Multiple Coherence Pathways - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Multiple Coherence Pathways

Description:

flip angle (degrees) fraction. Fractional components in arbitrary RF pulse ... What do Fn, Fn*, Zn represent? ... Fn = Fn-1 cos2( /2) Fn* sin2( /2) Zn sin ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: karlam8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multiple Coherence Pathways


1
Multiple Coherence Pathways
2
Simple spin echo
spin echo
90y
180x
d
a
b
c
3
Hahn (90-90) and stimulated (90-90-90) echoes
Hennig Fig. 2
4
Repeated flip ?90o
5
Repeated flip ?40o
6
What is an echo?
  • Signal peak (in time) cause by net alignment of
    magnetization
  • Spin echoes perfect alignment of isochromats
  • Any distribution of isochromats is refocused
  • More generally perfect alignment is not required
    to have a peak in signal
  • Hahn, stimulated echoes to not have isochromats
    aligned
  • Magnetization is bunched up on one side of xy
    plane
  • Many echoes require distribution is isochromats
  • Unlike NMR, heavy dephasing (distribution) is the
    norm in MRI
  • MRI insufficient inhomogeneity to maintain
    long-term coherence
  • Instead, use gradients to reliably dephase
    (spoil) and rely on short-term coherences
  • Can we find a representation that is better than
    isochromat vectors?

7
Shortcomings of vector representation
  • Vector representation (e.g., Bloch) Mx My Mz
  • Problems
  • Evolution of magnetization (in absence of RF) has
    2 independent components (transverse
    longitudinal), but vectors have 3
  • Fundamentally treats single isochromats, where
    MRI essentially always encounter distributions
  • This is why echo evolution is so complicated to
    depict using vectors (both temporally and
    spatially)
  • Phase graph representation addresses both of
    these issues

8
Alternate representation of magnetization
  • Problem 1 Evolution of magnetization has 2
    independent components (transverse
    longitudinal), but vectors have 3
  • Replace Mx My Mz
  • With FMxiMy Mz
  • In absence of RF, F and Mz evolve independently
  • relaxation, precession represented by scalar
    multiples
  • no need to worry about coupling between Mx, My

9
Alternate representation of magnetization
  • Problem 1 Evolution of magnetization has 2
    independent components (transverse
    longitudinal), but vectors have 3
  • Replace Mx My Mz
  • With FMxiMy Mz
  • Effect of RF pulse
  • F F cos2(?/2) F sin2(?/2) - i Mz
    sin(?)
  • Mz Mzcos2(?/2) - Mzsin2(?/2) - i (F-F)
    sin(?)

10
Fractional components in arbitrary RF pulse
fraction
flip angle (degrees)
11
Configuration theory (coherence pathways)
  • Problem 2 Vectors fundamentally represent single
    isochromats, where MRI essentially always
    encounter distributions

Mz
Mx
Hennig, Fig 4
Mz
Mx
Hennig, Eqs 8-11
typos in Hennig?
12
Configuration theory (coherence pathways)
What do Fn, Fn, Zn represent? This is just a
useful decomposition of the magnetization (e.g.,
like Fourier decomposition of an
image/object) Decomposition coefficient how
much magnetization expresses this
structure Hennig calls configurations (others
call coherences) Each configuration is a
potential echo (allow it to rephase, signal is
proportional to its coefficient) No mystical
properties (e.g., quantum mechanics not needed)!
Hennig, Fig 4
13
Track flow of magnetization between configurations
phase evolution
exchange between configurations
Echo formation
time
RF pulses
14
Track flow of magnetization between configurations
15
Time evolution of signal dynamics
16
Time evolution of signal dynamics
Differs from previous via starting conditions
(i.e., preparatory pulses)
17
Time evolution of signal dynamics
Differs from first via flip angle
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com