Cochlear Implantation in Acquired ANSD: 2 Case Reports - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Cochlear Implantation in Acquired ANSD: 2 Case Reports

Description:

Sudden onset hearing loss with balance disturbance and dysarthria ... routine in individuals with sudden hearing loss secondary to acute illness, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: neilh5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cochlear Implantation in Acquired ANSD: 2 Case Reports


1
Cochlear Implantation in Acquired ANSD 2 Case
Reports
  • 3 July 2009
  • Neil Heslop, MNZAS-CCC
  • Southern Cochlear Implant Programme

2
Case Studies
  • Child KS (F) - Personal Information
  • Age now 155
  • Referred 04.10.2005 Age at referral 109
  • Implanted 26.10.2006 Age at implant 119
  • Currently 28 post-implant
  • Child GV (M) - Personal Information
  • Age now 117
  • Referred 05.09.2006 Age at referral 89
  • Implanted 16.05.2007 Age at implant 95

3
Child KS
4
History
  • Bouts of serious illness at 1 and 3 years with
    convulsions, balance disturbance, and hearing
    loss
  • (? Encephalitis)
  • Intermittent hearing aid use over several years
    relies heavily on speech reading and the written
    word no benefit from hearing aids, not worn
    reliably as a result
  • EEG at 5 years of age the EEG continues to show
    more beta than one normally sees in a child of
    this age
  • Further bout of illness resulting in
    deterioration in hearing, 3 months prior to
    cochlear implant referral

5
Classroom and Social
  • Appears to comprehend very little spoken word
    although she copes a lot better when things are
    written down
  • Watching what her peers are doing and trying to
    follow their example she watches very closely
    and looks very worried she is appearing very
    stressed in class is now very isolated

6
Audiology Pre-Implant
Serial Audiometry 2001 2005
7
Audiology Pre-Implant
  • robust OAE responses in both ears consistent
    with good cochlea sensory cell function
  • Cortical responses right but not left
  • ABR Reliable and repeatable cochlear
    microphonics were found in both ears

8
CI Assessment
9
Speech Perception Pre-Implant
  • HINT-C sentences A-V A-A
  • Unaided 88 33
  • Aided 96 0
  • CNC Words A-V A-A
  • Unaided 44 16
  • Aided 48 32

10
Habilitation Pre-Implant
  • No pattern perception
  • No ability to detect voice on / voice off
    (difficulty monitoring own voice as a result)
  • functionally K is profoundly deaf

11
Habilitation Test Battery
  • MAIS
  • Pre-Implant 2 / 40
  • EVT
  • Pre-Implant CA 119 LA 76
  • PPVT
  • Pre-Implant CA 119 LA 79

12
Implantation
  • Decision to implant made in conjunction with
    family
  • Childs school and social circumstances
    increasingly desperate
  • Implanted with (L) Nucleus Freedom no
    complications

13
NRT in Theatre
14
MAP Dynamic range
15
Speech Perception Post-Implant
  • HINT-C sentences A-V A-A
  • CI Aided at 6 months 94 99
  • CI Aided at 12 months 100 98
  • CNC Words A-V A-A
  • CI Aided at 6 months 96 52
  • CI Aided at 12 months 88 72

16
Habilitation Post-Implant
  • MAIS (out of 40)
  • Post-Implant
  • 3 months 35
  • 12 months 40
  • PPVT
  • 12 months CA 1310 LA 97
  • 2 years CA 1411 LA 101
  • EVT
  • 12 months CA 1310 LA 1110

17
Child GV
18
Child GV
  • Personal Information
  • Age now 117
  • Referred 05.09.2006 Age at referral 89
  • Implanted 16.05.2007 Age at implant 95
  • Currently 22 years post-implant

19
History
  • Acute meningitis-like illness with severe
    head-ache, cough, and high fever at 5 ½ years
  • Sudden onset hearing loss with balance
    disturbance and dysarthria
  • Further sudden deterioration in hearing
    subsequent to an URTI treated aggressively with
    steroids
  • Local audiological testing revealed poor speech
    discrimination following the last drop in hearing
    levels
  • Aided KTT 60 A-V
  • Aided KTT 10-20 A-A
  • Referral to CI Programme from AODC initiated

20
Classroom and Social
  • experiencing significant barriers to all
    communication
  • unable to access classroom instruction and
    discussion without the support of the written
    word
  • Finding it difficult to monitor voice levels and
    has to be prompted to turn on his voice
  • Needs to know of changes in classroom routine in
    advance
  • Can no longer hear the school bell or fire alarm
  • Looks around the room and is ill at ease watching
    the other children

21
Audiology Pre-Implant
2003
2006
22
CI Assessment
23
Speech Perception Pre-Implant
  • deVault Common Phrases A-V A-A
  • Unaided 64 56
  • Aided 73 54
  • Hearing aids make no difference auditory-alone.
    There is possibly some benefit for speech-reading
  • many responses were word perfect but were then
    followed almost immediately by a number of errors
    that bore no relation to the original stimulus

24
TEOAE
25
DPOAE
26
Audiology Pre-Implant
  • ABR
  • no synchronous neural activity in any of the
    traces beyond 2 ms repeatable potential in each
    ear between 0 and 1 ms would reverse with a
    reversal of the polarity of the stimulus not
    apparent with an alternating stimulus

27
Habilitation Pre-Implant
  • MAIS (out of 40)
  • Pre-Implant 15 / 40
  • NSW Auditory Skills Placement Test
  • (Sound Awareness, Discourse, Sentence, Word)
  • Pre-Implant No scores on any subtest

28
Implantation
  • Decision to implant made in conjunction with
    family as per child KS
  • Implanted with (R) Nucleus Freedom no
    complications
  • No NRT response in theatre

29
MAP Dynamic range
30
Speech Perception _at_ 6 months
  • HINT-C sentences A-V A-A
  • CI 100 94
  • CIHA - 96
  • CNC Words A-V A-A
  • CI 88 76
  • CIHA 80 64

31
Speech Perception _at_ 12 months
  • HINT-C sentences A-A
  • CI 99
  • CIHA 97
  • CNC Words A-A
  • CI 72
  • CIHA 56

32
Habilitation Post-Implant
  • MAIS (out of 40)
  • 6 months Post-Implant 32 (15)
  • NSW Auditory Skills Placement Test
  • (Sound Awareness, Discourse, Sentence, Word)
  • All 6 Ling sounds at 6 metres
  • Passed all other sub-tests

33
Habilitation Post-Implant
  • CELF
  • 1 month CA 97 LA 80
  • PPVT
  • 1 month CA 97 LA 80
  • 12 months CA 106 LA 81
  • EVT
  • 12 months CA 106 LA 95

34
Summary and Conclusions
  • Both children continue to be good users of their
    devices and continue to make gains
  • These 2 cases of demonstrate successful use of CI
    as an intervention in ANSD secondary to acute
    illness
  • Neurodiagnostic ABR and OAE should be considered
    routine in individuals with sudden hearing loss
    secondary to acute illness, particularly where
    the audiogram is atypical or there is discrepancy
    between hearing levels and school and social
    progress
  • Concerns about destroying significant residual
    hearing through the CI process should not deter
    this as a possible intervention

35
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com