An Overview of CurriculumBased EvaluationReading - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 85
About This Presentation
Title:

An Overview of CurriculumBased EvaluationReading

Description:

Marilyn Jager Adams (1990) The ... Marilyn Jaeger Adams, Barbara R. Foorman, Ingvar Lundberg, and Terri Beeler ... Joseph K. Torgesen & Bryan R. Bryant. AGS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 86
Provided by: sue8163
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Overview of CurriculumBased EvaluationReading


1
An Overview of Curriculum-Based EvaluationReading
  • Based on the book,
  • Curriculum-Based Evaluation Teaching and
    Decision Making by Howell, Fox, and Morehead

Special thanks to Kerry Bollman and NSSED
  • 2/15/05
  • LADSE
  • Institute Day
  • Presented by Sue Gallagher Barb Curl

2
Problem Analysis of Reading
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
A.K.A. How to figure out what is going on
here...
75
50
25
0
-25
FALL 02-03 Words Read Correctly
3
By the end of this session, you will
  • Have a framework for systematic problem analysis
    in reading
  • Have introductory knowledge of evidence-based
    interventions targeting the 5 big areas of reading

4
Background
  • What is assessment?
  • Focused and meaningful assessment
  • Moving from least intrusive to most intrusive

5
Convergent Data
  • Reality check - Are these scores consistent with
    what I would have predicted?
  • Seek out convergent data - What additional data
    is available that supports this finding?
  • Rule of thumb you want at least two pieces of
    convergent data to confirm a problem
  • Examples permanent products, observations of
    reading, teacher interview, past teacher reports

6
Sources of Convergent Data
7
What is CBE?
  • Problem analysis
  • Survey level assessment
  • Specific level assessment
  • Assessment linked to intervention

8
Problem Analysis
  • Question Why is the problem occurring?
  • A. Review RIOT data, and collect any additional
    RIOT data you need to
  • B. Differentiate between skill problem and
    performance problem (e.g., cant do vs. wont
    do).
  • C. Determine situations in which the problem
    behavior is most likely and least likely to
    occur.
  • D. Generate hypotheses for why a problem is
    occurring considering multiple factors.
  • E. Narrow down to the most validated and
    alterable hypothesis.

9
Steps of Problem-Solving
2. Problem Analysis
1. Problem Identification
5. Plan Evaluation
3. Plan Development
4. Plan Implementation
10
When will you do CBE?
  • Universal screening data shows a problem
  • Classroom teacher has tried some interventions
  • Student is still not making progress
  • You need a more careful problem analysis
  • TO DESIGN AN INTERVENTION

11
(No Transcript)
12
What Students Need...
  • Universal Interventions
  • Are what we do for and with all students
  • Risk status is not considered
  • Selected Interventions
  • Are what we do for some students
  • At-risk status is identified for small groups
  • Intensive Interventions
  • Are what we do for a few students
  • High-risk status is identified for individuals

13
Analysis of Reading Concerns
  • Understanding the components of reading
  • Four major research syntheses
  • Marilyn Jager Adams (1990)
  • The National Research Council (1998)
  • National Reading Panel Report (2000)
  • Shaywitz (2003)

14
Five Big Ideas of Reading
  • Text Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Phonics
  • Phonemic Awareness

15
Comprehension
Vocabulary
Fluency
Phonics
Phonemic Awareness
16
Five Big Ideas of Reading
  • Text Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Phonics
  • Phonemic Awareness

17
  • Phonemic Awareness
  • Ability to hear, identify, and manipulate
    individual sounds (phonemes) in spoken words
  • Improves childrens word reading, reading
    comprehension, and spelling

18
Importance of Phonemic Awareness in Early Literacy
  • One of the most compelling and well-established
    findings in the research on beginning reading is
    the important relationship between phonemic
    awareness and reading acquisition (Kaneenui,
    1997)

19
Phonological Awareness is a broad term that
includes phonemic awareness. In addition to
phonemes, phonological awareness activities can
involve work with sound identification and
localization, sentences, compound words, and
syllables, (CIERA, 2001)
Phonemic Awareness vs. Phonological Awareness
20
  • Phonics
  • Understanding of the relationships between the
    letters (graphemes) of written language and the
    individual sounds (phonemes) of spoken language
    (alphabetic principle)
  • The ability to associate sounds with letters and
    use these sounds to form words.
  • Improves word recognition, spelling, and
    comprehension.

