http:isb'wa'govcommitteessiec

1
Welcome

• http//isb.wa.gov/committees/siec/

2
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome

3
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005

4
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan

5

Technical Implementation Plan (TIP) Overview
Federal Engineering, Inc. SIEC Meeting November
7, 2005
6
Agenda

• Review and discuss Technical Implementation Plan
• High-level review of TIP content
• Summary of SAW feedback and comments
• Open discussion for comments, questions,
  clarification

7
How has the TIP evolved?

• Initial outline discussed with DIS and SAW in May
  2005
• TIP Version 1 created on August 15
• Several new versions created during September
  through mid-October based on interaction with SAW
  and DIS
• Plain talk applied to Executive Summary
• Several primary areas of clarification/change
• Architecture, governance, implementation plan
• Most recent version (8) created based on final
  SAW feedback on October 26

8
What is in the TIP?

• Executive summary
• Program summary
• Background
• Plan description
• System conceptual design
• Governance
• Implementation planning
• Financial implications
• Critical success factors
• Next steps
• Appendices

9
Executive summary

• What was our approach to planning?
• What technologies were chosen for the proposed
  system?
• How will the proposed system be planned and
  managed?
• What will be different from how things are done
  today?
• When and how will the proposed system be
  implemented?
• What will the proposed system cost?
• What are we spending today for the existing
  systems?
• What benefits does the proposed system provide?
• What other public safety groups can benefit from
  the proposed system?
• What are the risks that we face?
• What happens next?

10
Program summary

• Brief history of the planning effort
• Review of SIEC goals
• Description of the interoperability challenge
• Review of DHS SAFECOM interoperability matrix
• Purpose and objectives of the TIP

11
Background

• Overview of the planning project since August,
  2004
• Forum meetings and interviews
• Web-based survey
• Inventory Report
• Development of alternatives
• Alternatives report
• Overview of system architecture

12
Plan description

• Relationship of TIP to SIEC vision/goals
• Description of core agencies
• And how other agencies may participate/benefit
• Constraints and dependencies
• System development guidelines and relationship to
  SIEC Guiding Principles

13
System conceptual design

• Consistent with SAR content
• Multiple elements
• Radio over IP (RoIP)
• Expanded mutual aid
• P25-based digital systems
• Based on agency requirements
• Common control centers
• Mobile data
• Towers and supporting infrastructure
• Frequency management
• Need for common approach across state agencies
• Rebanding/narrowbanding considerations

14
Governance

• Review of various models and strategies
• Definition of primary processes
• Strategic planning
• Asset ownership
• System management and operation
• Maintenance
• Alternative approaches and recommendations for
  each process

15
Governance (continued)

• System management and operation options
• Continue current approach
• Lead agency
• Governance board
• Advantages/disadvantages of each option
• Analysis of alignment with EA principles and SIEC
  Guiding Principles
• Recommend migration to lead agency
• Designate now give a clear direction
• Transition as new technology implementation would
  best be implemented and managed centrally
• Other approaches may be considered on
  agency-specific basis

16
Governance (continued)

• Strategic Planning
• Remains with SIEC
• Asset ownership
• Follows the need for the technology to be managed
• No immediate transfers or accounting shifts
• Transition when new technology is implemented
• Consideration of legislation or accounting
  constraints
• Maintenance
• Manage internally as is done today
• Some use of radio shop services where necessary
• Consider requesting outsourcing proposals in
  system-wide RFP

17
Implementation planning

• First priority is to create significant
  improvements in interoperability with
  local/tribal/federal agencies
• Identify most likely technology-based solution
• Trial in one area/region
• Assess and deploy statewide
• Expand mutual aid and backbone capabilities
• Implement a pilot of P25 multiple subsystems
  architecture
• Implement common network control centers
• Implement multiple subsystems architecture using
  agency-specific approach
• Integrate with planning for other initiatives
  (agency-, SIEC-, or FCC-driven)

18
Financial implications

• Acquisition costs remain the same from the System
  Architecture Report (SAR) - 257 Million
• Recurring costs are also the same - 25 Million
  per year after full implementation
• Total recurring costs during ten-year lifecycle
  are slightly higher due to six-year
  implementation schedule vs. eight-year schedule
  in initial TIP
• 177 Million vs. 137 Million
• Total ten-year lifecycle costs are 434 Million
  (vs. 394 Million in initial TIP)
• Current estimates for state agencies over same
  period is 344 Million
• Benefits of proposed system are outlined along
  with suggested funding approaches

19
Critical success factors

• Governance
• Gaining commitment
• State agencies
• Local/tribal agencies
• Funding
• Technology/process issues
• Frequency management
• Network capacity
• Mapping of benefits to SIEC goals

20
Next steps

• Conduct a statewide interoperability summit
• Implement a state agency governance structure
• Overall program management to move this effort
  forward
• Institute statewide spectrum management
• Develop the business plan
• Initiate the short-term interoperability
  improvements
• Technology-based solution, mutual aid
  enhancements
• Initiate the agency-based design and procurement
  phase and begin developing an RFP
• Continue implementing the interim plan
  recommendations as appropriate

21
Appendices

• Appendix A Overview of the SIEC deliverables
• Appendix B Description of the technical
  alternative solutions considered by the state
• Appendix C An overview of Project 25 standards
• Appendix D Examples of statewide radio systems
• Appendix E Cost estimate assumptions
• Appendix F Process change requirements
• Appendix G Glossary of terms and acronyms
• Appendix H Analysis of governance alternatives

22
Technical Implementation Plan

• Open discussion

23
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments

24
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program

25
OVERVIEW AND PROPOSED STATEMENT OF WORK
Joe Noce, Site Manager Jolene Hollingshead, Tech
Lead State Interoperability Executive
Committee November 7, 2005
26
What is ICTAP? Interoperable Communications
Technical Assistance Program
Funded from the Department of Homeland Security
through the Office for Domestic Preparedness to
provide State and Urban areas in receipt of
Homeland Security Grant Program funding with
technical assistance to enhance interoperable
communications.

