Title: Quadrant diode configuration
1Quadrant diode configuration
X or configuration? ISYS quadrant diodes
2X or configuration?
3Comparison X and configuration
- Relative sensitivity of X configuration
- Virgo QDs are used in X configuration
- Same signal-to-noise-ratio as config.
- Couplings
- Horizontal/vertical error signal couplings
- X config couplings for hv miscentering
- Misalignment sensitivity
- Strong horizontal or vertical misalignment
- X config may give no error signal
- Conclusion
- For new QD front ends
- configuration desirable
vs.
4Simulation h/v couplings
- Simulation of horizontal/vertical coupling
- Normalized asymmetry fluctuates - 0.5 0.5
(C7) - X config 4 coupling Tx - Ty
- config none
Q81 (8 hours)
dh dv 0.3
Normalized asymmetry
Power as seen by QD (horizontal)
C7
Normalized asymmetry
5ISYS quadrant diodes
Overview
6ISYS Quadrants PHD (IMC, RFC) (Preliminary
results)
Quadrant photodiode specifications - Centronic
QD40-4x, silicon photodiode (EGG YAG 444-4) -
7.98mm diam, 200microns gap, 0.4 A/W (11.4 mm,
0.45 A/W) - 120V bias (IMC RFC) (180 V) -
10mA peak current (3 mA) - geometrical
configuration (X configuration) Quadrant box
specs. - 6 MHz 22 MHz, demodulation done
onboard (RFC, IMC respectively) - IMC RFC
involved in servo-loops - vertic/horiz error
signals (AC DC) provided onboard, BNC
connectors (unipolar) - R_ac 50 kohm -
4quadrants, shot noise limited for 16 mA,
should be 0.6mA, (need TBC and check reason
for extra noise) (in that case, S/N would be
equivalent to Frascati quadrants)
Frascati QDs
7ISYS Quadrants PHD (IMC, RFC, PMC, SL)
Centering electronics
8ISYS Quadrant PHD (IMC, RFC, PMC, SL)
- Discussion
- we can work shot noise limited with present
ISYS quadrants - Question
- Is it worth to extend LA standard for ISYS
quadrants (24)? - Main advantage standardization
- Price to pay
- - Extra demodulation boards
- - Extra cabling
- - Swap translation stages
- - rearrange optical setup? (VIRGO quadrant box
larger) - What about QDs for monitoring SL PMC (nearly
same as IMC RFC) (14 MHz)? - What about DC QDs (BMS, MC end mirror
transmission)? - at present EGO is to provide those QDs (UDT
photodiodes already bought), - use temporarily PMC QDs (for BMS), and Nice
QD for MC mirror
9End
10LA electronics
TStage driver
Demodulator board (2 channel)
Phase shifter (2 channel)
QD front end
11Quadrant photodiode
- type EGG YAG 444
- sensitivity 0.45 A/W
- DC power 3 mWmax
- transimpedance 2 k?
- Bias voltage 180 V
12QD electronics
Quadrant diode box
13Scheme of LA electronics
14Noise measurements
15Influence of QD power
16Fast quadrant centering system
- Couplings
- Coupling with longitudinal error signals
- Horizontal/vertical error signals are coupled if
h v miscentering - Coupling with waist mismatch
- Coupling with longitudinal noise
- Better rms centering required
- See G. Vajentes talk (Napoli 03/10/2005)
- Bad mirror motion reconstruction
- Not understood
- Fast QD centering system could remain ON all time
- Control signal would be used for beam
stabilization - Present system too noisy
17Requirements for centering
With the present centering configuration
(activates every few minutes) RMS change of a
factor of 4 Extrapolating from these
measurements Taking a reasonable range around
the minimum, the maximum DC asymmetry must be
less than 0.1
Even with the best centering rate now possible
(every 4-5 seconds) we cant reach this precision.