21
Phonemic Awareness vs. Phonics An Important
Distinction
  • Phonemic awareness is not phonics
  • Phonemic awareness is auditory and does not
    involve words in print.

22
  • Fluency
  • The effortless automatic ability to read words in
    connected text.
  • The ability to read a text accurately and
    quickly. Fluent readers read aloud effortlessly
    and with expression.
  • Fluent reading frees students to understand what
    they read.

23
  • Vocabulary
  • The ability to understand (receptive) and use
    (expressive)words to acquire and convey meaning.
  • Knowledge of specific word meaning in text.
  • Necessary for text comprehension.

24
  • Comprehension
  • The complex cognitive process involving the
    intentional interaction between reader and text
    to convey meaning.
  • The ability to understand or gain meaning from
    text.
  • This is the reason for reading!

25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Question
How will you determine whether the student
demonstrates acceptable reading rate, accuracy,
and comprehension?
28
Northern Suburban Special Education District
29
Northern Suburban Special Education District
30
Northern Suburban Special Education District
31
Questions?
  • How do you conduct a survey-level assessment?
  • What are acceptable rates of reading?

32
Northern Suburban Special Education District
33
Further Analysis in Early Literacy Skills
  • Blending, Segmenting and Manipulating of
  • Phonemes
  • Syllables
  • Words
  • Identifying
  • Initial, Medial, Final sounds
  • Rhyming
  • Concepts of print
  • Page Conventions
  • Word/Sentence/Book Length Boundaries
  • Environmental Print/Logos

34
  • Determine if the student can blend, segment, or
    manipulate sounds at any level
  • Blending
  • Im going to say a word. It will be in parts. I
    want you to put the parts back together to make a
    word. For example /sh//i/ is shy.
  • Segmenting
  • I am going to tell you a word. I want you to
    tell me all the
  • sounds you hear in the word. For example, the
    sounds in fat are /f//a/ /t/
  • Manipulating (Deletion)
  • I am going to say a word and then ask you to say
    what word would be left if you took off a sound.
    For example, what word would be left if I said
    cat without the /k/?

35
Supplemental Research Based Reading Interventions
  • PHONEMIC AWARENESS
  • Ladders to Literacy (1)
  • Phonemic Awareness in Young Children (2)
  • Phonological Awareness Training for Children (3)
  • Earobics (4)
  • KPALS
  • 1st Gr. PALS (5)
  • Great Leaps- K-2 (6)
  • PHONICS
  • ?KPALS
  • ?Great Leaps- Gr. K-2 Gr. 3-6
  • ?REWARDS (7)
  • FLUENCY
  • ?1st Gr. PALS
  • ?PALS- Gr. 2-6
  • ?Repeated Readings (8)
  • ?Partner Reading (9)
  • ?Great Leaps Gr. 3-6
  • ?Repeated Phrases (10)

36
Five Big Ideas of Reading
  • Text Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Phonics
  • Phonemic Awareness

37
Phonological Awareness Activities
Phoneme blending segmentation
more complex
Onset rime segmentation blending
Syllable segmentation blending
  • CURRICULA/PROGRAMS
  • Early Reading Intervention
  • PALS (K First)
  • Ladders to Literacy
  • Phonemic Awareness in Young Children
  • Phonological Awareness Training for Reading
  • Road to the Code
  • Sound Partners
  • Stepping Stones to Literacy

