Foothill College State of the College 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

Foothill College State of the College 2005

Description:

Santa Rosa Junior College, CA. Skyline College, CA. Stephen F. Austin State University, TX ... Sharing Of Free Intellectual Assets. Free course content for 8 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: bernadi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foothill College State of the College 2005


1
Foothill CollegeState of the College 2005
  • Report to the
  • Board of Trustees
  • May 16, 2005

2
Foothill College Guiding Principles
  • Our Vision
  • Core Values honesty, trust, integrity, openness,
    and forgiveness
  • Purpose Educational Opportunity for All
  • Mission Promote student learning through the
    first two years of lower division coursework

3
Foothill College Guiding Principles
  • Our Mission-based Governance
  • Transfer
  • Career Education
  • Basic skills
  • Student outreach and recruitment
  • Student development and retention

4
Back to Basics the Arkthe woodpecker will have
to go
5
Behavioral Goals of Leadership
  • Instill, maintain and
  • foster trust
  • Energize and stimulate creativity and innovation
  • Keep the pot stirred to promote change

6
What we did
  • Maintain enrollment and productivity
  • Embedded hours
  • Performing Arts Alliance
  • Year-long PE classes
  • Coop Ed

7
What we did
  • Basic skills focus to improve student success
  • Learning communities
  • Academic Senate resolution on course advisories

8
LINC and EWYL Programs (K-16 faculty)
  • 155 students in 1998
  • 7,000 students to date
  • 230 Earn While You Learn Grads

9
New articulations
  • Joint certificate with Stanford School of Ed in
    professional development for teachers
  • New transfer program with SJS in Health Science
  • New BIN program biotechnology, informatics, and
    nanotechnology

10
Enforcement of fee policy
  • Payment required at time of registration
  • Full implementation Winter 2005
  • No negative impact on enrollment
  • Positive impact on retention

11
What we achieved (EMP goals, p. 14, 46 ff.)
  • 1 in State in successful transfer course
    completion
  • 1 in State in basic skills course completion

12
What we achieved (EMP goals, p. 14, 46 ff.)
  • 2 in State in overall successful course
    completion
  • 14 in State in vocational education course
    completion

13
What we achieved(p. 14)
  • 92 student retention
  • 91 in minority student retention
  • 84 student successful course completion
  • 81 minority student successful course
    completion

14
Foothills budget history (p. 15)
  • Positive ending balance each year
  • Are we over-budgeted? No, see budget history
  • Using different strategic sacrifices each year

15
Foothills budget reductions (p. 15)
  • 01-02 512K
  • 02-03 860K
  • 03-04 2.7M
  • 04-05 900K
  • 05-06 800K

16
Foothills budget history (p. 15)
  • Flexible reductions
  • Freezing vac. positions
  • Reassignments
  • Redistribution of tasks
  • Non-teaching to 25 teaching loads

17
Foothills budget history (p. 15)
  • 3 admin. positions
  • 2 divisions w/o deans
  • 14 FT faculty positions
  • 10 non-teach to teach
  • 26 staff partial reassign.
  • Many PT fac. laid off

18
Foothills budget history (p. 15)
  • Academic Restructuring
  • Embedded hours
  • Year-long PE classes
  • Coop Ed
  • Performing Arts Alliance

19
Student tracking system(p. 18)
  • Math lab utilization inversely related to course
    enrolled
  • 81 of students utilize only one service

20
Student tracking system
  • There are implications for the expansion or
    reduction of services

21
What Can We Do Better?(p. 19)
  • Increase number of degrees and certificates
  • Improve tracking transfer students
  • Include assessment and evaluation in student
    learning outcomes

22
What Can We Do Better? (p. 19)
  • Assess and improve employer satisfaction of our
    students
  • Increase Black and Hispanic/Latino successful
    course completion rates by 10 by 2010
  • Improve basic skills learning communities

23
What will be doing? (p. 20)
  • Self-Study for re-accreditation
  • Thematic approach
  • Student Learning Outcomes
  • Organization
  • Planning, Improvement and Evaluation
  • Dialogue
  • Institutional integrity
  • Institutional commitment
  • Campus-wide involvement

