Title: Eyewitness Identification
1(No Transcript)
2Eyewitness Identification
- Steven E. Clark
- University of California, Riverside
3Lineup 1
3
2
1
4
5
6
4Lineup 2
2
3
1
4
5
6
5Target Present(Suspect is Guilty)
3
2
1
4
5
6
6Target Absent(Suspect is Innocent)
2
3
1
4
5
6
7 TARGET TARGET PRESENT ABSENT
Suspect .45 .30 Foil .35 .55 No
ID .20 .15
8TARGET PRESENT (suspect is guilty)
STAGED CRIME
TARGET ABSENT (suspect is innocent)
9Why not study real crimes?
RONALD COTTON
BOBBY POOLE
10(No Transcript)
11Of the 235 DNA Exonerations on the
InnocenceProject website 75 percent were
convicted based on Mistaken Identification
12Why do witnesses make mistakes?
- Memory isnt perfect.
- Lineup composition.
- Expectations and instructions.
- Police influence.
- The way witnesses make decisions
13Why do witnesses make mistakes?
- Clark and Godfrey (2009)
- Meta-analysis of dozens of eyewitness
identification experiments, involving hundreds
(probably thousands) of experimental witnesses. - Problems and solutions
14Lineup Composition
- Problem. Foils that dont match the witnesss
description of the perpetrator
CORRECT .72
FALSE .49
- Solution. Foils that do
- match the witnesss description of the
perpetrator
CORRECT .61
FALSE .21
15Expectations Instructions
- Problem. Witness expects perpetrator to be in
lineup (or is told this by police)
CORRECT .55
FALSE .10
CORRECT .50
FALSE .06
- Solution. Witness is informed that the
perpetrator may or may not be in the lineup
16Police Influence
- Problem. Police officer influences witness while
looking at lineup.
CORRECT .78
FALSE .36
CORRECT .36
FALSE .14
- Solution. Police officer does not influence
witness while looking at lineup.
17Decision-Making
18Decision Making
2
3
1
4
5
6
19Sequential Lineup
- Rod Lindsay and Gary Wells (1985)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Decision-Making
- Problem. Witness makes decision based on relative
judgment. (Simultaneous)
CORRECT .54
FALSE .17
CORRECT .43
FALSE .10
- Solution. Witness does not make decision based on
relative judgment (Sequential)
25Summary
- Research has revealed a lot about why witnesses
make false identifications. - Research has led to recommendations about how to
conduct identification procedures so as to reduce
false identifications.
26Summary
- The recommended procedures work.
- They do reduce the risk of false identifications.
- However, they also reduce the rate of correct
identifications. - This has been underappreciated in the research
literature. - Herein lies the controversy.
- Protecting the innocent is not free.
27From Sam Gross et al. Exonerations in the U.S
1989 - 2003