Sentence segmentation
Rhyming song
less complex
38
Ladders to Literacy A Kindergarten Activity Book
(1)
Rollanda E. OConnor, Angela Notari-Syverson,
Patricia F. Vadasy
Author(s)
Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company
Publisher
Ladders to Literacy A Kindergarten Activity Book
contains activities which help children develop
the following critical early literacy skills
print awareness, phonological awareness and oral
language. Guidelines for adapting an activity
are provided so children with diverse learning
needs can participate and learn. These
activities can be integrated into established
teaching routines and are appropriate for large
or center-based teaching arrangements. Home
links are provided to help parents reinforce the
concepts/skills children learn at school.
Specific training is not necessary.
Description Training
39
Phonemic Awareness in Young Children (2)
40
Phonological Awareness Training for Reading (3)
41
Other Phonemic Awareness Interventions
  • EAROBICS (4)
  • KPALS
  • 1ST GRADE PALS (5)
  • GREAT LEAPS (6)

42
Northern Suburban Special Education District
43
Five Big Ideas of Reading
  • Text Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Phonics
  • Phonemic Awareness

44
Fluency(8)
From Lovitt, T. C. (1995). Tactics for Teaching
(2nd Edition). ColumbusMerrill.
45
Partner Reading (9)
From Anita Archer (many peer-mediated
arrangements use a form of this procedure)
  • Using this procedure, the reader and the coach
    will sit side-by-side with one book between
    them.
  • The reader will
  • Read a paragraph, a page, or will read for a
    given amount of time.
  • Touch under the words and whisper-read.
  • The coach will
  • Encourage and support the reader.
  • If the reader asks for a word, the coach will say
    the word.
  • If the reader makes a mistake, the coach will
    correct the error using the following steps
  • Point to the word and say, Can you figure out
    this work?
  • If the reader can not figure out the word in five
    seconds, say, This word is _____________.
  • Have the reader repeat the word and reread the
    sentence.
  • With very young children or children with special
    needs, have the coach read under the words.
  • If you select to have students sit lap to lap
    so they can have eye contact and answer each
    others questions, each student will need a book.
  • If you have a student who is not an accurate or
    fluent reader and reads below the grade level of
    the material, the following alternatives can be
    used
  • Same material Have higher reader read first.
    Then have the lower reader read the same
    material.
  • Choral partner reading The partners read
    together.
  • Triad Place the low reader in a triad. Have
    one 1 and two 2s. Have the 2s read
    chorally.

46
Another Fluency Building Intervention
  • REPEATED PHRASES (10)

47
Northern Suburban Special Education District
48
Determine if student has skills to correct errors
using the pencil tap test (assisted
monitoring)Whenever you make an error, Im
going to tap the table with my pen. When I tap
the table, I want you to fix the error.
  • If student can fix errors when you point them
    out, you know he/she has the decoding skills to
    read the passage, but needs assistance learning
    to self-monitor for accuracy. Intervene with
    self-monitoring strategies.
  • If the student cannot fix errors when you point
    them out, a skill deficit in decoding may be
    indicated. Further analyze errors to isolate
    patterns of difficulty, and intervene with
    targeted decoding strategies.

49
Rachel Pencil Tap Test
  • Becky didnt want to go to sleep. She tried as
    hard as she
  • could to stay awake. She knew that if she fell
    asleep, she
  • would miss seeing Santa Claus. Becky thought
    that the
  • old man with whiskers was wonderful. In all her
    books,
  • he appeared so jolly and kind. Some of the
    students in
  • Beckys kindergarten class said that Santa was
    just a fairy
  • tale. Janie was one of Beckys friends. She was
    a sassy
  • little girl with red hair. She said that parents
    try to make
  • kids believe in Santa so they behave. She
    thought Santa
  • was a big trick. Becky didnt believe Janie.
    Santa was a
  • real person, and tonight...

50
Rachels Results
  • 113 WRC, 13 errors
  • Given pencil tap cue, Rachel self-corrects 3 of
    her errors, but needs more assistance to correct
    the other 10
  • Conclusion This is not a helpful strategy for
    Rachel ...

