Bartol Flux Calculation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Bartol Flux Calculation

Description:

Extend to make MC calculation more efficient, but do not want to extend in ... Shortcut in 1D, since ?P = ?D, generate primaries flat in cos?P, weight by cos?P ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: giles9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bartol Flux Calculation


1
Bartol Flux Calculation
  • presented by Giles Barr, Oxford
  • ICRR-Kashiwa
  • December 2004

2
Outline
  • Neutrino calculation
  • Computational considerations
  • Results
  • Systematic errors (excluding hadron production
    and primary fluxes which is tomorrow)
  • Improvements

3
Injection height 80km
  • Track forward.
  • When first neutrino hits detector, perform cutoff
    calculation i.e. track back.
  • Forward stepping equal steps except
  • smaller near Earth surface or when near end of
    range.
  • large steps for high energy muons
  • Backward stepping adaptive step sizes depending
    on the amount of bending and the distance from
    the earth.

4
  • Avoid rounding errors when stepping down. Use
    local ?h during tracking.
  • Do not use centre of earth as origin and compute
  • each step

?1
?2
?h
5
Shower graphic from ICRC
80km altitude
Detector
Earths surface
No energy threshold
80km altitude
Detector
Threshold 300 MeV
Earths surface
80km altitude
Detector
Earths surface
Threshold 1 GeV
  • L smaller in 3D

6
3D Is it important?
3D bigger gt30
3D bigger 10-30
3D bigger 3-10
lt3
1D bigger 3-10
1D bigger 10-30
SuperKamiokande Collaboration hep-ex/0404034
7
Detector shape
  • Main technique
  • Use flat detector on surface of Earth.
  • Extend to make MC calculation more efficient, but
    do not want to extend in vertical direction as
    3-D effect is very sensitive in that direction
    (P.Lipari). ? Flat.
  • Second technique
  • Spherical detector neutrino hits detector if
    direction is within ?cut of neutrino direction
    weight event by apparent detector size.

Bend at 20km
Bend a60o
8
How big can the detector be ?
9
Kamioka
10
(No Transcript)
11
Correction if your detector is too big...
12
Weight problem...
  • With flat detector, weight by 1/cos?D
  • Shortcut in 1D, since ?P ?D, generate primaries
    flat in cos?P, weight by cos?P
  • Total weight cos?P/ cos?D 1.
  • In 3D, ?P ? ?D, so must face situation of very
    large 1/cos?D. Various tricks.

Modified individual weights Weight zero very
close to divergence and weight a bit higher in
neighboring region cosq1.00 ? 0.10 weight
1/cosq cosq0.10 ? 0.01 weight
1/(0.9cosq) cosq0.01 ? 0.00 weight 0
Binlet weights Weight of each bin 1/cosq
determined at bin centre. With 20 bins, bias is
large (5), therefore it is done with 80
binlets (bias 1.5).
Bias If the flux is flat within a bin No
bias. Otherwise, bias 1 rg r fractional
difference in flux from centre to edge of
bin g fraction of bin set to weight 0 (0.1)
Bias If the flux is flat within the bin No
bias. Otherwise bias 1 r/3 r fractional
difference in flux from centre to edge of
bin (r can be as large as 15 for bins of Dcosq
0.1)
13
A little history...
  • Before full 3D was tuned to be fast enough DST
    method.
  • Based on idea of trigger in experiment
  • Rough calculation done first
  • Neutrinos which went near detector got repeat
    full treatment.
  • Speed up by reusing rough calculation at lots of
    points on Earth (always same ?Z).

14
A bit more on technique...
  • Plug and play modules of code
  • Hadron production module
  • Target (different versions)
  • Simple test generators
  • Used Honda_int for tests
  • Decay generator
  • Atmospheric model

15
Results
16
df/d ln(E) (m-2s-1sr-1)
17
Give fluxes vs E
18
Azimuth angle distributionEast-West effect
N
E
S
W
N
N
E
S
W
N
E?gt315 MeV
E?gt315 MeV
19
Energy dependence of East-West effect
20
Flavour ratios
21
(No Transcript)
22
Down/Horizontal Ratios
23
Up/Down asymmetry
24
Some systematics
25
Cross section change
Effect of artificial increase in total cross
section of 15
26
AtmosphericDensity
27
Associative production
  • Effect of a 15 reduction in ?K production

28
Effects not considered
  • Later talk on hadron model and primary fluxes
  • Effect of mountain at Kamioka. (effects of
    altitude variation around the earth are in, but
    no local Kamioka map).
  • Solar wind Assume it can be lumped in with flux
    uncertainty.
  • Charm production.
  • Neutral kaon regeneration.
  • Polarisation in 3 body decays.

29
Summary
  • Considered here all systematic errors except
    hadron production and fluxes (next talk).
  • Most of them are small.
  • 3D effects are not large, but increase in program
    complexity is large.
  • Cross checks between calculations.
  • Improvements
  • Mountain needed ?
  • Use more information from muon fluxes.

30
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com