Title: Research Methods
1Marketing Research
Qualitative Interviewing
2 Problem of Names
- In-depth, intensive, one-to-one, focused,
depth, long, unstructured - Ethnographic, creative, feminist,
post-modern, phenomenological - Many terms seem to refer to the same
phenomenon
3Qualitative Interviews in Marketing Research
- First qualitative interview in MR in 1900
(Locksley,1950) - AMA recommends abandon term depth interview
(Woodward, 1950) - First QMR text describes 4 varieties of interview
(Smith, 1954) - Literature silent on subject until 1980s -
increased interest amongst researchers
4 Variations on a Theme
- Degree of structure
- Location
- Length
- Depth
- Purpose
- Interviewer style
- Relationship between parties
5 Key Issues
- When to use qualitative interview
- How to select respondents
- Developing interview guide
- How to manage the relationship
- How to record interviews
- What kind of analysis
6 Interview as Conversation
- No explicit purpose
- Avoid repetition
- Express interest to keep talk going
- Take turns
- Abbreviation
- Pauses/silences
- Explicit purpose
- Explain purpose recording
- Ask for descriptions explanations
- Encourage contrasts
- Less balanced turns
- Repetition
- Expansion
7 Focus Group
- A number of respondents (participants) convened
by an interviewer to discuss questions or issues
relating to the research topic. - The interviewers role is to facilitate
moderate the discussion and ensure it covers the
key questions issues. - Participants may raise important new
issues/questions.
8Focussed Focus Groups
- Group meets at a central location at
pre-designated time - Consists of an interviewer/moderator
- to introduce the topic encourage group members
to discuss the subject among themselves - Participants may be consumer, business people,
children - Ideally discussion topics emerge from group
- Allows discussion of true feelings, anxieties,
frustrations and expression of depth of
conviction in participants own words
9 How is Focus Group Different?
- Group Interview
- Group Discussion
- Nominal Group
- Conflict Group
- Dialogical Group
- Brainstorming Group
- Intervention Group
- Sensitivity Panel
- Extended Group
- Synetics Group
- Delphi Group
- Commando Group
- Cyberspace Group
- Telephone Group
- Unmoderated Group
- Mini Group
10 Group Vs Individual Interview
- The distinguishing feature of the group is
its groupness - Does this add to the data via the operation of
group dynamics? - Does this contaminate the data via
group dynamics?
11Uses for Focus Groups
- Predominent use is for exploratory research
- Also useful in later stages of a research project
to investigate the meaning of survey results - To assess the effects of social interaction
12Focus Group Approaches
EXPLORATORY
EXPLANATORY
EXPERIENCING
ideas \ hypotheses for further research
explains motives, beliefs
understand everyday world of consumer
testing questions \ scale items
identify causal relationships
examine consumer experience
background research on problem
tapping layers of consciousness
social and cultural aspects of behaviour
explain \ confirm quantitative findings
skilled moderator required
language of consumers
(Source Calder, 1977)
13Types of Knowledge Output
- Everyday knowledge summary of what
participants said - Interpretive knowledge interpretive framework or
theory applied to data - Scientific knowledge hypotheses for
scientific testing from the data
14Group Interviews Advantages - 10 Ss.
- Synergism
- Snowballing
- Simulation
- Security
- Spontaneity
- Serendipity
- Specialisation
- Scientific scrutiny
- Structure
- Speed
(Hess, 1968)
15Group InterviewsDisadvantages - 5Ms
- Misuse
- Misjudge
- Moderation
- Messy
- Misrepresentation
(Malhotra, 1996)
16Group Composition
- Between 6 - 10 is considered ideal
- Homogeneity is an issue
- Researchers wishing to collect information from
different type of people should conduct several
focus groups - Most experts believe 4 focus group sessions can
satisfy needs of exploratory research
17Environmental Conditions
- May take place at the research or advertising
agency/a hotel/or one of the subjects homes - May be in specialist facilities with video
cameras observation rooms behind one-way
mirrors - Usual to offer refreshments to ensure relaxed mood
18Procedure for Planning and Conducting Focus Groups
Specify the Objectives of Qualitative Research
State Objectives/Questions to be answered in
Focus Groups
Write a Screening Questionnaire
Develop a Moderators Outline
Conduct the Focus Group Interviews
Review Tapes and Analyse the Data
Summarise Findings and Plan Follow-Up Research or
Action
19Planning the Focus Group Outline
- A discussion guide
- a written statement of initial remarks to inform
re nature of focus groups and topics to be
addressed - Get everyone talking by introduction
- Initial objective is to break ice and establish
rapport - Open-ended questions to encourage discussion
- Moving from general to specific focus
20The Moderators Role
- To develop a rapport with the group/ must inspire
confidence - To ensure people become relaxed and eager to talk
- To promote interaction
- To focus discussion on topic areas
- When a topic is no longer generating fresh ideas
the flow of discussion should be changed
21Stages of Group Formation
- Forming
- Storming
- Norming
- Performing
- Mourning
22Focus Groups in
Market Research Social Science
- Non-acquaintances
- Virgins
- Observers
- Comparatively cheap
- Skilled moderator
- Quick turnaround
- Client needs
- Clients benefit
- Non-intervention
- Acquaintances
- Experienced
- Assistants
- High organising costs
- Project knowledge
- Painstaking analysis
- Research needs
- Respondents benefit
- Intervention
23 Direct Questioning Barriers
- Awareness
- Irrationality
- Inadmissibility
- Self - incrimination
- Politeness
(Oppenheim, 1968)
24Layers of Consciousness
structured questioning rational justifications
conventional responses
CONSCIOUS FACTORS
PRIVATE FEELINGS AND LANGUAGE
sympathetic interview
INTUITIVE ASSOCIATIONS
non-verbal play, consumers inner world
UNCONSCIOUS SYMBOLS, MYTHS
projective techniques
Lannon Cooper (1983)
25What is a Projective Technique?
