ATRP Polymerised - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

ATRP Polymerised

Description:

Nanocomposite - one or more dimensions of the material's structure ... Enhanced properties at low clay loadings compared to conventional clay/polymer mixtures. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:480
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: dch17
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ATRP Polymerised


1
  • ATRP Polymerised
  • Peg-methylether methacrylate-Montmorillonite
    Nanocomposites
  • Dr.A.Bowden
  • The University of Durham

2
Nanocomposites
Nanocomposite - one or more dimensions of the
materials structure exist at nano level.
nm
Clay
Monomer/polymer
nm
nm
Exfoliated No d-spacing
Intercalated Increased d-spacing
Conventional Composite
3
  • Nanocomposite Benefits/Uses
  • Enhanced properties at low clay loadings compared
    to conventional clay/polymer mixtures.
  • Barrier properties gases and liquids.
  • Thermal stability, flame resistance.
  • Stiffness
  • Clarity
  • More Easily Recycled
  • Uses Car parts, packaging.

4
Overview - Our Research
  • Functionalised short chain polyethylene and
    propylene oxides.
  • Water soluble add to unmodified water-suspended
    clay.
  • Variety of clays/cation exchanged clays.
  • Diversity Discovery Prepared large number of
    samples.
  • Interested in formation of intercalated
    composites rather than exfoliated
  • Clay catalysed reactions.
  • Materials/Modelling collaborations.
  • J. Mat. Chem. 2003, 13, 2540

5
Clays
  • Smectite clays Montmorillonite.
  • 2 Tetrahedral (silica)
  • 1 Octahedral (M(OH))6.
  • Swellable Alkali metal ions between layers.
  • High cation exchange capacity.
  • Large effective surface area for absorption.

6
Atom Transfer Radical Polymerisation (ATRP)
Mechanism
  • Can be done in water
  • Fast, good control over polydispersity

Wang, J. S., Matyjaszewski, K., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1995, 117, 5614 Sawamoto, M., Kamigaaito,
M., Trends Polym. Sci., 1996, 4, 371 Wang, X.-S.,
Armes S.P., Macromolecules, 2000, 33, 6640.
7
Reagents
Solid, but pH adjustment.
Peg-methylether methacrylate Mw 300 g/mol n
4-5 Mw 2,060 g/mol n 44-45
Catalyst Cu(I)Cl bipyridine
Not soluble in water, but soluble in monomer
Initiators
Monomers
Catalyst
8
ATRP Procedure
  • Add the monomer and initiator to water.
  • Perform one freeze pump/thaw/cycle.
  • Add solid catalyst components
  • Solution stirred under argon.
  • Monitor by NMR.
  • Colour change from brown to green (blue
    failure).
  • Removal of water.
  • Removal of catalyst.

9
NMR Spectra
  • Easy to monitor polymerisation
  • Alkene peak disappears
  • New peak for acrylate polymer backbone.

Monomer
ATRP 1500
ATRP 150
ATRP 1200
10
GPC Data
11
Composite Preparation
  • 1) Pre-made polymer
  • Polymer prepared by ATRP method.
  • Suspend clay, add polymer.
  • Monitor intercalation (XRD).
  • Oven dry.
  • 2) In-situ
  • Suspend clay, add monomer
  • Add initiator then catalyst.
  • Monitor reaction (FT-IR).
  • Oven dry.

12
ATRP Results XRD/FT-IR
13
XRD Spectra
150,000 M.Wt.
15,000 M. Wt.
Pre-made In-situ
Scan 2? 2½-15o, step 0.020o
14
Layers
  • Expansion 0.4 nm per layer

2.2 nm
1.8 nm
1.4 nm
1.0 nm
Trilayer???
Monolayer
Bilayer
No intercalant
2.2 nm
2.2 nm
Ref M. Lerner, J. Wu Chem. Mat., 1993, 5, 835
15
Simulation
  • Na-Montmorillonite- polyethylene glycol. 
  • 20,000 atom supercells after 1ns of molecular
    dynamics (MD) simulation.

Colour  Al light green, Mg pink, O red, C
grey, H white, Si Orange, Na light brown
(in Na-Mmt only, K purple.
16
Simulations II - Trilayers
  • K-Montmorillonite
  • Polyethylene glycol composite
  • 20,000 atom supercells after 1ns of
  • molecular dynamics (MD) simulation.
  • Na-Montmorillonite poly(ethylene oxide)
    methylether acrylate
  • 1000 atom composite after 50ps of MD simulation. 

17
  • FT-IR spectra
  • Useful for acrylates CO stretch.
  • Typically shifted by 10 20 cm-1 unsaturated
    to saturated ester.
  • In-situ identical to pre-made.

Pre-made In-situ
18
TGA data In-Situ vs. Prepared
  • In-situ shows differences, likely due to
    incomplete polymerisation.

Pre-made In-situ
19
Conclusions
  • There are differences between in-situ
    polymerisation
  • and pre-making then intercalating.
  • Degree of polymerisation/control lower.
  • TGA, FT-IR.
  • XRD exfoliation at larger d-spacing.
  • Compare to polymerisation of peg-diacrylate with
    benzoyl peroxide.

20
Acknowledgements
  • Dr. A. Whiting
  • Prof. P. Coveney, Dr. P. Boulet, Dr. H. Greenwell
    Computational
  • Prof. J. Evans, B. Chen Materials
  • EPSRC - Money
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com