Cooley - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cooley

Description:

Human nature mirrors in each person the social order in which they act out their ... 3) Does Cooley's theory of the self rely on a nonrational element or faith? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: soc6
Learn more at: http://www.csun.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cooley


1
Cooleys
  • Human Nature
  • The Social Order
  • Part I
  • Presented by Tina Quicoli


2
Introduction
  • Cooleys theory is both one on human nature and
    social order.
  • For him, human nature does not have content and
    meaning superior to the social order.
  • Human nature mirrors in each person the social
    order in which they act out their lives.
  • The imaginations that people have of one another
    are the solid facts of society.
  • Language supplies society with a
    self-understanding. Social communication is
    fundamental to selfhood.
  • Language allows us to see ourselves as others see
    us, so that we can address ourselves as others
    address us.
  • The locus of society emerges through our
    experiences in meaningful communication.
  • Without an imagery of self or a common
    consciousness society would doubt that it exists.
  • Society is mental for Cooley. That is, it exists
    in the minds as the contact and reciprocal
    influence of certain ideas called I.

3
  • The self has three principal elements
  • 1. The imagination of our appearance to others.
  • 2. The imagination of judgment of our appearance
    by the other person.
  • 3. Some sort of self feeling such as pride
    or mortification.
  • Cooley believes that society is an affair of
    consciousness.
  • He describes three types of consciousness self
    consciousness, social consciousness, and public
    consciousness.
  • Ones self-consciousness allows them to reflect
    on the ideas about their self that are attributed
    to the other.
  • We exist in our imagination of them. It is only
    in the imaginations that others have of us that
    we are able to affect them.

4
Society and the Individual
  • When our lives begin two elements of history are
    drawn upon, the heredity and social. These
    elements merge together to create a new whole
    that ceases to exist as separate forces.
  • Society and the individual are not separate
    phenomena, but are collective and distributive
    aspects of the same thing.
  • When we speak about society we think about the
    general view of the people, and when we speak of
    the individual we disregard aspects and think
    about them as if they were separate.
  • The human mind is social, society is mental, and
    society and the mind are aspects of the same
    thing.
  • The imagination is the naïve expression of a
    socialization of the mind that underlies all
    later thinking.
  • The mind lives is a perpetual conversation. The
    impulse to communicate is an inseparable part of
    thought.
  • The mind is not a hermits cell but a place of
    hospitality.

5
  • To imagine is to be come real in a social sense.
    A person is real only though imagining an inner
    life that exists in us. That is, all real
    persons are imaginary.
  • The personality can be described as a group or
    system of thought associated with the symbols
    that stand for them.
  • Society may then be said to be a relation among
    personal ideas.
  • The individual and society must therefore be
    studied in the imagination.
  • The imaginations that individuals have of each
    other are the solid facts of society.
  • Thus, the object of study is an imaginative idea
    or group of ideas in the mind..
  • A social person is a fact in the mind, which may
    be observed there.

6
Freedom
  • The individual has organic freedom, which is
    worked out by cooperating with others. The
    individual cannot simply do things independent of
    society, they must function in their own way, but
    they have to play the game as life brings it.
  • Freedom may be defined as the contrast between
    what man is and what he might be as out
    experiences of life enable us to imagine.
  • Freedom may be thought of as the individual
    aspect of progress the individual and the social
    order.
  • Freedom can exist only in and through a social
    order.
  • The notion of freedom is in accord with a general
    or vague sentiment. It is the notion of fair
    play, of giving everyone
  • a chance. Nothing upsets us more than the
    belief that
  • someone or some class does not have a fair
    chance.
  • Therefore, in our view of freedom we believe that
    we
  • have a right to.

7
Defining the I
  • The word self refers to the first person. It can
    be expressed through words such as I, me, my,
    mine, and myself.
  • The I is a fact like other facts. The I means
    feeling or its expression
  • The feeling of the self may be regarded as
    instinctive.
  • We are born with the need to assert ourselves,
    but whether we do our not or not depends on the
    opportunities offered to us in the social
    process.
  • The meaning of the I is learned just as other
    words of
  • emotion and sentiment are learned.
  • This feeling of the self undergoes
    differentiation and
  • refinement just as any other sort of innate
    feeling.
  • In common speech, I usually refers to opinions
    purpose,
  • desires, and claims.
  • It should be noted that my and mine are more the
  • names of the self. However, the I refers
    more to
  • Miscellaneous possessions.

8
A Social Self
  • The social self is any idea, or systems of ideas
    that are drawn from the communicative life, which
    the mind takes to be its own.
  • The I of common speech has meaning that includes
    some sort of reference to other people.
  • It is doubtful if it is even possible to use
    language without thinking of someone else.
  • It may then be concluded that what we call me,
    mine, or myself, is not something separate from
    general life, but rather it is both general and
    individual.
  • We care for it because it is the part of the mind
    that is living and strives to impress itself upon
    the minds of the others.
  • The intense self-consciousness regarding it is
    combined with instinct or experiences that
    connects it with the thoughts of others.
  • We bring the I into the social world and we put
    our self-consciousness into it.

9
Discussion Questions
  • 1) Consider the agency structure debate or
    Alexanders distinction between individualistic
    and collectivistic theories Where does Cooleys
    theory fall?
  • 2) Do you believe we have the self-feeling
    that Cooley describes? Is this self-self feeling
    an important notion? What do you think Cooley
    means when he says that the self-feeling is in
    part an instinct?
  • 3) Does Cooleys theory of the self rely on a
    nonrational element or faith?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com