Title: Emerging Diseases: A New Strain of Toxigenic C' difficile
1Emerging Diseases A New Strain of Toxigenic C.
difficile
- Presented for the Association of Professionals
in Infection Control (APIC) by Elizabeth Race
M.D. Associate Professor of Infectious Disease - University of Texas
2Clostridium difficile
- A gram anaerobic spore forming bacillus
associated with nosocomial diarrhea as well as
the more severe (potentially fatal)
pseudomembranous colitis - Studies dating back to the 1970s highlighted the
role of two toxins, A B, in the pathogenesis of
C. difficile associated disease (CDAD) - Health care associated transmission occurs
primarily due to environmental contamination with
C. diff spores - Major risk factor is exposure to antimicrobial
agents to which the strain of c. diff is
resistant, creating selective pressure favoring
emergence of CDAD
3In its spore form, C. difficile can withstand
drying and heat, and is resistant to
disinfectants. The spores can survive up to five
months in the environment. C. difficile has been
cultured in rooms of infected individuals up to
40 days post discharge. (Patient Safety
Advisory, Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting
Systems, June 2005)
4Mode of Transmission C. difficile is shed in
feces. Any surface, device or material that
becomes contaminated with feces may serve as a
reservoir for C. difficile spores. C. difficile
spores are transferred to patients mainly via the
hands of health care personnel who have touched a
contaminated surface or item. (CDC Fact Sheet -
Information for Health Care Providers).
5Cleaning Protocol OMH March 2006
- Emphasis on timely contact precautions for
patients with diarrhea - Daily cleaning of all contact precautions rooms
housing pt suspected of or diagnosed with CDAD - EPA disinfectant approved for hospitals
- One swipe of all high touch surfaces with a 110
sodium hypochlorite (bleach) and H2O solution - Bedrails, call bell, telephone, TV remote,
over-bed table, bathroom door knob, water
faucets, light switch, commodes and flush handle
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8 - Guiac Cards
- Fecal Occult blood
- Useful Screening test or satanic ritual?
9New, Epidemic, Multiple Toxin Strain of C. diff
- Epidemic strain in Ohio confirmed by Centers for
Disease Control (CDC) - Certain C. diff strains have the propensity to
cause multistate outbreaks , these are usually
multi-drug resistant strains - Rates of severe disease and mortality have
historically been lt 3, but with emergence of
newer strains of C. diff (possibly imported from
Canada) the mortality rate appears to be rising - Each episode of CDAD has been estimated to cost gt
3600. With a total U.S. cost of gt one billion - McDonald CL, et al. An epidemic toxin
gene-variant strain of C. difficile. nEJM 2005
353 2433-41
10Both the rate and severity of C. difficile
colitis is increasing
- NNIS data collection noted upsurge in CDAD rates
from late 1980 through 2001 - Between 2000 and 2001, a 26 increase was noted
in proportion of patients discharged from
non-federal U.S. hospitals with CDAD - Between 2000 and 2001, Univ. of Pittsburgh noted
a doubling of CDAD rate as compared to prior 10
years - 26 patients with CDAD required colectomy and 18
patients died - McDonald Cl, et al. An Epidemic gene-variant
strain of C. difficile. NEJM 2005, 353 2433-41
11Increased Severity of CDAD
- Rates increased from 0.68 to 1.2
- Life threatening disease increased from 1.6 to
3.2 - 44 colectomies and 20 deaths
- Dallal RM et al. Pittsburgh, PA 2000
- Cases rose by gt 30 over previous 10 years
- Overall mortality 15.3 up from 3.5
- Disease particularly severe in transplant
recipients - Morris AM et al. Portland, OR 1994 - 2000
12 Reasons for Increased CDAD Incidence and Severity
- Changes in underlying host susceptibility
- Changes in antimicrobial prescribing
- New strain with increased virulence
- Changes in infection control practice
13Those over 65 suffer an increasingly large burden
of CDAD and mortalityProportion of U.S.
