Impact of the one-parameter approximation on the shape of optically-thick lines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Impact of the one-parameter approximation on the shape of optically-thick lines

Description:

... minimum one to two orders of magnitude higher than the calculated one on the ... In order to determine Ks one needs to know only the a-value instead of the exact ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: ASTR57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Impact of the one-parameter approximation on the shape of optically-thick lines


1
Impact of the one-parameter approximation on the
shape of optically-thick lines
D. Karabourniotis University of Crete GREECE
COST-529, Meeting at Mierlo, March 2006
2
Plasma spectroscopy an open problem
Diagnosing high-pressure discharges by
optically-thick lines is an asymptotic process
starting somewhere get a first picture, which
gradually refines A correct interpretation of
diagnostics results need an understanding of the
plasma as it helps to improve this understanding
Diagnostics is yet an open problem due to a lack
of fundamental physical knowledge
(understanding) In this sense plasma spectroscopy
is yet an open problem
3
Outline
v Expression of line intensity and in terms of
reduced functions for the plasma structure and
the line profile v One-Parameter Approximation
(OPA) for the source function v Validity of OPA
to represent emissivity in case of position
dependent line profile v Numerical examples of
line shapes and optical-depth profiles v
Experimental line shapes and optical-depth
profiles v Numerical tests for the determination
of the inhomogeneity parameter using the OPA
model
4
Intensity of a spectral line
  • Symmetric plasma layer

I?
xo
-xo
0
x
Emissivity
Planck law
Density of the Upper
Density of the Lower
5
Line emissivity in terms of x
Position-dependent line profile
6
Case of the Lorentz profile
Relative Lorentz profile
7
Line emissivity in terms of y
xo
-xo
0
x
I?
1
0
y
2
8
Self-reversed lines
IM
Im
Condition for reversal permits determination of
tst(?0s)
Emissivity at the line maximum
Ks?(?0s) becomes a function of ?(y) and Q (s0
,y)
9
One-Parameter Approximation (OPA)
a (alpha) inhomogeneity parameter
10
Validity of the OPA to represent Ks
  • Case
  • Position independent line profile, P(?,?)P(?)
  • Position dependent line profile, P(?,?)
  • Atomic collision broadening
  • Electronic collision broadening

11
dc ?
?i/?d1.03
?i/?dlt1.003
Accuracy of the one-parameter approach (OPA) for
representing Ks when P(?,?)P(?) better than 3
Karabourniotis, van der Mullen (2005)
12
Atomic collision broadening
Decreasing L(x) Parabolic T(x), a1.62
?s
Without shift
12.6
d c
(i)
(d)
s0s/d0
13
Decreasing L(x) Parabolic T(x), a1.62
With shift
?s
d c
(i)
(d)
s0s/d0
14
Hollow L(x)
d c
a2.64
?s
(i)
(d)
Increasing L(x)
d c
a6
(d)
(i)
s0s/d0
15
Parabolic T(x)
Decreasing L(x), a1.62
?i/?d
Atomic collision broadening
Hollow L(x), a2.64
s0s/d0
16
Electronic collision broadening
?i/?d
Decreasing L(x) a1.62
s0s/d0
17
Atomic collision broadening
?(?)
t(?)
w(?-?0)/d0?
Decreasing L(x), Parabolic T(x), s0 4, ?
0.73 (a1.62)
18
?(?)
t(?)
w(?-?0)/d0?
Increasing L(x), Parabolic T(x), s0 4,
?0.3 (a 4.1)
19
Electronic collision broadening
?(?)
t(?)
w(?-?0)/d0?
Decreasing L(x), Parabolic T(x), s0 4, ?
1.74 (a1.62)
20
Experimental I(?) and t(?)
Neutr. Filter
Choper
L
M/Chr
Spher. Mir.
Uncertainty Neutral-filter absorbance 90
tNF4.5, ?t/t4.6
21
Hg- 5461
PHILIPS R6 mm, Ig18 mm, 7.14 mg Hg, 100mbar
Ar/Kr, 150 W, 2.7A, P3 atm
Karabourniotis, Drakakis, Palladas XX ICPIG, 1991
22
Tl- 5350
OSRAM R9 mm, Ig48 mm, 60mg Hg, 6 mg TlI, 30 mb
Ar 300 W, 2.8A, P6atm
Drakakis, Palladas, Karabourniotis J. Phys. D
1992
23
Emission line
Na D-lines
PHILIPS R6 mm, Ig18 mm, 5 mg Hg,1.87 mg NaI,
100mbar Ar/Kr, 150 W, 3.65 A,
P2.8 atm
24
Absorption profile
Na D-lines

25
Experimental observations
v Optical depth at the line center, t0, one order
of magnitude lower than the calculated one on the
basis of the classical theories v Intensity at
the line minimum one to two orders of magnitude
higher than the calculated one on the basis of
the classical theories
26
Determination of alpha (a)
Hg-5461, LTE, d c, Lin.(1) T(x), a2.23
23
log(IM/Im)
15
7.4
4.2
log(so)
27
7.4
D
6
log(IM/Im)
28
Na-5890, Hollow L(x), d c, Para. T(x), a 2.18
L
log(IM/Im)
r?
6
log(so)
29
6
D
log(IM/Im)
30
Tl-5350 Increasing L(x), d c, Constr.
T(x), a 18
log(IM/Im)
22
log(so)
31
Conclusions
  • For optical depths lt12 the Ks-value is affected
    from the radial change of P(?,x) by less than 2.
  • In order to determine Ks one needs to know only
    the a-value instead of the exact plasma
    structure.
  • The difference in Ks using the OPA is less than
    5
  • The measurements give optical depths at the line
    center less than 6.
  • The determination of alpha is proved to be
    possible at these low optical depths using the
    OPA model.

32
(No Transcript)
33
Sechin, Starostin et al, JQSRT 58, 887
(1997) Resonance radiation transfer in dense
media
34
Emission line
Auto-lamp Very high-pressure P 20-40atm
Na D-lines ?D-line
20 Å ----------------
5894
Philips-Dusseldorf
35
Hg-5461, LTE, d constant, Para(2) T(x), a1.23
log(IM/Im)
4.5
log(so)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com