• The ICTAP team includes
• Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center
• LGI / SEARCH / INVERTEX

27
ICTAP Goals

• Enhance Public Safety Interoperability with
  regard to WMD terrorism threats
• Provide capability for individuals and agencies
  to communicate with whom they need to, whenever
  and wherever required
• Leverage existing Federal, State and local
  on-going efforts whenever possible

28
ICTAP Policy Services

• Development of interagency work processes
• Development of representative working groups
• Regional strategic coordination for multiple UAs
  and/or States
• Coordination of urban area and national policy
  issues

29
ICTAP Interoperability and Implementation Services

• Document SOPs, MOUs, MOAs, IGAs, ILAs
• Provide engineering advice and best practices

30
ICTAP Needs Analysis Services

• Develop tabletop exercises
• Inventory existing interoperable communications
  equipment, procedures, and capabilities
• Map interoperable communications capabilities and
  methods
• Conduct a communications gap analysis

31
CASM Tool

• Tool for interoperability analysis and planning
• Statewide data collection
• Incomplete for CASM
• Will require additional information to be
  collected
• Will require reformatting of available data

32
(No Transcript)
33
All or Specific Selections
Map Icon Layers
Interoperability Functions
Map Context Reference (when using Zoom Feature)
Cursor Position
34
(No Transcript)
35
ICTAP in Washington

• Review and comment on the Technical
  Implementation Plan
• (Task complete)
• Assist in the development of a business plan
  based upon the SIEC approved body of work.
• Assist the SIEC in the development of a marketing
  Plan

36
ICTAP in Washington

• Act as liaison with surrounding Urban Area
  Working Groups
• Help develop a governance model for the SIEC
  designed to meet their specifications
• Provide assistance with the Statewide
  Interoperability Summit
• Provide access to CASM

37
QUESTIONS?
38
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

39
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

• Department of Corrections request for frequency

40
Department of Corrections, request for frequencies

• Jose Zuniga, DOC

41
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

• Department of Corrections request for frequency
• Public comment

42
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

• Department of Corrections request for frequency
• Public comment
• 800 MHz Rebanding Committee

43
800 MHz Rebanding Committee

• Dennis Hausman, DIS

44
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

• Department of Corrections request for frequency
• Public comment
• 800 MHz Rebanding Committee
• Public comment

45
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

• Department of Corrections request for frequency
• Public comment
• 800 MHz Rebanding Committee
• Public comment
• On Scene Command and Control Radio (OSCCR) Base
  Station Project

46
On Scene Command and Control Radio (OSCCR) Base
Station Project

• Dennis Hausman, DIS

47
Recap

• August 15, SIEC approved MOU to be distributed by
  EMD and WSDOT for the use of OSCCR for on scene
  command and control radios

48
OSCCR Base Station Project

• Was included in the SIEC business plan sent to
  the Washington Military Department
• Will deploy 14 base stations in southern and
  eastern WA
• Base stations will permit an incident commander
  to communicate with the EOC, WSP and WSDOT
• Locations were selected based upon these factors
• Fire mitigation
• All hazards risk mitigation

49
OSCCR Base Station Project

• SIEC notified that we would receive grant in
  April
• Money would become available in September

50
Next steps

• WSP agreed to complete an engineering plan and
  budget for the project
• Once completed, ongoing costs will be determined
• Agencies receiving equipment must agree to absorb
  the ongoing costs
• WSDOT has agreed to absorb ongoing costs
• EMD has agreed to absorb ongoing costs
• WSP currently calculating ongoing costs

51
Next steps

• Once the ongoing costs are agreed to, the project
  will begin.
• Duration of the project is 13-months

52
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

• Department of Corrections request for frequency
• Public comment
• 800 MHz Rebanding Committee
• Public comment
• On Scene Command and Control Radio (OSCCR) Base
  Station Project
• Public comment

53
SIEC Agenda

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

• Department of Corrections request for frequency
• Public comment
• 800 MHz Rebanding Committee
• Public comment
• On Scene Command and Control Radio (OSCCR) Base
  Station Project
• Public comment
• New Business

54
SIEC Agenda

• Department of Corrections request for frequency
• Public comment
• 800 MHz Rebanding Committee
• Public comment
• On Scene Command and Control Radio (OSCCR) Base
  Station Project
• Public comment
• New Business
• Adjourn

• Welcome
• Approve minutes of June 23, 2005
• Technical Implementation Plan
• Public comments
• Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance
  Program
• Public comments

55
Thank you for attending the SIEC Meeting

• http//isb.wa.gov/committees/siec/