24
Outcomes of self-study
  • Climate survey
  • Revision of mission statement
  • Update of Roundtable Guidelines
  • Make perception of inclusivity a reality
  • Complete comprehensive implementation of student
    learning outcomes in curriculum

25
Foothills enrollment 04-05 (p. 24)
  • Fall headcount declined 5
  • Fall FTES up 1
  • Precipitous decline in Visa students (17)
  • And CTIS students (61 in 5 years)

26
FTES by Division (p. 29)
27
Student Age Distribution(p. 31)
  • Median age of 27
  • Modal age of 19
  • Average age is 33
  • 43 of students under 25
  • 22 of students are full-time
  • 79 are day students
  • 8 are first-time college students
  • 30 hold a bachelors degree or higher

28
Student Age Distribution(p. 31)
29
Productivity (p. 37)
  • 562 productivity exceeded district goal of 558
  • Annual review of programs/departments under 530

30
Productivity by division
31
  • Special Projects

32
The Sakai Communityand ETUDES
33
Getting Started with ETUDES
  • The ETUDES story, beginning in 1994
  • ETUDES Easy To Use Distance Education Software
  • Michael Loceff, faculty-author of ETUDES
  • Michael Loceff, co-executive producer/writer of
    24-2004

34
(No Transcript)
35
ETUDES the First Generation
  • Enter Vivian Sinou in 2000
  • ETUDES Alliance created
  • 50 colleges
  • 60,000 students
  • Open source

36
ETUDES Community
  • Bakersfield College, CACerro Coso Community
    College, CACoastline Community College,
    CACollege of Alameda, CACollege of the
    Siskiyous, CACrafton Hills College, CADe Anza
    College, CAEast Los Angeles College, CAFoothill
    College, CA Gavilan College, CAGlendale
    Community College, CAHarcum College, PAImperial
    Valley College, CALake Tahoe Community College,
    CALaney College, CALos Angeles City College,
    CALos Angeles Harbor College, CALos Angeles
    Mission College, CALos Angeles Pierce College,
    CALos Angeles Southwest College, CA
  • Los Angeles Trade-Tech College, CALos Angeles
    Valley College, CAMerritt College,
    CAPorterville College, CAMendocino College,
    CASan Bernardino Valley College, CASan Joaquin
    Delta College, CATaft College, CAVista College,
    CAWest Los Angeles College, CA
  • Antelope Valley College, CAChabot
    College, CAEl Camino College, CALong Beach City
    College, CAMiraCosta College, CASanta Rosa
    Junior College, CASkyline College, CAStephen F.
    Austin State University, TXWest Valley College,
    CA

37
Community Source Effort
  • University of Michigan
  • Indiana University
  • MIT
  • Stanford University
  • Foothill College
  • UC-Berkeley
  • Open Knowledge Initiative (OKI)
  • uPortal Consortium
  • Sakai Partners
  • Commercial Affiliates Program

38
SOFIA Project
  • Sharing Of Free Intellectual Assets
  • Free course content for 8 courses
  • Creative topography
  • Elementary statistics
  • Enterprise network security
  • Musicianship II
  • Intro. to Java programming
  • Intro. To Macromedia Flash
  • Physical geography
  • Webpage authoring

39
Back to the Basics
  • Focus on basic skills to position ourselves for
    the impact of CSUs 2007 decision
  • Respond to CAN decision

40
Foothill College Opening Day
  • Selected Findings on Basic Skills

Rob Johnstone, 9/17/04
41
1.2 English Placement Status of Core Transfer
Students, Fall 2002
Note Analysis includes 5,800 students from Fall
2002 who were taking 6 units and did not already
have an AA degree or higher 1,679 had taken the
English Placement test.
Data Excerpted from P12 Summary Tables
42
1.3 ESL Placement Status of Core Transfer
Students, Fall 2002
Note Analysis includes 5,800 students from Fall
2002 who were taking 6 units and did not already
have an AA degree or higher 909 had taken the
ESL Placement test.
Data Excerpted from P12 Summary Tables
43
1.4 Math Placement Status of Core Transfer
Students, Fall 2002
Note Analysis includes 5,678 students from Fall
2001 who were taking 6 units and did not already
have an AA degree or higher 3,085 had taken the
Math Placement test.
Data Excerpted from P12 Summary Tables
44
  • 1.5 How many students are placed into Basic
    Skills and do not enroll, or enroll in non-Basic
    Skills courses?

