Title: The cosmopolitan nature of culture
1The cosmopolitan nature of culture implications
for creative autonomy in English language
educationAdrian Holliday
2Creative autonomy
- The qualities which students bring with them from
their own worlds outside the classroom - A resource in the classroom rather than something
to be created there - Students making their own space and getting on
with activities in their own terms, perhaps out
of sight of the teacher - Part of the fabric of behaviour that exists in
all societies - Can contributing to and enrich cultural practices
anywhere
3But ... two conflicting pictures
Non-essentialist Cosmopolitanist Values and
behaviour have a large universal element ... are
in dialogue with national structures (Confucianism
is an important cultural resource)
Essentialist Values and behaviour are defined by
national cultures (Confucianism is constructed as
defining and confining)
Periphery
Centre
4Aspects of cultural reality
Negotiating individual vs. social structure
Particular cultural products
Underlying universal cultural processes
Particular social political structures
v Artefacts Literature, art etc Social practices
iv Small culture formation Personal
membership Group cohesion discourses Social
construction Imagining Self Other
i Cultural resources Nation, religion, ideology
etc
iii Personal trajectories Family, ancestries,
careers etc
vi Statements about culture Cultural acts
outward expressions of Self Other
ii Global position politics
Confirming or resisting social structure
5Implications for English language education
- Students bring with them the basic tools to
understand and operate in widely diverse cultural
settings but often hidden - Includes creative autonomy
- Underlying cultural competence underlying
communicative competence - English is a conduit for carrying cultural
abilities to other places
6But ... two conflicting pictures of English
Non-essentialist Cosmopolitanist Can appropriate
multiple cultural realities (texts to be analysed
and deconstructed)
Essentialist Defined and confined by national
culture (e.g. how to greet and say thank you)
7References
- Breen, M. P., Mann, S. (1997). Shooting arrows
at the sun perspectives on a pedagogy for
autonomy. In Benson, P. Voller, P. (Eds.),
Autonomy and independence in language learning.
London Addison and Wesley Longman 132-49. - Grimshaw, T. (2007). Problematizing the construct
of 'the Chinese learner' insights from
ethnographic research. Educational Studies 33
299-311. - Holliday, A. R. (2003). Social autonomy
addressing the dangers of culturism in TESOL. In
Palfreyman, D. Smith, R. (Eds.), Autonomy
across cultures. London Palgrave 110-26. - Holliday, A. R. (2005). The struggle to teach
English as an international language. Oxford
Oxford University Press. - Holliday, A. R. (in press). Complexity in
cultural identity. Language and Intercultural
Communication. - Holliday, A. R. (forthcoming). Intercultural
communication and ideology. London Sage. - Tong, W. M. (2002). Filial piety A barrier or
a resource? A qualitative case study of English
classroom culture in Hong Kong secondary schools.
Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of English and
Language Studies, Canterbury Christ Church
University, Canterbury.