51
Rachels Results
  • Table tapping was not helpful for Rachel.
  • What if it were?
  • Heres an example of a self-monitoring strategy
    -

52
Accuracy(11)
From Kerry Bollman
53
Northern Suburban Special Education District
54
Analyzing Errors in Reading
  • Review existing data to determine if errors
    violate meaning
  • Example text
  • They are such smiling happy girls.
  • Meaning preserving error
  • They are such smiley happy girls.
  • Meaning violating error
  • They are such smelling happy girls.

55
Error Analysis
  • Review miscues or errors and look for patterns
  • Accuracy
  • Mispronunciations (clusters, digraphs, prefixes,
    suffixes etc.)
  • Insertions
  • Omissions
  • Fluency/Automaticity
  • Repetition
  • Hesitations
  • Prosodic Features of Text
  • Punctuation
  • Intonation

56
What Error Pattern Exists Here?
  • Becky didnt want to go to sleep. She tried as
    hard as she
  • could to stay awake. She knew that if she fell
    asleep, she
  • would miss seeing Santa Claus. Becky thought
    that the
  • old man with whiskers was wonderful. In all her
    books,
  • he appeared so jolly and kind. Some of the
    students in
  • Beckys kindergarten class said that Santa was
    just a fairy
  • tale. Janie was one of Beckys friends. She was
    a sassy
  • little girl with red hair. She said that parents
    try to make
  • kids believe in Santa so they behave. She
    thought Santa
  • was a big trick. Becky didnt believe Janie.
    Santa was a
  • real person, and tonight...

57
Five Big Ideas of Reading
  • Text Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Phonics
  • Phonemic Awareness

58
Phonics Interventions
  • KPALS, 1st Gr. PALS
  • GREAT LEAPS K-2, GR. 3-5
  • REWARDS (7)

59
Great Leaps Reading Program (6)
Kenneth U. Campbell
Author(s)
Diarmuid, Incorporated
Publisher
The Great Leaps Reading Program is a
supplementary reading tutorial program for
students in kindergarten through grade 12. The
purpose of the program is to develop automaticity
through repeated oral readings in phonics, sight
phrases, and one-page short stories. The program
incorporates the use of a charting system, so
learners can see their progress. Instructions
for use of the program are included in each Great
Leaps binder. These instructions are sufficient
for program implementation however, qualified
trainers are available in many parts of the
country.
Description Training
60
Northern Suburban Special Education District
61
Tools for Further Analysis of Comprehension
  • Question Development
  • Maze/Cloze
  • Oral Retell

62
Further Analysis of Comprehension Skills
  • Prior to reading, can the student
  • Activate prior knowledge on a given topic
  • Develop questions or make plausible predictions
    for text
  • While reading, can the student
  • Attend to prosodic features of text
  • Adjust reading pace to difficulty level
  • Self correct meaning violating miscues
  • After reading can the student
  • Summarize text
  • Answer explicit and/or implicit questions
    regarding text

63
  • Determine in which aspects of reading
  • comprehension a student struggling
  • Reading Comprehension Survey
  • Is the student an active reader?
  • Does the student monitor meaning?
  • Does the student adjust for task difficulty?
  • Does this student connect text to prior
    knowledge?
  • Does the student clarify?
  • Does the student have adequate decoding skills?
  • Does the student know needed vocabulary?
  • Does the student use proper syntax?
  • Does the student have adequate prior knowledge?

64
Five Big Ideas of Reading
  • Text Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Phonics
  • Phonemic Awareness

65
Vocabulary Strategies
  • Definition Plus From Anita Archer
  • Vocabulary for_________________________ Name_____
    ______________________
  • Date____________________________
  • Vocabulary Definition (Critical
    Attributes)
    Sentence/Example/Picture
  • Keyword Strategy from Margo A. Mastropieri
  • Best for Unfamiliar Vocabulary
  • Recode unfamiliar word to a acoutically similar
    but familiar word or keyword
  • Relate the keyword in an interactive picture with
    the to-be-remembered information
  • Retrieve the new definition by thinking of the
    keyword and what was happening in the interactive
    picture.
  • lago lake (log)

