Errors in Transfer Orders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Errors in Transfer Orders

Description:

Ccreatinine test that showed her kidneys were functioning normally ... She misread the chart and failed to see that the gentamicin had been discontinued ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: kei106
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Errors in Transfer Orders


1
Errors in Transfer Orders
  • Keith Lau, M.D.
  • Department of Pediatrics
  • McMaster University
  • October 15, 2009

2
(No Transcript)
3
Setting
  • A 75-year-old lady developed a methicillin-resista
    nt Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the hospital
    following knee replacement surgery
  • Ccreatinine test that showed her kidneys were
    functioning normally
  • After weighing the potential for harm from the
    infection and potential side effects from the
    medication

4
Setting
  • Decided to include gentamicin, together with
    vancomycin and rifampicin, in her treatment
    regimen
  • The course of gentamicin was to be very short
  • Was to be discontinued prior to her transfer to a
    nursing home
  • Discharge antibiotics would be IV vancomycin and
    oral rifampicin

5
Discharge orders mixed up
6
Setting
  • Attending physician was on vacation when the
    patient was transferred to the nursing home
  • The nurse contacted the physicians partner over
    the phone for the orders
  • Then, the nurse drafted a Patient Transfer Form
    that accompanied the patient to the nursing home

7
Setting
  • Contrary to the attending physicians initial
    plan
  • Gentamicin was included in the list of
    medications
  • gentamicin 120 mg IV piggybag every 12 hours,
    next dose, 9 pm today, 6/10

8
Setting
  • At the nursing home, the patient continued to
    receive IV gentamicin
  • On day 3 after the transfer, the patient had
    trouble in urinating
  • Creatinine was checked and was abnormally high

9
Setting
  • Creatinine was repeated
  • Gentamicin was not discontinue
  • The result came back the next day, and was even
    higher and then
  • Gentamicin was then stopped
  • Patient suffered from acute renal failure that
    required acute hemodialysis

10
Case
  • Plaintiff Lady A
  • Defendants
  • Hospital B
  • Dr. C (ID specialist)
  • Nursing Home D
  • Dr. E (ID specialist)
  • Nurse F (nurse of Hospital B)
  • Dr. G (staff physician at Nursing Home D)

11
Nurse F(employee of Hospital A who drafted the
transfer form)
  • Testified that
  • she drafted the transfer order (including the
    gentamicin)
  • She spoke to Dr. E on the phone for the orders
    before lady A was transferred
  • Dr. E was contacted because Dr. C was on vacation

12
Nurse F
  • could not remember the particular conversation
    with Dr. E
  • custom and practice would have been for Dr. E to
    ask her for the information contained in the
    chart
  • she would have written the order exactly as Dr. E
    gave to her and
  • would have read it back to him for verification

13
Nurse G (plaintiffs nursing
expert)Nurse H (Director of nursing of Nursing
Home D)
  • testified that
  • Expect a reasonably well-qualified nurse to know
    that gentamicin is nephrotoxic
  • Nurse F deviated from the standard of care by
    listing gentamicin on the order because Dr. C did
    not call for it
  • If Nurse F told Dr. E that Dr. Cs plan called
    for plaintiff to be placed on gentamicin, it was
    also a deviation from the standard

14
Nurse G (plaintiffs nursing expert)Nurse H
(Director of nursing of Nursing Home D)
  • Transfer form provides a continuity of care
  • Never seen a medication listed on transfer form
    that had been discontinued before the transfer

15
Nurse I (nurse at Nursing Home D)
  • testified that
  • Relied on the medication list on the transfer
    form to prepare her own physician order form for
    the plaintiff
  • Based on the transfer form, she believed that the
    plaintiff was to receive gentamicin

16
Dr. E(Gave the transfer order over the phone)
  • Testified that
  • He could not specifically recall the conversation
    with Nurse F
  • It was his custom and practice to have the nurse
    convey to him over the phone the plan put in the
    chart by his partner
  • Wanted to follow his partners plan

17
Dr. E
  • Would only have ordered gentamicin if he had been
    told the it was part of the plan
  • Must have been mis-informed
  • Agree that Nursing Home D was dependent on
    getting the accurate information from Hospital B
    as to what care the plaintiff should get after
    the transfer
  • Based on how the transfer form was written, he
    would expect the staff at Nursing Home to
    continue the gentamicin

18
Dr. J (attending physician at Nursing Home D)
  • Testified
  • Transfer form is to give the doctor in the
    nursing home a guidance how to continue treating
    the patients
  • Up to him to determine whether to follow or not
  • The orders appeared reasonable
  • Decided to leave the medications as is

19
Dr. J
  • He was questioned on
  • Why he did not check blood tests for kidney
    functions for 2 days
  • Why he did not discontinue the gentamicin after
    the creatinine came back to be abnormally high

20
Dr. J
  • Testified
  • Nursing Home did not check daily labs for kidney
    functions unless the patient had some known past
    history of kidney problems
  • On a.m. of June 13, he was informed about
    plaintiff had trouble in urinating
  • Did not stop the gentamicin at that time
  • Concern about infection
  • the MRSA infection might cause the plaintiff to
    lose a limb or her life

21
Dr.K(Plaintiffs kidney specialist)
  • Testified that
  • As a result of the prolonged treatment of
    gentamicin
  • The plaintiff suffered permanent kidney failure
  • Would require dialysis for the rest of her life

22
Progress
  • Plaintiffs MRSA infection resolved favorably and
    she returned to live at home
  • But now has permanent renal failure and required
    chronic hemodialysis 3 times weekly for the
    remainder of her life

23
Conclusions
  • No question about the negligence of the hospital
    nurse who did the paperwork for the transfer
  • She misread the chart and failed to see that the
    gentamicin had been discontinued

24
Verdict
  • The only defendant found liable
  • Hospital B
  • based on Nurse Fs negligently informing Dr. E
    that the long-term antibiotic plan from Dr. C was
    to include gentamicin
  • Dr. J was not liable
  • Jury awarded plaintiff 3,200,000

25
Take home message
  • It is a challenge but important to ensure
    medicine reconciliation
  • Patient transition points are especially
    vulnerable to medication errors
  • Take extra time to review the list and if in
    doubt, ask
  • Simple solution can go a long way to decrease
    medication errors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com