenous
Heterogeneous
542D, Amino Silane
552D, Aldehyde coupling
562D, Epoxy Coupling
Reacts with Primary amines, but does not require
dehydration
57Making the Perfect Microarray
58Environmental Keys
- Cleanliness
- Temperature
- Humidity
- Clean rooms helpbut arent necessary
59Easy Ways Clean Up
- Hepa Air Filters from your local hardware store
- Replace old ceiling tiles
- Keep arrayers away from air vents or add filters
to incoming air - Buy an arrayer with good environmental control
- Have a dedicated microarraying environment
60Note on Humidity
- Take it out of the room (work comfort) and add it
to the arraying chamber (sample evaporation) - It is too difficult to control an entire room,
but easy inside a small arraying chamber
61Notes on Gloves
- Avoid latex gloves that leave contaminating
protein residue - Use powder free gloves only
- Synthetic rubber
62Class-100 Clean Room Environment
- Dust-Free
- - Air filtered by ULPA Filtration
- Precisely Controlled
- - Humidity
- Temperature
TeleChem/ArrayIt.com
63When the key elements are controlled
64It works Microarray Resource Center http//array
it.com/e-library/ 1,965 total publications for
"microarray"
Miragene Inc.unpublished
MacBeath Schrieber, Science, 2891760, 2000
Schleicher-Schuellunpublished
Stears, et al. Nature Med 2003.
Zhu, H. et al. (2001)
65Personal Microarray Core Facility - 30K instead
of 150K
In development a complete line of hardware,
software, and consumables (colorimetric, single
color, enzymatic labeling)
66MicroarraysUniversal Biochemistry Platforms
Proteins
DNA
Peptides
Lipids
Small molecules
Carbohydrates