66
Other Vocabulary Interventions
  • FLIP-A-CHIP VOCABULARY BUILDING (12)
  • WORD BUILDING INTERVENTION (13)
  • BRINGING WORDS TO LIFE ROBUST VOCABULARY
    INSTRUCTION (14)

67
Five Big Ideas of Reading
  • Text Comprehension
  • Vocabulary
  • Fluency
  • Phonics
  • Phonemic Awareness

68
Comprehension
  • Teaching specific comprehension strategies
    improves comprehension
  • Promotes understanding
  • Helps to remember
  • Helps communicate
  • Six Strategies
  • Monitoring comprehension
  • Graphic organizers
  • Answering questions
  • Generating questions
  • Recognizing story structure
  • Summarizing
  • Making use of prior knowledge and mental
    imagery have some research support

69
The METACOGNITION part of Comprehension
  • Metacognition is the awareness of ones own
    thinking. It involves the recognition when one
    doesnt understand, and the awareness of being
    able to regulate ones own thinking - to shift
    strategies when needed.
  • Research is now documenting (Flavell) that
    metacognition is an important and critical
    process of reading comprehension.

70
Looking Beneath the SurfaceMetacognition
  • What is a key, underlying component to reading
    comprehension?
  • Being aware of your own thoughts while you read
    and knowing whether or not you are grasping the
    meaning.

71
Comprehension(15)
72
Other Comprehension Interventions
  • FROM CLUNK TO CLICK COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC
    READING (16)
  • PALS- GR. 2-6 (17)

73
Discuss with your neighbor
  • Do we understand when and how to use
  • Comprehension Survey
  • Pencil Tap Test
  • Miscue Analysis
  • Re-Reading
  • Survey-Level Assessment

74
Discuss with your neighbor
  • Do we understand when and how to use
  • Comprehension Survey rate accuracy
  • Pencil Tap Test rate accuracy -
  • Miscue Analysis accuracy - self corrects -
  • Re-Reading rate - accuracy
  • Survey-Level Assessment rate - accuracy -

75
Case Studies
76
Case Example Ellie, Grade 4
  • Review
  • Report card history indicates difficulty in
    reading
  • Participated in High Flyers reading support
    group in 1st and 2nd grades
  • Low scores on current reading comprehension class
    work
  • Interview
  • Ellie reports she is an ok reader, but doesnt
    remember what she reads
  • Observe
  • Test
  • Fall Reading CBM Scores
  • Grade 4 text - 61 WRC, 10 errors
  • 50th percentile scores 131 WRC, 3 errors

77
Case Example Bart, Grade 2
  • Review
  • No previous reading services, no teacher comments
    on past report cards regarding reading.
  • Interview
  • Parents havent noticed a concern, and note that
    Bart never chooses to read at home
  • Teacher states that Bart successfully uses
    decoding strategies
  • Observe
  • Bart during a round robin reading activity in
    class. Bart self corrects all but 1 error across
    3 paragraphs he reads.
  • Test
  • Fall Reading CBM Scores
  • 48 WRC, 1 error
  • 50th percentile 77 WRC, 2 errors

78
Case Example Jack, Grade 5
  • Review
  • Past testing indicates adequate listening
    comprehension skills
  • Interview
  • Teacher reports that Jack does not seem to
    remember anything that he reads
  • Observe
  • When Jack reads in class, it sounds very
    mechanical and unnatural
  • Test
  • Fall CBM Scores
  • 160, 4 errors
  • 50th percentile 142, 1 error

79
Case Example Rachel, Grade 3
  • Review
  • Old DIBELS data never met criteria for Nonsense
    Word Fluency (sim/lut)
  • Report card comments star reader in grade 1
  • Has received speech therapy since 3 years old
  • Interview
  • 2nd grade teacher noted that Rachel liked to be a
    good fast reader.
  • Observe
  • Test
  • Fall CBM Scores
  • 107 WRC, 11 errors
  • 50th percentile 102 WRC, 3 errors