Acute-care Hospital discharges with C. diff
listed as any diagnosis by age
14Host defenses against diarrheal disease versus
Microbial virulence traits
- Hygiene
- Gastric acid
- Mucus
- Immunity
- Motility
- Flora
- Adherence
- Enterotoxin
- Cytotoxin
- Invasiveness
- Penetration
- Ability to penetrate normal or abnormal mucosal
lining
15(No Transcript)
16Guiac The tao of Poo
17Pathogenesis
- Alteration of fecal flora
- Antibiotics esp. broad spectrum or drugs with
enhanced anti-aerobic activity - Anti-neoplastics or immunosuppressants
- Colonic colonization with toxigenic C. difficile
associated with - GI surgery, feeding tubes, stool softeners, GI
stimulants, antiperistaltics, antacids, enemas.
(proton pump inhibitors do ? risk but not as
risky as surgery or antibiotics - Advanced age and severe underlying illness
- Toxin A deficient strain may cause disease
- Growth of organism with elaboration of toxin
- Further alteration of fecal flora .antibiotics
18Normal Inhabitants of Healthy GI tract
- Normal Colonic Flora
- Anaerobes
- Bacterioides fragilis
- Clostridium
- Peptostreptococcus
- Peptococcus
- Others
- Aerobes
- Escheria coli
- Klebsiella
- Proteus
- others
- Organisms/ g feces
- 10 ¹¹
-
- 108
- 10 5-7
- 10 5-7
- 10 5-7
-Mandell Infectious Diseases
19The frequency of C. diff acquisition in the
hospital is directly proportional to the length
of stay
Johnson and Gerding J Infect Dis. 1998 26 1027
- 36
20Antimicrobial Agents Historically Associated with
CDAD
Infrequent
Rare
Frequent
Parenteral aminoglycosides Bacitracin Metronidazol
e Vancomycin
Ampicillin Amoxicillin Cephalosporins Clindamycin
Tetracyclines Sulfonamides Erythromycin Chloramphe
nicol Trimethoprim Quinilones
With new strains
Mandell Infectious Diseases
21Pathogenicity
- Human disease ranges from asymptomatic
colonization to - Diarrhea
- Pseudomembranous colitis
- Toxic megacolon
- Death
22- Disease caused by 2 toxins, Toxin A (an
enterotoxin) and Toxin B (a cytotoxin) - Pathogenicity is genetically located in a
pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) of 5 genes - In general, C. diff strains either possess the
entire PaLoc and are toxigenic, or lack the PaLoc
and are non-toxigenic (and do not cause disease) - A few strains possess atypical or variant toxin A
or B genes (and are able to cause human CDAD and
PMC) - Binary toxin may also be present, but its
clinical significance was unknown - New with Canadian strain
- Appears to be causing the increased morbidity and
mortality of CDAD
23A New, Multiple Toxin-Positive Strain of C. diff
- McDonald examined 187 C. diff strains from 6
states (GA, IL, ME, NJ, OR, PA) obtained during
2000-3 outbreaks - Compared them with a database of over 6000
historical strains - Described the dominant strain Restriction
Endonuclease Analysis (REA) Group B1 North
American PFGE type 1 (NAP1) toxinotype III pos
for binary toxin CDT with an 18bp tcdC deletion
(B1/NAP1) - Pan quinilone- resistant
- McDonald CL, et al. An epidemic gene-variant
strain of C. difficile. NEJM 2005 353-2433-41.
24Clinical Manifestation
- Incubation period
- Unknown, disease onset 1 day to 6 weeks following
antibiotic exposure - Watery diarrhea, lower abdominal pain, fever,
leukocytosis (elevated WBC) - Pseudomembranous colitis
- Toxic megacolon
- Perforation, peritonitis
- Death in 24 38
- Especially if surgical consult not obtained early
25Leukocytosis and CDAD
- Toxin A is a potent neutrophil chemo attractant
- In a case control study of 109 patients with
CDAD, 50 had WBC gt 10,000/mm³ - (Arch Int Med 1986 146 95-100)
- Mean WBC 15,800 in 35 CDAD patients vs. 7,700 in
controls (Am J Gastroenterology 2000 95 3023) - CDAD was found in 16 of patients with WBC gt
15,00/mm³ and 25 of patients with WBC gt 30,000
mm³ (Clin Infect Dis 2002 34 1585 92) - 58 of 60 patients with unexplained WBC gt 15,000
had C. diff toxin in stool
26Recurrent CDAD
- Seen in 5 40 of cases
- Advanced age, severe underlying illness
- Re-exposure to antibiotics
- More likely in those who do not mount antibody
response during initial therapy - Up to half may be re-infection not recurrence
- True recurrences
- Likely due to intra-luminal persistence of spores
27Diagnosis of CDAD
- CDAD Case Definition
- Diarrhea
- gt 6 watery stools over 36 hours or gt 8 over 48
hours - Pseudomembranes seen on endoscopy
- OR
- Diagnostic test for toxin producing org
- In a situation when there is no other recognized
etiology for diarrhea
28 Guiac cards Anals of Internal Medicine
29C. Diff Diagnostic Tests
30General Principles of Diagnosis of CDAD
- Fecal leukocytes are found in 30 60 of pts
with CDAD it is not helpful to use this test to
screen for which pts to test for CDAD - Patients who develop diarrhea after 3 or more
days of hospitalization, who have received
antimicrobials within 2 months, should be tested
initially only for C. difficile - Testing of asymptomatic patients for C.