45
1.5 Placement Outcomes
Data Excerpted from Executive Summary P14
46
2.1 What are the success rates of Basic Skills
students?
  • Math
  • 250 65
  • 200 58
  • 101 57
  • 105 69

English 100 75 110 73
ESL 130s 71 140s 67 150s 67 160s
80 170s 78 025 81
Data Covers 2003-2004 School Year
47
2.2 What are the success rates in Basic Skills
courses by ethnicity?
  • Math
  • Asian 71
  • Black 46
  • Filipino 68
  • Hispanic 54
  • White 68
  • Other/Unk 68

English Asian 76 Black 68 Filipino
65 Hispanic 68 White 80 Other/Unk 77
ESL Asian 82 Hispanic 64 White
84 Other/Unk 71
Data Covers 2003-2004 School Year
48
2.3 What are the retention rates of Basic
Skills students?
  • Math
  • 250 88
  • 200 85
  • 101 86
  • 105 79

English 100 88 110 88
ESL 130s 90 140s 86 150s 88 160s
92 170s 93 025 93
Data Covers 2003-2004 School Year
49
  • 2.9 Do students who complete their Basic Skills
    courses have a higher rate of success than those
    who dont?

50
2.9A English Course Completion BSS Success
Data Excerpted from Executive Summary P13
51
2.9B English Placement and BSS Success
Data Excerpted from Executive Summary P13
52
2.9C Math Level and Econ 1/Actg 1/Astr 10
Data Excerpted from Executive Summary P55
53
Decisions for the future
  • Fully implement BS learning communities
  • Mandate BS placement
  • Finalize block scheduling
  • Monitor bookstore parameters
  • Est. Heritage Rooms

54
Preparing for the next generation student
  • Onset of deep learning
  • Better understanding of how and what students
    truly learn
  • Focus on the in-depth concepts in course content
  • Moving from teaching to learning and from
    learning to deep learning

55
Deep learning is not timed
  • The measurement of student work is increasingly
    more focused on what the student is learning
    rather than how much time is spent in a course

56
Deep learning is not timed
  • If there are no real time constraints, what
    constitutes a five unit course?
  • The content!

57
So that we can focus on
  • Not just what students know, but how well they
    know it
  • Not just how many students we serve, but how well
    we do it
  • Not just how high our transfer rate is, but which
    universities accept our students
  • Not just how many career education students get
    jobs, but what types of jobs they get

58
Course Outline agenda for 2005-06
  • Basic Skills Across the Curriculum, Pt. 2
  • Understanding and Promoting Deep Learning

59
Special thanks to
  • Paul Aguilar, Campus Services
  • Bob Barr, Institutional Research
  • George Beers, Intl Distance Learning
  • Mia Casey, Presidents Office
  • Alan Harvey, VP Ed. Resources Instruction
  • Kee Hoon Chung, ASFC
  • Rob Johnstone, IIR Office
  • Jon Obergh, Chancellors Office
  • Bill Patterson, VP, IIR Office

60
Special thanks to
  • Lucy Rodriguez, IIR Office
  • Vivian Sinou, Dean, Distance Mediated Learning
  • Paul Starer, Academic Senate
  • Annette Stenger, Presidents Office
  • Lori Thomas, Marketing
  • Marilyn Williams and Custodial Staff
  • Carmela Xuerb, Classified Senate
  • Administrative Council
  • Faculty, Staff and Students of Foothill College

61
Questions?
  • Answers?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com