SOCIO-ECONOMICS Progress report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SOCIO-ECONOMICS Progress report

Description:

Finland: Based on a semi-structured stakeholder questionnaire, investigation of ... But results provide overall little evidence of economic and social benefits of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: william650
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SOCIO-ECONOMICS Progress report


1
SOCIO-ECONOMICSProgress report
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
2
Outline
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
  • Workpackage 1
  • Publications ? Common paper
  • Tasks ahead

3
Workpackage 1
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
  • WP1 Socio-economic appraisal of peat
    exploitation
  • Divided into two main parts
  • Part1 Assessment of socio-economic importance of
    peat exploitation and alternative peatland uses
    ? Common part of WP1 to compare results between
    the EU countries
  • Part 2 Country specific studies analysing in
    more detail certain specific aspects of peatland
    utilisation with different methodologies

4
Workpackage 1
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
  • Part 1 Assessment of socio-economic importance
    of peat exploitation and alternative peatland
    uses
  • Regional distribution of peatland and
    identification of prevailing types of peat and
    peatland uses
  • Policy framework
  • Peat production
  • Peat trade
  • Employment
  • Differentiation in raw peat and processed peat
  • Alternative peatland uses focussing on
    agriculture and conservation concepts

5
Workpackage 1
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
  • Part 2 Country specific studies
  • Finland Based on a semi-structured stakeholder
    questionnaire, investigation of three main
    impacts of peat exploitation in Finland
    environmental aspects, employment and re-use of
    peat production areas.
  • Switzerland Evaluation of alternative peatland
    uses concentrating on agricultural land uses and
    tourism and peatland management using two case
    study areas, supported by stakeholder interviews
    on their perception of the different activities

6
Workpackage 1
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
  • Part 2 Country specific studies
  • Scotland Focus on economic evaluation of peat
    extraction differentiating between different
    purposes such as whisky production, local usage
    and peat exports mainly for horticulture.
  • France Sociological study of stakeholders
    perceptions of different peatland uses carried
    out in three case study areas.
  • Germany Focus on the evaluation of the policy
    framework for peatland management and protection.

7
Workpackage 1
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
Reports
  • Finland Work finished and report available.
  • France Part 1 finished part 2 on-going report
    available summer 2005
  • Germany Work on-going report available summer
    2005
  • Scotland Work finished report under revision
  • Switzerland Part 1 finished and report
    available part 2a finished and report available
    part 2b on-going report available summer 2005.

8
Publications
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
Common paper (other country specific paper
planned in Finland and Switzerland)
  • Background and focus of the paper
  • Focus on peatland rehabilitation not on further
    peat extraction
  • Peat extraction provides only economic and social
    benefits with high environmental costs
  • But results provide overall little evidence of
    economic and social benefits of peat extraction,
    only in Finland some regional importance
  • Peatland rehabilitation can provide
    environmental, economic and social benefits

9
Publications
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
Figure 1 Benefits and costs from peatland
utilisation
10
Common paper
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
Aim
  • To evaluate opportunities and conflicts for
    peatland utilisation and rehabilitation in
    Finland, France, Germany, Scotland and
    Switzerland.

Sub-objectives
  • To analyse potential economic and social benefits
    of different re-use options of exploited
    peatlands and to compare these with the
    socio-economic benefits from peat extraction.
  • To discuss the potential environmental
    implications of re-use options and identify
    conflicts for peatland rehabilitation.

11
Common paper
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
Preliminary title and structure
Opportunities and conflicts for peatland
rehabilitation in Europe A socio-economic
comparison of case studies from Finland, France,
Germany, Scotland and Switzerland
  1. Introduction
  2. Socio-economic importance of peat extraction in
    the country case studies
  3. Peat extraction, re-use of peatland and peatland
    protection sustainable utilisation of peatland
  4. Socio-economic benefits of different re-use
    options of peatlands in the country case studies
    and their implications for peatland
    rehabilitation
  5. Conclusion

12
Tasks ahead
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
  • Paper is based on the work already carried out
    but requires some additional work
  • In some countries focus has been more on
    implications of peat extraction, hence, more work
    on re-use of peatland is needed
  • Link to WP7 Define (recommend) different re-use
    and management options for peatland and their
    socio-economic implications in the country case
    studies

13
Some questions
RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May
2005
  • Do we (RECIPE) focus on re-use options for
    peatland and their rehabilitation potential
    (instead of opportunities for peat extraction)?
  • Does the common paper idea represent the (broad)
    interests of the whole group?
  • Future feedback from the whole group
  • Implication for possible re-use scenarios and
    their socio-economic implications (WP7)
  • information about thresholds beyond which
    rehabilitation is no longer possible
  • Future tasks and project resources?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com