difficile, including tests of cure is not
recommended. Cessation of diarrhea and improved
condition during treatment is the goal not
erradication of spores - (Infect Cont Hosp Epid 1995 16 459-477. Ann
Int. Med 1995 123 835- 840)
31Therapeutic Options for CDAD
- Treatment
- Cease offending antimicrobial
- Administer prescription orally
- Nearly all pts respond
- Continue tx for at least 10 days
- Avoid antiperistaltics
- Alternative or multiple administration routes for
ileus or toxic megacolon - Early surgical consultation
32CDAD Primary Treatment
- Metronidazole, 250mg qid or 500mg tid orally x 10
days is preferred - Vancomycin 125 500mg qid orally x 10 days is an
alternative that should be avoided if possible to
reduce risk of vancomycin resistant enterococci
(VRE) in hospitals
33Treatment CDAD and colitis
- Nonspecific measures
- Discontinue or change implicated antimicrobial
- Supportive measures (fluids)
- Avoid antiperistaltic agents
- Contact isolation precautions
- Antimicrobial treatment
- Metronidazole 250mg orally tid x 7 14 days
- Vancomyin 125mg orally qid x 7 14 days
- Metronidazole 500mg IV q 6 hrs (only until oral
agents are tolerated)
34CDAD Recurrence Treatment
- First reccurrence manage again with
metronidazole in same dose and duration as
original episode the majority of pts respond
without further recurrence - For subsequent recurrences, there is no consensus
but - Vanc 125mg qid orally plus rifampin 300mg bid
orally x 10 days - (Buggy et al. J. Clin. Gastroenterology 1987
9155-9)
35Relapse Management CDAD or Colitis
- Spectrum of Treatments
- Metronidazole or vanc po x 10 days followed by
cholestyramine (4 g tid) lactobacilli (as
Lactinel, 1 g po qid) x 3 wks - Vancomycin 125mg po qid x 10 14 days, followed
by vanc 125mg po qod x 3 wks - Vanc 125mg po qid x 4 6 wks, then taper over 4
8 wks - Vanc 125mg po qid, plus rifampin 600mg po q day x
10 14 days
36Relapse management cont
- Vanc 125mg po qid plus Saccharomyces boulardiix x
10-14 days, then S. boulardii for 4 wks - Intravenous gamma globulin 400mg/kg every 3 weeks
(in children) - Rectal instillation of feces (50g fresh stool
from healthy donor in 500ml of saline, delivered
by enema - Broth cultures of bacteria from healthy donors
(stool culture using stool from healthy donor, 10
strains were selected based on in vitro
inhibition of C. difficile grown in broth culture
10 to 9th power/ml 2ml of each mixed in
anaerobic glove box with 180ml saline and given
by enema)
37Relapse management cont
- Lactobacllus G-G, 1 g po qid x 3 wks
38Management of CDAD in the Presence of Severe Ileus
- Vanc orally or via NG 500mg q 6 hrs (discontinue
suction for 45-60 minutes post dose) - Metronidazole 500mg q 6 hrs IV
- Vanc enemas 500mg q 6 hrs in 100cc NS via 18 G
Foley catheter in the rectum 30cc balloon
inflated clamp catheter for 60 min. post dose - 6 of 8 pts responded in 4 17 days
- 2 died, one following colectomy
- (Inf Cont Hosp Epidemiology 199415371-381)
39New and Evolving Therapies
- Ramoplanin
- Developed to eradicate VRE
- Toxin binding
- Tolevamer
- Probiotics
- Stool enemas or living related stool transplants
- Immunoglobulin therapy
- Vaccine under development
40Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy
- Single-blind randomized clinical trial
- 39 inpts with primary episode of CDAD randomized
to receive 10 days of metronidazole vs. 10 days
metronidazole rifampin - 65 on monotherapy improved by day 10 vs. 63 of
pts on combination therapy - Proportion of pts who relapsed similar between
the 2 treatment arms - Lagrotteria D, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2006
43547 - 552