80
Case Example Henry, Grade 1
  • (R) Previous records
  • Kindergarten screening results appeared normal
  • Teacher comments on report card indicate
    difficulty with letter identification (end of
    year had 16 letters mastered), but note good
    rhyming skills
  • (I) Teacher
  • Henry currently receives 30 minutes/day
    systematic phonics instruction based on word
    families
  • (O) Henry in class
  • On task time during teacher led instruction and
    independent seat work is commensurate with peers
  • (T) Fall DIBELS Scores
  • LNF 18, PSF 48, NWF 1
  • Criterion for Fall PSF gt 35, Winter NWF gt
    50
  • 50th percentile scores LNF 42, PSF 36, NWF
    27

81
Case Example Carly Kindergarten
  • Review
  • Carly did not recognize any letters at her Fall
    Kindergarten screening
  • Interview
  • Teacher notes that Carlys class has been working
    on various literacy activities with one new
    letter per week for 30 minutes per day since the
    beginning of the school year.
  • Observe
  • Test
  • Winter Kindergarten screening update
  • Carly does not recognize any letters

82
Other Information in Packet
  • MATRIX OF SUPPLEMENTAL READING INTERVENTIONS,
    ADDRESSING THE FIVE BIG AREAS OF READING A
    STANDARD PROTOCOL APPROACH (18)
  • SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENTAL INTERVENTIONS FROM
    FLORIDA RESEARCH CENTER
  • INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING FORM (21)

83
Resources (20
  • Web Sites
  • www.nationalreading panel.org www.texasreading.or
    g http//dibels.uoregon.org
  • http//reading.uoregon.edu http//idea.uoregon.ed
    u http//idea.uoregon.edu16080/ncite
  • http//oregonreadingfirst.uoregon www.fcrr.org
    www.readingrockets.org
  • www.interventioncentral.org www.aimsweb.com www.
    ku-crl.org
  • http//kc.vanderbilt.edu/kennedy/pals/ http//curr
    y.eduschool.virginia.edu/go/readquest/strat/
  • Books
  • Howell, K. W. Nolet, V. (2000).
    Curriculum-Based Evaluation Teaching and
    Decision Making. Belmont, CAWadsworth/Thomson
    Learning.
  • Flugum, K., Hagen, J. , Kurns, S., Robinson,
    W. (1996). Curriculum-Based Evaluation Reading.
    Johnston, IA Heartland Area Education Agency
    11.
  • Lovitt, T. C. (1995). Tactics for Teaching.
    Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall, Inc.
  • Beck, I. L. 7 McKeown, M. G. (2002). Bringing
    Words to Life Robust Vocabulary Instruction.
    Guilford Publications, Inc.

84
Curricula/Programs Archer, A. Gleason, M.
Skills for School Success. North Billerica, MA
Curriculum Associates, Inc. Archer, A. Gleason,
M. Advanced Skills for School Success. North
Billerica, MA Curriculum Associates,
Inc. Archer, A., Gleason, M. Vachon. Rewards.
Longmont, COSopris West. Archer, A., Gleason, M.
Vachon. Rewards Plus. Longmont, COSopris
West. Sprick, M., Jones, S. V., Dunn, R.,Gunn, B.
Read Well Level K. Longmont, COSopris
West. Sprick, M., Howard, L. Fidanque, A. Read
Well Level One. Longmont, COSopris West. Fuchs,
Mathes, Fuchs. Peer-Assisted Learning PALS.
Vanderbilt University Klingner, J. K., Vaugh, S.,
Dimino, J., Schumm, J. S. Bryant, D.
Collaborative Strategic Reading Strategies for
Improving Instruction. Longmont, COSopris
West. Greenwood, C., Delquadri, J. C., Carta, J.
Together We Can. Longmont, COSopris West. Beck,
R., Anderson, P., Conrad, D. One-Minute
Fluency Builders. Longmont, COSopris
West Simmons, D. C. Kameenui, E. J. Early
Reading Intervention. Scott Foresman University
of Kansas Strategic Instruction Model, Lawrence,
KS Campbell, K. U. Great Leaps for Reading.
Diamuid, Inc.
85
Thank you!
Thank you!
Thank you!
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com