- The projective hypothesis is that when
respondents are asked to cope with a deliberately
ambiguous situation or are given a task they will
be unable to do so without projecting themselves
onto the finished product.
26Origins and Rationale
- Ernest Dichters motivational research (1950s)
- Respondents may have insights into their own
motives (at an intuitive level) and use of these
techniques gives them social permission to play
or fantasise - Clues to tell us how consumers feel about brands,
products, services etc. - May be used to find out deeply held attitudes and
opinions
27 Reasons for Use in Research
- Overcome direct question barriers (Fisher,
Oppenheim) - Answered from respondents frame of
reference - Versatile - used with other data collection
techniques - Fun involving for respondents
28Projective Techniques
- Free Associations
- Sentence Completion
- Picture Completion
- Analogy
- Personalisation
- Third Person
- Role Playing
- Psychodrawing
- Thematic Apperception tests
- Collages
29Free Associations
- Ask respondents to say what comes into their head
when thinking about a certain topic - Then follow up with probes and amplifications
- Initial reactions tend to be pragmatic but later
ones show paths to emotional ideas - Useful for relaxing and warming up a group
30Sentence Completion
- Respondent is asked to complete a sentence
- I think the new Beetle
- Most people think the new Beetle
- The new Beetle reminds me of ..
- People who drive retro autos.
- The most important thing about any auto.
- People who drive foreign autos
31Picture Completion
- Bubble picture where respondents fill in a
dialogue between users/non-users before/after,
different brands etc. - What people say / what they really think
- Exercise
- A drawing shows a couple standing in front of a
Volkswagen showroom, looking at the new Beetle.
The respondent is asked to imagine, first what
the man says, then what the women says.
32Analogy
- Imagining the product/brand not as it is but as
something else (music, animal, a texture etc.) - Or like a brand in another product field, a car,
drink, restaurant etc. - Analogies work by freeing respondents from
logical constraints and forcing up emotional
responses - Can tap into social, product, and personal imagery
33Personalisation
- The product or brand becomes a person (or vice
versa) - Helps bring brands to life
- Feeling, thought, character etc (like brand
values) - Or respondents can project themselves into the
roles of user and non-users - Making up eulogies or obituaries can help
34Third Person
- What kind of people drive Porsche?
- What kind of people drive new Beetles?
- What kind of people drive Saturns?
- What kind of people do you imagine the VW dealer
has the most success selling new Beetles? - What kind of people does the VW dealer have most
trouble selling to?
35Role Playing
- Dramatising relationships between brands with
advertising or highlighting decision making
process - Group members take on roles and act out their
fantasies - Specific adaptations
- soap opera / legend/ romantic story/ salesman
technique - Specific aids may be
- dolls / houses / setting/ masks etc.
36Exercise on Role Playing/ Personality Projection
- A new family moves into your neighbourhood (into
your apartment/house). Before you see them, you
notice that their car parked out front is a
Jaguar - Now what kind of people would you guess they are?
- Tell me anything you think about them -
personalities, experience, interest, anything
like that
37Psychodrawing
- Uses colours, shapes and symbols to express how
they feel about brands (Ralph Lauren) - Can be analysed for symbolism
- Can be used as catalysts for probing when
respondents are asked to elaborate on what they
were trying to visualise
38Thematic Apperception Tests
- Respondent is asked to tell a story around a
picture or pictures - Can reveal dimensions of the imagination
- Requires some sort of narrative or plot