41Infection Prevention and Control Measures
- Contact Isolation precautions
- Empiric
- All incontinent pts with undiagnosed diarrhea
- All pts unable to perform hygiene (washing hands
after bowel movements, or who are incontinent
(children, debilitated, elderly) - All pts diagnosed with CDAD
- Gloves and gowns for all patient contact
- Dedication of pt care equipment
- Antimicrobial restriction
42Infection Prevention and Control Measures cont
- Meticulous hand washing with soap and water NOT
alcohol based hand rub - Upon leaving room and removing gloves
- At least 15 seconds
- Rinse well with warm H2O
- Pat dry
- Use paper towel to shut off faucet
43IPC measures cont
- Private room or cohort
- Room and equipment disinfection
- 110 bleach solution
- Single swipe and throw away
- High touch surfaces
- Commodes implicated
- Endoscopes implicated
- When not properly sterilized
- No reuseable rectal thermometers single use
only
44C. Difficile Iceberg
Infected patients (symptomatic)
Colonized patients
45(No Transcript)
46The same study found that wearing two gowns, one
forwards and one backwords, improved concealment
by up to 60 but made examination and many
procedures difficult.
47Evidence for Measures to Reduce Risk of Diarrhea
- Antimicrobial useage restriction
- Prophylactic treatment of pts receiving atx
- Saccharomycees boulardii
- Lactobacillis species
48Evidence for Measures to Reduce Risk of Diarrhea
49Probiotics for Abx-Associated Diarrhea
- Incidence of abx-assoc diarrhea is 5 25
depending on the series, C. diff responsible for
approx. 24 of abx-assoc diarrhea (and for 90 of
cases of pseudomembraneous colitis) - Placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial
of 193 patients given Saccharomyces boulardii
within 72 hrs of B-lactam abx to prevent diarrhea - Diarrhea developed in only 7.2 of pts given S.
boulardii, vs. 14.6 of pts given placebo - McFarland LV, et al. Am J. Gastroenterology 1995
90439
502006 Guidelines for Probiotic Use in Abx-Assoc.
Diarrhea and CDAD
- Prevention of Abx-Assoc Diarrhea
- Adults S. boulardii 1gm/day
- Strength of evidence good
- Children LGG 1-2 x 10 to the 10th cfu/d
- Strength of Evidence good
- Prevention of CDAD
- No evidence to support primary prevention
- Recurrent CDAD
- Adults S. boulardii 1 gm/ day
- Strength of Evidence good
- Children Insufficient evidence
51Need for Antimicrobial Controls?
- Antimicrobial use restriction is indicated if a
specific antimicrobial , particularly
clindamycin, is identified as a risk for C.
difficile- associated diarrhea in the
institution - - Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
52Newer Antibiotics Role in the Current C.
difficile Epidemic
- Fluroquinolones
- Eradication of Healthy Intestinal Anaerobes
Increases Rates of C. diff colitis and VRE - Gatifloxacin (Tequin) and Moxifloxacin (Avelox)
have markedly greater anaerobic activity than
Levofloxacin or Ciprofloxacin
53Potential for VRE and C. diff Colitis
- Two Major Factors
- Anti anaerobic activity of an antimicrobial agent
- B. fragilis is a normal protective barrier for
the intestinal tract - Fecal concentration of an antimicrobial
- Depends on biliary (intestinal exposure) vs.
of renal excretion - Wistrom, et al. JAC 2001 47 43-50 Donskey, et
al. NEJM 2000 3431925-1932
54Anti-anaerobic Activity of Fluroquinolones
HoellmanApplebaum AAC 1998 422459-2462
Zhanel. Drugs 2002 6213-59
55The Major Modifiable Risk Factor Antibiotic Use
- Limit use of drugs with enhanced anti-anaerobic
activity - Limit duration of all antibiotics to absolute
minimum
56 and with an opposing view, C. difficile,
Legionella, and smallpox.